Cited by 244Land Use and Ecosystem ServicesUrban Green Space and HealthUrban Arborization and Environmental Studies

A review of studies assessing ecosystem services provided by urban green and blue infrastructure

Open access
Veerkamp, Clara J., Schipper, Aafke M., Hedlund, Katarina, Lazarova, Tanya, Nordin, Amanda, Hanson, Helena I.·2021·Ecosystem Services

Abstract

Urban green and blue infrastructure (GBI) and associated ecosystem services (ES) are increasingly recognized for their potential to address urban sustainability challenges. This has resulted in an increase in studies quantifying ES in cities. In this review, we analysed 850 peer-reviewed publications to characterize urban ES assessment in terms of geographical location, urban GBI type and methodological aspects (e.g. ES indicators). The analyses covered six ES: local temperature regulation, stormwater regulation, waste treatment, air quality regulation, pollination, and recreation and aesthetic appreciation. The majority of ES assessments focused on local temperature regulation (36%) and recreation and aesthetic appreciation (23%) and assessments were often conducted within unspecified green space (30%) and parks (26%). A common method to assess GBI performance was the comparison of ES delivery along a gradient of vegetation cover (24%). Moreover, assessments used a wide variety of ES indicators. Most assessments quantified ecosystem properties (59%), while a minority assessed actual benefits to people, recognized values or societal demands. To advance insights in the effectiveness of GBI, we recommend increased research attention towards i) increasing the coverage of less studied ES, GBI types and geographical regions, ii) quantifying actual benefits of GBI by comparing ES supply and societal demand, and iii) comparing effectiveness across different GBI types and in relation to grey infrastructure.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101367

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a dominance of studies on terrestrial NbS with relatively limited research on aquatic and marine NbS and their cobenefits.

    “Another dimension in the ecological challenge is the dominance of studies on terrestrial NbS with relatively limited research on aquatic and marine NbS and their cobenefits (34, 36).”

    From Global synthesis and regional insights for mainstreaming urban nature-based solutions (2025) · cites this paper as [34]

    Section 4.1 reports that blue infrastructure is underrepresented in the literature and describes its potential benefits. The review concerns urban green and blue infrastructure; it does not establish the same research imbalance for marine NbS or specifically for research on their cobenefits. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Several reviews highlight how certain types of NbS studied in the Global North are less relevant for the Global South.

    “Several reviews highlight how certain types of NbS studied in the Global North are less relevant for the Global South (34).”

    From Global synthesis and regional insights for mainstreaming urban nature-based solutions (2025) · cites this paper as [34]

    Section 4.1 reports that urban green and blue infrastructure studies are concentrated in the Northern Hemisphere. Section 4.3 says cities in the Global South face different challenges and calls for research on infrastructure effectiveness there. The review does not establish that particular types studied in the Global North are less relevant in the Global South. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Global South cities were often noted as locations of knowledge gaps, with regionally appropriate knowledge generally scant on how to adapt local NbS to larger scales.

    “Global South cities were often noted as locations of knowledge gaps (27, 34, 37), with regionally appropriate knowledge generally scant on how to adapt local NbS to larger scales (38).”

    From Global synthesis and regional insights for mainstreaming urban nature-based solutions (2025) · cites this paper as [34]

    Section 4.3 (page not provided) calls for more region-specific evidence on urban green and blue infrastructure, particularly in the Global South, and says small-scale innovations are understudied. It does not address how to adapt local nature-based solutions to larger scales, which is the specific point attached to this citation. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Currently, NbS tend to be conceptualized in the Global North and replicated in the Global South, which ignores disparities in ecological and socioeconomic contexts.

    “Currently, NbS tend to be conceptualized in the Global North and replicated in the Global South, which ignores disparities in ecological and socioeconomic contexts (34, 46).”

    From Global synthesis and regional insights for mainstreaming urban nature-based solutions (2025) · cites this paper as [34]

    Section 4.1 reports that assessments of urban green and blue infrastructure are concentrated in the northern hemisphere. Section 4.3 says cities in the Global South face distinctly different challenges and calls for more research there. The paper does not say that NbS developed in the Global North are being replicated in the Global South, or that such replication ignores local contexts. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 2014. In: Urban Areas Climate Change 2014 -Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability: Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects: Working Group II Contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 535-612. https://doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9781107415379.013. · DOI
  2. MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment), 2005. Ecosystems and human wellbeing: a framework for assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC.
  3. aaa81a. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Veerkamp, C. J., Schipper, A. M., Hedlund, K., Lazarova, T., Nordin, A., & Hanson, H. I.
Affiliations
  • Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (NL)
  • Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Veerkamp, Clara J.
Venue
Ecosystem Services
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
52
Pages
101367
ISSN
2212-0416 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3202778908
Cited by
244
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 1
FWCI
12.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ecosystem Services (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (acceptedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (730243)
  • Swedish Research Council Formas (2016\u201000324)
  • European Commission
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Urban Green Space and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Urban Arborization and Environmental Studies
Keywords
urban sustainability, stormwater regulation, waste treatment, air pollution regulation, pollination, ecosystem service indicators, green spaces, parks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review