The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Species distribution models and ecological theory: A critical assessment and some possible new approaches
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pearson, R. G., & Dawson, T. P. (2003) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1046/j.1466-822x.2003.00042.x · Cited by 4,252
COMPETITIVE INTERACTIONS BETWEEN TREE SPECIES IN NEW ZEALAND'S OLD-GROWTH INDIGENOUS FORESTS
Leathwick, J. R., & Austin, M. P. (2001) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[2560:cibtsi]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 243
Self-citation
Cited by
Species Distribution Models: Ecological Explanation and Prediction Across Space and Time
Elith, J., & Leathwick, J. R. (2009) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120159 · Cited by 6,707
AUC: A misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models
Lobo, J. M., Jiménez‐Valverde, A., & Real, R. (2008) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00358.x · Cited by 3,499
Merow, C., Smith, M. J., & Silander, J. A. (2013) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.07872.x · Cited by 3,392
Machine Learning Methods Without Tears: A Primer for Ecologists
Olden, J. D., Lawler, J. J., & Poff, N. L. (2008) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/587826 · Cited by 823
The uncertain nature of absences and their importance in species distribution modelling
Lobo, J. M., Jiménez‐Valverde, A., & Hortal, J. (2010) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.06039.x · Cited by 656
Oppel, S., Meirinho, A., Ramírez, I., Gardner, B., O’Connell, A. F., Miller, P. I., & Louzao, M. (2012) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2011.11.013 · Cited by 304
Comparing Habitat Suitability and Connectivity Modeling Methods for Conserving Pronghorn Migrations
Poor, E. E., Loucks, C., Jakes, A., & Urban, D. L. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049390 · Cited by 120
Predicting Distributions of Invasive Species
Elith, J. (2017) · Invasive Species · doi:10.1017/9781139019606.006 · Cited by 106
Paleodistribution modeling in archaeology and paleoanthropology
Franklin, J., Potts, A. J., Fisher, E. C., Cowling, R. M., & Marean, C. W. (2015) · Quaternary Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2014.12.015 · Cited by 71
Linking Dynamic Habitat Selection with Wading Bird Foraging Distributions across Resource Gradients
Beerens, J. M., Noonburg, E. G., & Gawlik, D. E. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0128182 · Cited by 53
Modeling the Potential Dispersal of Asian Longhorned Beetle Using Circuit Theory
Elmes, A., Rogan, J., Williams, C., Ratick, S., & Nowak, D. (2019) · The Professional Geographer · doi:10.1080/00330124.2019.1611458 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Austin, M.
- Venue
- Ecological Modelling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 200
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 1-19
- ISSN
- 0304-3800 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2168213791
- Cited by
- 1,504
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 27.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
