Cited by 23scientometrics and bibliometrics researchAcademic Writing and PublishingAcademic Publishing and Open Access

Easy to read, easy to cite?

Open access
Dowling, Michael, Hammami, Helmi, Zreik, Ousayna·2018·Economics Letters

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.econlet.2018.09.023

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 15 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dowling, M., Hammami, H., & Zreik, O.
Affiliations
École Supérieure de Commerce de Rennes (FR)
Corresponding author
Zreik, Ousayna
Venue
Economics Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
173
Pages
100-103
ISSN
0165-1765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2894588581
Cited by
23
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Economics Letters (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
Keywords
readability, citation impact, abstracts, macroeconomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review