Cited by 104Optimal Experimental Design MethodsEducational Research and MethodsPsychology Research and Bibliometrics

The use of Latin-square designs in educational and psychological research

Richardson, John T.E.·2018·Educational Research Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.edurev.2018.03.003

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Richardson, J. T. E.
Affiliations
The Open University (GB)
Corresponding author
Richardson, John T.E.
Venue
Educational Research Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
24
Pages
84-97
ISSN
1747-938X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2791237780
Cited by
104
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2021-02-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Educational Research Review (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Online (The Open University) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Optimal Experimental Design Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
Keywords
Latin square design, experimental design, randomization, data analysis, educational research, psychology research, factorial design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review