The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rater calibration when observational assessment occurs at large scale: Degree of calibration and characteristics of raters associated with calibration
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is very little research on how best to train raters to use observational instruments consistently.
“In addition, there is very little research on how best to train raters to use the observational instruments consistently (Cash et al., 2012).”
From Exploring Differences in Measurement and Reporting of Classroom Observation Inter-Rater Reliability (2018) · cites this paper as Cash et al., 2012
Citations
Cites
Using SAS PROC MIXED to Fit Multilevel Models, Hierarchical Models, and Individual Growth Models
Singer, J. D. (1998) · Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics · doi:10.2307/1165280 · Cited by 1,092
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- Arnett, 1989, Caregivers in day-care centers: Does training matter, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 10, 541, 10.1016/0193-3973(89)90026-9 · DOI
- Burchinal, 2008, Predicting child outcomes at the end of kindergarten from the quality of pre-kindergarten teacher–child interactions and instruction, Applied Developmental Science, 12, 140, 10.1080/10888690802199418 · DOI
- Burchinal, 2010, Threshold analysis of association between child care quality and child outcomes for low-income children in pre-kindergarten programs, Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25, 166, 10.1016/j.ecresq.2009.10.004 · DOI
- Clifford, 2005, What is pre-kindergarten? Characteristics of public pre-kindergarten programs, Applied Developmental Science, 9, 126, 10.1207/s1532480xads0903_1 · DOI
- Cohen, 1968, Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit, Psychological Bulletin, 70, 213, 10.1037/h0026256 · DOI · Paper page
- Colvin, 2009, Using observational data to provide performance feedback to teachers: A high school case study, Preventing School Failure, 53, 95, 10.3200/PSFL.53.2.95-104 · DOI
- Curby, 2009, The relations of observed pre-K classroom quality profiles to children's achievement and social competence, Early Education & Development, 20, 346, 10.1080/10409280802581284 · DOI
- Dickinson, 2007, Building support for language and early literacy in preschool classrooms through in-service professional development: Effects of the Literacy Environment Enrichment Program (LEEP), Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 22, 243, 10.1016/j.ecresq.2007.03.001 · DOI
- Fleiss, 1973, The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability, Educational and Pyschological Measurement, 33, 613, 10.1177/001316447303300309 · DOI · Paper page
- Graham, 2009, Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world, Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 6.1, 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530 · DOI · Paper page
- Hamre, 2005, Can instructional and emotional support in the first-grade classroom make a difference for children at risk of school failure?, Child Development, 76, 949, 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00889.x · DOI · Paper page
- Hintze, 2005, Psychometrics of direct observation, School Psychology Review, 34, 507, 10.1080/02796015.2005.12088012 · DOI
- Howes, 2008, Ready to learn? Children's pre-academic achievement in pre-Kindergarten programs, Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 27, 10.1016/j.ecresq.2007.05.002 · DOI
- Landis, 1977, The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data, Biometrics, 33, 159, 10.2307/2529310 · DOI · Paper page
- LoCasale-Crouch, 2007, Observed classroom quality profiles in state-funded pre-kindergarten programs and associations with teacher, program, and classroom characteristics, Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 22, 3, 10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.05.001 · DOI
- Mashburn, 2008, Measures of classroom quality in prekindergarten and children's development of academic, language, and social skills, Child Development, 79, 732, 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01154.x · DOI
- Moon, 2005, Training and scoring issues involved in large-scale writing assessments, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 21, 15, 10.1111/j.1745-3992.2002.tb00088.x · DOI
- NICHD ECCRN, 2005, A day in third grade: A large-scale study of classroom quality and teacher and student behavior, Elementary School Journal, 105, 305, 10.1086/428746 · DOI
- NICHD ECCRN, 2006, Child-care effect sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development, American Psychologist, 61, 99, 10.1037/0003-066X.61.2.99 · DOI
- Penny, 2003, Reading high stakes writing samples: My life as a reader, Assessing Writing, 8, 192, 10.1016/j.asw.2003.08.001 · DOI
- Pianta, 2009, Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: Standardized observation can leverage capacity, Educational Researcher, 38, 109, 10.3102/0013189X09332374 · DOI · Paper page
- Pianta, 2005, Features of pre-kindergarten programs, classrooms, and teachers: Do they predict observed classroom quality and child-teacher interactions?, Applied Developmental Science, 9, 144, 10.1207/s1532480xads0903_2 · DOI
- Raudenbush, 2008, Statistical inference when classroom quality is measured with error, Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1, 138, 10.1080/19345740801982104 · DOI
- Rimm-Kaufman, 2009, The contribution of children's self-regulation and classroom quality to children's adaptive behaviors in the kindergarten classroom, Developmental Psychology, 45, 958, 10.1037/a0015861 · DOI
- Schafer, 2005, Resistance to confounding style and content in scoring constructed-response items, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 24, 22, 10.1111/j.1745-3992.2005.00008.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rater Performance Standards for Classroom Observation Instruments
White, M. C. (2018) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x18785623 · Cited by 32
Exploring Differences in Measurement and Reporting of Classroom Observation Inter-Rater Reliability
Wilhelm, A. G., Rouse, A. G., & Jones, F. (2018) · University of Massachusetts Amherst · doi:10.7275/at67-md25 · Cited by 20
Weston, T. J., Hayward, C. N., & Laursen, S. L. (2021) · American Journal of Evaluation · doi:10.1177/1098214020931941 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Cash, A. H., Hamre, B. K., Pianta, R. C., & Myers, S. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Virginia (US)
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cash, Anne H.
- Venue
- Early Childhood Research Quarterly
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-07
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 529-542
- ISSN
- 0885-2006 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2080938179
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 5.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Early Childhood Research Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- rater calibration, observational assessment, Classroom Assessment Scoring System, rater training, teacher effectiveness, early childhood education, Head Start, large-scale assessment, rater characteristics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review