Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 312

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What drives the vegetation restoration in Yangtze River basin, China: Climate change or anthropogenic factors?

Qu, Sai, Wang, Lunche, Lin, Aiwen, Zhu, Hongji, Yuan, Moxi·2018·Ecological Indicators

Abstract

Abstract Knowledge of the vegetation dynamics is critical for addressing the potential challenges and threats facing the land surface ecosystems. Various climatic and anthropogenic factors such as temperature, precipitation, ecological engineering, and population density can affect the vegetation conditions. Yet how vegetation in the Yangtze River basin (YRB) responses to climate change and human activities is not well established. We investigate the spatiotemporal variations of vegetation coverage using Normal Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) during 1982–2015, and distinguish the effects of climatic and anthropogenic factors on vegetation dynamics. The results show that the growing-season NDVI (GSN) has increased by 0.09% during the 34-year period, the changes indicated a significant upward trend of vegetation with annual change rates of 0.09% GSN year−1 during 1982–2015.especially after 1994, the vegetation coverage has significantly increased. Temperature is a controlling factor determining the vegetation greenness in YRB, and the response of vegetation to precipitation is relatively lower because of the abundant water. Meanwhile, land use changes caused by ecological restoration project is the major driving factor for improving vegetation conditions in YRB, and the spatial distributions between human-induced GSN increasing trends and areas with increased forest have a strong consistency in the north of YRB. High effectiveness of ecological restoration projects are closely related to the combined effects of topography, climate and human management. The areas in northern part of Hubei and Sichuan are characterized by suitable climate and moderate elevation, leading to a high effectiveness for vegetation restoration. For the Hengduan Mountain area with complex terrain and lower precipitation added with poor traffic accessibility, low or even no effectiveness of project implementations can be observed. Furthermore, the large-scale migration and movement of the labor force in YRB relieve the environmental pressures and improve the vegetation conditions for the region of emigration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.03.029

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Cited by

See all 312

Metadata

Authors
Qu, S., Wang, L., Lin, A., Zhu, H., & Yuan, M.
Venue
Ecological Indicators
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
90
Pages
438-450
ISSN
1470-160X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2793529083
Cited by
312
References
44
FWCI
18.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What drives the vegetation restoration in Yangtze River basin, China: Climate change or anthropogenic factors? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.03.029
The paper
Qu, S., Wang, L., Lin, A., Zhu, H., & Yuan, M. (2018). What drives the vegetation restoration in Yangtze River basin, China: Climate change or anthropogenic factors? Ecological Indicators. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.03.029

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.