Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 617Complex Systems and Time Series AnalysisFinancial Markets and Investment StrategiesFinancial Risk and Volatility Modeling

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The inefficiency of Bitcoin revisited: A dynamic approach

Open access
Bariviera, Aurelio F.·2017·Economics Letters

Abstract

This letter revisits the informational efficiency of the Bitcoin market. In particular we analyze the time-varying behavior of long memory of returns on Bitcoin and volatility 2011 until 2017, using the Hurst exponent. Our results are twofold. First, R/S method is prone to detect long memory, whereas DFA method can discriminate more precisely variations in informational efficiency across time. Second, daily returns exhibit persistent behavior in the first half of the period under study, whereas its behavior is more informational efficient since 2014. Finally, price volatility, measured as the logarithmic difference between intraday high and low prices exhibits long memory during all the period. This reflects a different underlying dynamic process generating the prices and volatility.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.econlet.2017.09.013

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 617

Metadata

Authors
Bariviera, A. F.
Affiliations
Universitat Rovira i Virgili (ES)
Corresponding author
Bariviera, Aurelio F.
Venue
Economics Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-12
Volume
161
Pages
1-4
ISSN
0165-1765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2758991599
Cited by
617
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 88 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 103 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 6
FWCI
123.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
  • other-oa
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Economics Letters (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
Keywords
Bitcoin, information efficiency, long-range dependence, Hurst exponent, price volatility, time-varying efficiency, cryptocurrency market, daily returns

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.