Cited by 24Sustainable Agricultural Systems AnalysisAgriculture and Rural Development ResearchAgricultural economics and policies

Capturing the diversity of Mediterranean farming systems prior to their sustainability assessment: The case of Cyprus

Stylianou, Andreas, Sdrali, Despina, Apostolopoulos, Constantinos D.·2020·Land Use Policy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104722

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stylianou, A., Sdrali, D., & Apostolopoulos, C. D.
Affiliations
Harokopio University of Athens (GR)
Corresponding author
Stylianou, Andreas
Venue
Land Use Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-07
Volume
96
Pages
104722
ISSN
0264-8377 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3027092269
Cited by
24
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Land Use Policy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Agriculture and Rural Development Research
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Agricultural economics and policies
Keywords
farm heterogeneity, farm profitability, agricultural subsidies, off-farm income, animal husbandry, crop farming, sustainable intensification, agricultural policy, Cyprus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review