Exploring the change in scientific readability following the release of ChatGPT

The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship

Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., et al. (2016) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.18 · Cited by 18,423 · cited 1× · see citing works

A new readability yardstick.

Flesch, R. (1948) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0057532 · Cited by 5,391 · see citing works

Derivation of New Readability Formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy Enlisted Personnel

Kincaid, J. P., Fishburne, Jr., Robert P., R., Richard L., C., & Brad, S. (1975) · doi:10.21236/ada006655 · Cited by 3,497 · see citing works

A computer readability formula designed for machine scoring.

Coleman, M., & Liau, T. L. (1975) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0076540 · Cited by 1,056 · see citing works

<scp>ChatGPT</scp> and a new academic reality: <scp>Artificial Intelligence‐written</scp> research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing

Lund, B. D., Wang, T., Mannuru, N. R., Nie, B., Shimray, S., & Wang, Z. (2023) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24750 · Cited by 919 · see citing works

The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape

Fraser, N., Brierley, L., Dey, G., Polka, J. K., Pálfy, M., Nanni, F., & Coates, J. A. (2021) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000959 · Cited by 555 · cited 1× · see citing works

Fabrication and errors in the bibliographic citations generated by ChatGPT

Walters, W. H., & Wilder, E. I. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-41032-5 · Cited by 499 · see citing works

The readability of scientific texts is decreasing over time

Plavén‐Sigray, P., Matheson, G. J., Schiffler, B. C., & Thompson, W. H. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.27725 · Cited by 259 · see citing works

Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review

Hosseini, M., & Horbach, S. P. J. M. (2023) · Research Integrity and Peer Review · doi:10.1186/s41073-023-00133-5 · Cited by 243 · cited 1× · see citing works

Delving into LLM-assisted writing in biomedical publications through excess vocabulary

Kobak, D., González-Márquez, R., Horvát, E.-Á., & Lause, J. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.07016 · Cited by 214

Artificial intelligence to support publishing and peer review: A summary and review

Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2023) · Learned Publishing · doi:10.1002/leap.1570 · Cited by 162 · see citing works

Detecting AI-generated essays: the ChatGPT challenge

Cingillioglu, I. (2023) · International Journal of Information and Learning Technology · doi:10.1108/ijilt-03-2023-0043 · Cited by 135 · see citing works

A large-scaled corpus for assessing text readability

Crossley, S. A., Heintz, A., Choi, J. S., Batchelor, J., Karimi, M., & Malatinszky, A. (2022) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-022-01802-x · Cited by 106 · see citing works

Risks of abuse of large language models, like <scp>ChatGPT</scp> , in scientific publishing: Authorship, predatory publishing, and paper mills

Kendall, G., & Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2024) · Learned Publishing · doi:10.1002/leap.1578 · Cited by 100 · see citing works

AI tools can improve equity in science

Berdejo-Espinola, V., & Amano, T. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adg9714 · Cited by 83 · see citing works

Monitoring AI-Modified Content at Scale: A Case Study on the Impact of ChatGPT on AI Conference Peer Reviews

Liang, W., Izzo, Z., Zhang, Y., Lepp, H., Cao, H., Zhao, X., Chen, L., Ye, H., Liu, S., Huang, Z., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.07183 · Cited by 73 · see citing works

ChatGPT as Research Scientist: Probing GPT’s capabilities as a Research Librarian, Research Ethicist, Data Generator, and Data Predictor

Lehr, S. A., Caliskan, A., Liyanage, S., & Banaji, M. R. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2404328121 · Cited by 66 · see citing works

The readability of articles in tourism journals

Dolničar, S., & Chapple, A. R. (2015) · Annals of Tourism Research · doi:10.1016/j.annals.2015.03.003 · Cited by 61 · see citing works

Chatbots, generative AI, and scholarly manuscripts: WAME recommendations on chatbots and generative artificial intelligence in relation to scholarly publications

Zielinski, C., Winker, M. A., Aggarwal, R., Ferris, L. E., Heinemann, M., Lapeña, J. F., Pai, S. A., Ing, E., Citrome, L., Alam, M., et al. (2024) · Current Medical Research and Opinion · doi:10.1080/03007995.2023.2286102 · Cited by 59 · see citing works

Mapping the Increasing Use of LLMs in Scientific Papers

Liang, W., Zhang, Y., Wu, Z., Lepp, H., Ji, W., Zhao, X., Cao, H., Liu, S., He, S., Huang, Z., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.01268 · Cited by 55 · see citing works

How many preprints have actually been printed and why: a case study of computer science preprints on arXiv

Lin, J., Yao, Y., Zhou, Y., Zhou, Z., & Shi, X. (2020) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03430-8 · Cited by 54 · see citing works

The relationship between readability and scientific impact: Evidence from emerging technology discourses

Ante, L. (2022) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2022.101252 · Cited by 52 · cited 1× · see citing works

The role of geographical proximity in knowledge diffusion, measured by citations to scientific literature

Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Costa, F. D. (2020) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2020.101010 · Cited by 50 · see citing works

Editors’ statement on the responsible use of generative AI technologies in scholarly journal publishing

Kaebnick, G. E., Magnus, D. C., Kao, A. C., Hosseini, M., Resnik, D. B., Dubljević, V., Rentmeester, C. A., Gordijn, B., & Cherry, M. J. (2023) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-023-10176-6 · Cited by 47 · see citing works

Readability is decreasing in language and linguistics

Wang, S., Liu, X., & Zhou, J. (2022) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-022-04427-1 · Cited by 36 · see citing works

Readability and research impact

McCannon, B. C. (2019) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2019.02.017 · Cited by 28 · see citing works

Incorrect data in the widely used Inside Airbnb dataset

Alsudais, A. (2020) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2020.113453 · Cited by 28 · see citing works

Estimating the use of ChatGPT in dental research publications

Uribe, S. E., & Maldupa, I. (2024) · Journal of Dentistry · doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105275 · Cited by 27 · see citing works

Easy to read, easy to cite?

Dowling, M., Hammami, H., & Zreik, O. (2018) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2018.09.023 · Cited by 23 · see citing works

Scientific impact analysis: Unraveling the link between linguistic properties and citations

Porwal, P., & Devare, M. H. (2024) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2024.101526 · Cited by 21 · see citing works

Detection of ChatGPT fake science with the xFakeSci learning algorithm

Hamed, A. A., & Wu, X. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-66784-6 · Cited by 16 · see citing works

ChatGPT and scientific papers in veterinary neurology; is the genie out of the bottle?

Abani, S., Volk, H. A., Decker, S. D., Fenn, J., Rusbridge, C., Charalambous, M., Gonçalves, R., Gutierrez‐Quintana, R., Loderstedt, S., Flegel, T., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2023.1272755 · Cited by 15 · see citing works

Leveraging and exercising caution with ChatGPT and other generative artificial intelligence tools in environmental psychology research

Yuan, S., Li, F., Browning, M. H. E. M., Bardhan, M., Zhang, K., McAnirlin, O., Patwary, M. M., & Reuben, A. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1295275 · Cited by 13 · see citing works

Ungendered Writing: Writing Styles are Unlikely to Account for Gender Differences in Funding Rates in the Natural and Technical Sciences

Horbach, S. P. J. M., Schneider, J. W., & Sainte‐Marie, M. H. (2022) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2022.101332 · Cited by 12 · see citing works

CHATBOTS, GENERATIVE AI, AND SCHOLARLY MANUSCRIPTS WAME RECOMMENDATIONS ON CHATBOTS AND GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN RELATION TO SCHOLARLY PUBLICATIONS

Zielinski, C., Winker, M. A., Aggarwal, R., Ferris, L. E., Heinemann, M., Jose Florencio Lapeña, Jr., Pai, S. A., Ing, E., Citrome, L., Alam, M., et al. (2023) · Journal of Postgraduate Medical Institute · doi:10.54079/jpmi.37.3.3284 · Cited by 11 · see citing works

A Study on the Readability of Scientific Publications

Vergoulis, T., Kanellos, I., Tzerefos, A., Chatzopoulos, S., Dalamagas, T. M., & Skiadopoulos, S. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-30760-8_12 · Cited by 10 · see citing works

How the readability of manuscript before journal submission advantages peer review process: Evidence from biomedical scientific publications

Sun, Z., He, D., & Li, Y. (2024) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2024.101547 · Cited by 6 · see citing works

In-code citation practices in open research software libraries

Alsudais, A. (2021) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2021.101139 · Cited by 4 · see citing works

How much are LLMs changing the language of academic papers after ChatGPT? A multi-database and full text analysis

Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2026) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-026-05601-5 · Cited by 10 · see citing works

Which abstract stylistic features fool ChatGPT research evaluations?

Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. A. (2026) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-026-05756-1 · Cited by 2 · see citing works

Opinion paper: generative AI and the future of scientometrics

Lepori, B., Andersen, J. P., & Donnay, K. (2026) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-026-05667-1 · Cited by 5 · see citing works

LLM-Assisted writing in engineering is associated with higher citations as evidenced from 1.17 million papers

McCreery, Z., & Naser, M. Z. (2026) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2026.101842

Ethical opportunities and risks of using ChatGPT for open science: evidence from a three-year mixed-methods study

Nazarovets, S., & da Silva, J. A. T. (2026) · Journal of Ethics in Entrepreneurship and Technology · doi:10.1108/jeet-09-2025-0059 · Cited by 1 · see citing works

From connectivity to insight: A graph neural network–large language model synergy for scholar–topic recommendation

Huo, C., Liu, Z., & Dan, T. (2026) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/01655515261461741

A Multi-Source Data Fusion Framework for Emerging Technology Topic Identification: Integrating Publications, Patents, and GitHub Open-Source Data

Wang, G., & Wu, R. (2026) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems14091040

LLM-assisted writing and citation advantage: evidence from scientific publications before and after ChatGPT release

Paklina, S. N., Паршаков, П. А., & Shakina, E. A. (2026) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-026-05805-9

Finding the Fingerprints of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Psychology Publications

Botes, E., Teuber, Z., Vitali, N., Dewaele, J., & Colling, J. (2026) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/25152459261472842 · Cited by 5 · see citing works

Changing readability of scientific writing: a data mining approach to studying language evolution

Yao, M., & Wang, H. (2026) · Corpora · doi:10.3366/cor.2026.0364

Accelerated Drift of Scientific Prose in the LLM Era: Evidence from an Interrupted Time-Series Analysis

Hubarava, H., & Ineichen, B. V. (2026) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/2026.emnlp-main.2237

The readability of scientific texts is decreasing over time

Plavén‐Sigray, P., Matheson, G. J., Schiffler, B. C., & Thompson, W. H. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.27725 · Cited by 259 · see citing works

Decrypting Complexity: A Tri-Metric Evaluation of Readability and Fidelity in AI-Simplified Scientific Texts for ESL University Learners

Aziz, M., Al-Jamili, O., Nordin, N. R. M., & Akhter, S. (2025) · Forum for Linguistic Studies · doi:10.30564/fls.v7i11.11269

The relationship between readability and scientific impact: Evidence from emerging technology discourses

Ante, L. (2022) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2022.101252 · Cited by 52 · see citing works