Cited by 180Online Learning and AnalyticsProblem and Project Based LearningIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

Supervised machine learning in multimodal learning analytics for estimating success in project-based learning.

Open access
Spikol, Daniel, Ruffaldi, Emanuele, Dabisias, Giacomo, Cukurova, Mutlu·2018·Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

Abstract

Multimodal learning analytics provides researchers new tools and techniques to capture different types of data from complex learning activities in dynamic learning environments. This paper investigates the use of diverse sensors, including computer vision, user‐generated content, and data from the learning objects (physical computing components), to record high‐fidelity synchronised multimodal recordings of small groups of learners interacting. We processed and extracted different aspects of the students' interactions to answer the following question: Which features of student group work are good predictors of team success in open‐ended tasks with physical computing? To answer this question, we have explored different supervised machine learning approaches (traditional and deep learning techniques) to analyse the data coming from multiple sources. The results illustrate that state‐of‐the‐art computational techniques can be used to generate insights into the "black box" of learning in students' project‐based activities. The features identified from the analysis show that distance between learners' hands and faces is a strong predictor of students' artefact quality, which can indicate the value of student collaboration. Our research shows that new and promising approaches such as neural networks, and more traditional regression approaches can both be used to classify multimodal learning analytics data, and both have advantages and disadvantages depending on the research questions and contexts being investigated. The work presented here is a significant contribution towards developing techniques to automatically identify the key aspects of students success in project‐based learning environments, and to ultimately help teachers provide appropriate and timely support to students in these fundamental aspects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jcal.12263

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The research focus on deploying AI in education is also shifting from a single domain to a cross-disciplinary approach through collaboration and domain transfers.

    “it is also shifting from a single domain (e.g., domain expertise, or expert systems) to a cross-disciplinary approach through collaboration”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Abadi, M., Barham, P., Chen, J., Chen, Z., Davis, A., Dean, J., . . . Isard, M., et al. (2016). Tensorflow: A system for large-scale machine learning. In Proceedings of the 12th usenix symposium on operating systems design and implementation (osdi). savannah, georgia, usa.
  2. Dewey, J. (1959), In Dewey on education. New York: Teachers College Press.
  3. Ochoa, X., Worsley, M., Chiluiza, K., & Luz, S. (2014). Mla'14: Third multimodal learning analytics workshop and grand challenges. Proceedings of the 16th. Retrieved October 15, 2016, from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2668318

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spikol, D., Ruffaldi, E., Dabisias, G., & Cukurova, M.
Affiliations
  • Malmö University (SE)
  • Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna (IT)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Spikol, Daniel
Venue
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-05-15
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
366-377
ISSN
  • 0266-4909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2729
OpenAlex
W2803274219
Cited by
180
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 4
FWCI
19.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Computer Assisted Learning (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Malmö University Publications (Malmö University) (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies) (submittedVersion)
Funders
FP7 People: Marie-Curie Actions (619738)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Keywords
multimodal learning analytics, project-based learning, student cooperation, physical computing, computer vision, user-generated content, learning objects, group work, deep learning, artificial neural networks, regression analysis, teacher support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review