CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 13

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Digital finance and stock market participation: The case of internet wealth management products in China

Lu, Zhiqiang, Wu, Junjie, Li, Hongyu, Galloway, Brian·2024·Economic Systems
DOI 10.1016/j.ecosys.2023.101148
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecosys.2023.101148

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. Acharya, V., Qian, J., Su, Y., Yang, Z., 2021, In the shadow of banks: Wealth management products and issuing banks’ risk in China. (February 28, 2021). NYU Stern School of Business, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3401597 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3401597. · DOI
  2. Arrow, 1962, The economic consequences of learning by doing, Rev. Econ. Stud., 29, 155, 10.2307/2295952 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bajo, 2015, Financial literacy, households’ investment behaviour, and risk propensity., J. Financ. Manag., Mark. Inst., 3, 157
  4. Barber, 2002, Online investors: do the slow die first?, Rev. Financ. Stud., 15, 455, 10.1093/rfs/15.2.455 · DOI
  5. Bazley, 2021, Financial self-awareness: who knows what they don’t know?, Financ. Res. Lett., 38, 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101445 · DOI
  6. Bogan, 2008, Stock market participation and the internet, J. Financ. Quant. Anal., 43, 191, 10.1017/S0022109000002799 · DOI
  7. Bonaparte, 2013, Political activism, information costs, and stock market participation, J. Financ. Econ., 107, 760, 10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.09.012 · DOI
  8. Briggs, 2021, Windfall gains and stock market participation, J. Financ. Econ., 139, 57, 10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.07.014 · DOI
  9. Bucher-Koenen, 2011, Financial literacy and retirement planning in Germany, J. Pension.-. Econ. Financ., 10, 565, 10.1017/S1474747211000485 · DOI
  10. Calvet, 2007, Down or out: Assessing the welfare costs of household investment mistakes, J. Polit. Econ., 115, 707, 10.1086/524204 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Chen, 2018, The nexus of monetary policy and shadow banking in China, Am. Econ. Rev., 108, 3891, 10.1257/aer.20170133 · DOI
  12. Choi, 2002, How does the Internet increase trading? Evidence from investor behavior in 401(K) plans, J. Financ. Econ., 64, 397, 10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00130-7 · DOI
  13. Chou, 2010, Investor attitudes and behavior towards inherent risk and potential returns in financial products, Int. J. Financ. Econ., 44, 16
  14. Christelis, 2010, Cognitive abilities and portfolio choice, Eur. Econ. Rev., 54, 18, 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2009.04.001 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Feng, 2005, Do investor sophistication and trading experience eliminate behavioral biases in financial markets?, Rev. Financ., 9, 305, 10.1007/s10679-005-2262-0 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Giannetti, 2016, Corporate scandals and household stock market participation, J. Financ., 71, 2591, 10.1111/jofi.12399 · DOI
  17. Grable, 2019, A test of traditional and psychometric relative risk tolerance measures on household financial risk taking, Financ. Res. Lett., 30, 8, 10.1016/j.frl.2019.03.012 · DOI
  18. Grable, 2003, The development of a risk assessment instrument: A follow-up study, Financ. Serv. Res., 12, 257
  19. Grossman, 1977, A Bayesian approach to the production of information and learning by doing, Rev. Econ. Stud., 44, 533, 10.2307/2296906 · DOI
  20. Guiso, 2003, Household stockholding in Europe: where do we stand and where do we go?, Econ. Policy, 18, 123, 10.1111/1468-0327.00104 · DOI
  21. Guiso, 2005, Awareness and stock market participation, Rev. Financ., 9, 537, 10.1007/s10679-005-5000-8 · DOI
  22. Guiso, 2008, Trusting the stock market, J. Financ., 63, 2557, 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01408.x · DOI
  23. Hanna, 1997, Subjective and objective risk tolerance: implications for optimal portfolios, J. Financ. Couns. Plan., 8, 17
  24. Heaton, 2000, Portfolio choice in the presence of background risk, Econ. J., 110, 1, 10.1111/1468-0297.00488 · DOI
  25. Hong, 2004, Social interaction and stock‐market participation, J. Financ., 59, 137, 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00629.x · DOI
  26. Kumar, 2009, Who gambles in the stock market?, J. Financ., 64, 1889, 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01483.x · DOI
  27. Liu, 2020, Pandemic, mobile payment and household consumption: micro-evidence from China, Emerg. Mark. Financ. Trade, 56, 2378, 10.1080/1540496X.2020.1788539 · DOI
  28. Luo, 2019, Maturity mismatch and incentives: evidence from bank issued wealth management products in China, J. Bank. Financ., 107, 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2019.105615 · DOI
  29. Malmendier, 2011, Depression babies: do macroeconomic experiences affect risk taking?, Q. J. Econ., 126, 373, 10.1093/qje/qjq004 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Mankiw, 1991, The consumption of stockholders and nonstockholders, J. Financ. Econ., 29, 97, 10.1016/0304-405X(91)90015-C · DOI
  31. Mishra, 2018, Financial literacy, risk tolerance and stock market participation, Asian Econ. Financ. Rev., 8, 1457, 10.18488/journal.aefr.2018.812.1457.1471 · DOI
  32. Nicolosi, 2009, Do individual investors learn from their trading experience?, J. Financ. Mark., 12, 317, 10.1016/j.finmar.2008.07.001 · DOI
  33. Niu, 2020, Number of brothers, risk sharing, and stock market participation, J. Bank. Financ., 113, 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2020.105757 · DOI
  34. Ozili, 2018, Impact of digital finance on financial inclusion and stability, Borsa Istanb. Rev., 18, 329, 10.1016/j.bir.2017.12.003 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Perry, 2015, Wealth management products in China, RBA Bull. June, 59
  36. Rosenbaum, 1983, The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects, Biometrika, 70, 41, 10.1093/biomet/70.1.41 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Roszkowski, 2010, Risk perception and risk tolerance changes attributable to the 2008 economic crisis: a subtle but critical difference, J. Financ. Serv. Res. Prof., 64, 42
  38. Seru, 2010, Learning by trading, Rev. Financ Stud., 23, 705, 10.1093/rfs/hhp060 · DOI
  39. Tan, 2022, The effect of homeownership on migrant household savings: evidence from the removal of home purchase restrictions in China, Econ. Modell., 106, 10.1016/j.econmod.2021.105679 · DOI
  40. Wang, 2022, The positive side of bank wealth management products: evidence from bank lending rate, J. Financ. Stab., 58, 10.1016/j.jfs.2021.100950 · DOI
  41. Wood, 2004, Attitudes and trading behaviour of stock market investors: A segmentation approach, J. Behav. Financ., 5, 170, 10.1207/s15427579jpfm0503_5 · DOI
  42. Ye, 2021, Personalized recommendation for mobile internet wealth management based on user behavior data analysis, Sci. Program., 2021
  43. Zhao, 2022, Mobile payment and Chinese rural household consumption, China Econ. Rev., 71, 10.1016/j.chieco.2021.101719 · DOI
  44. Zou, 2019, Financial literacy, housing value and household financial market participation: evidence from urban China, China Econ. Rev., 55, 52, 10.1016/j.chieco.2019.03.008 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lu, Z., Wu, J., Li, H., & Galloway, B.
Venue
Economic Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-03
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
101148
ISSN
0939-3625
DOI
10.1016/j.ecosys.2023.101148
Cited by
13
References
2
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • Chinese National Funding of Social Sciences (20BJY158)
  • National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review