Cited by 263Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement AnalysisFinancial Literacy and BehaviorDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Gender differences in financial risk taking: The role of financial literacy and risk tolerance

Open access
Bannier, Christina E., Neubert, Milena·2016·Economics Letters

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.econlet.2016.05.033

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The difference in risk taking based on individuals' own perception of their financial abilities is more pronounced for women.

    “Moreover, the authors observe a gender gap in that this difference in risk taking based on individuals' own perception of their financial abilities is more pronounced for women.”

    From Financial literacy, financial advice, and financial behavior (2017) · cites this paper as Bannier and Neubert (2016b)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 16 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bannier, C. E., & Neubert, M.
Affiliations
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Corresponding author
Bannier, Christina E.
Venue
Economics Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-08
Volume
145
Pages
130-135
ISSN
0165-1765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2299458250
Cited by
249
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1
FWCI
47.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Economics Letters (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy and Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
gender differences, financial risk-taking, financial literacy, risk tolerance, women investors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review