Cited by 18Research Data Management PracticesEnvironmental Monitoring and Data ManagementData Analysis and Archiving

Digital repository of associations between environmental variables: A new resource to facilitate knowledge synthesis

Open access
Ziegler, C. Richard, Webb, J. Angus, Norton, Susan B., Pullin, Andrew S., Melcher, Andreas H.·2015·Ecological Indicators

Abstract

Responsible care and management of Earth's resources requires scientific support, but the pool of underused research is growing rapidly. Environmental science research studies describe associations between variables (e.g. statistical relationships between stressors and responses). We propose open-access and online sharing of such associations. This concept differs from various efforts around the world to promote sharing of primary research data, but holds similar goals of improved use of existing knowledge. The initiative is made possible by recent developments in information technology and evolving online culture (e.g. crowdsourcing and citizen science). We have begun to connect existing projects that catalog and store associations, thereby moving toward a single virtual repository. Researchers and decision makers may share and re-use associations for myriad purposes, including: increasing efficiency and timeliness of systematic reviews, environmental assessments and meta-analyses, identifying knowledge gaps and research opportunities, providing evolved metrics of research impact, and demonstrating connections between research and environmental improvement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.01.003

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research from healthcare has shown that the effect of a single extra study on the conclusions of a review can depend on both the statistical power of the added study, and the extent of inter-study variability in the specified response variable.

    “Research from healthcare has shown that the effect of a single extra study on the conclusions of a review can depend on both the statistical power of the added study 24 , and the extent of inter-study variability in the specified response variable 25 .”

    From Software support for environmental evidence synthesis (2018) · cites this paper as [24]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. National Advisory Council for Environmental Policy and Technology, 2002. The Envi- ronmental Future: Emerging Challenges and Opportunities for EPA. Washington DC. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Thompson Reuters, 2013. Thomson Reuters Hosts Challenge to Generate Ideas for Expanding the Scientific Discovery Experience on the Web of Knowl- edge [WWW Document], http://thomsonreuters.com/press-releases/012013/ thomson reuters hosts challenge to generate ideas for expanding the scientific discovery experience on the web of knowledge (accessed 29.08.13).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ziegler, C. R., Webb, J. A., Norton, S. B., Pullin, A. S., & Melcher, A. H.
Affiliations
  • Environmental Protection Agency (US)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Bangor University (GB)
  • BOKU University (AT)
Corresponding author
Ziegler, C. Richard
Venue
Ecological Indicators
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
53
Pages
61-69
ISSN
1470-160X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972087516
Cited by
18
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
10.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Ecological Indicators (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • WISER (226273)
  • MARS (603378)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Environmental Monitoring and Data Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Data Analysis and Archiving
Keywords
digital repositories, environmental organizations, knowledge sharing, open access, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, environmental assessment, research reuse, knowledge gaps, research impact metrics, crowdsourcing, citizen science

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review