Strengths, Weaknessness, Opportunities and Threats Analysis of Bioenergy Production on Marginal Land
Open accessAbstract
Planting energy crops on marginal land is a potentially attractive way for bioenergy production that retains better land for food crops and offers a new source of income to poor farmers. Although such lands would be less productive and subject to higher risks, their use for bioenergy plantations could have secondary benefits, such as restoration of degraded vegetation, carbon sequestration and local environmental services. In most countries, however, the suitability of this land for sustainable biofuel production is poorly documented. We summarized and defined the marginal land and then applied the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT) analysis to diagnose and identify the economic, environmental and social impacts from bioenergy production on marginal land. The results show the strengths include land available, energy crop adaptability and rural economy development, while the weaknesses include economic viability, environmental impacts, and equity and gender concerns. The renewable energy planning target, consideration of food security, biofuel policies and technology development will create the external environment to promote bioenergy production on marginal land, but also rise in fuel price and higher labour cost, natural hazards as well as crisis on financial market will be the threats.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The use of biomass produced on marginal land for energy could result in a positive environmental impact on national GHG emissions.
“the use of biomass produced on marginal land for energy could result in a positive environmental impact on national GHG emissions.”
From Bioenergy production and environmental impacts (2018) · cites this paper as Liu et al. (2011)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Strategic development and SWOT analysis at the University of Warwick
Dyson, R. G. (2003) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00062-6 · Cited by 753 · see citing works
The global potential of bioenergy on abandoned agriculture lands
Campbell, J. E., Lobell, D. B., Genova, R. C., & Field, C. B. (2008) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es800052w · Cited by 709 · see citing works
Marginal lands in Europe—causes of decline
Strijker, D. (2005) · Basic and Applied Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.baae.2005.01.001 · Cited by 473 · see citing works
SWOT analyses of the national energy sector for sustainable energy development
Markovska, N., Taseska, V., & Pop-Jordanov, J. (2009) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2009.02.006 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Hoogwijk, M. M., Faaij, A. P. C., de Vries, B. J. M., & Turkenburg, W. C. (2008) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.04.005 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Marginal land‐based biomass energy production in China
Tang, Y., Xie, J., & Geng, S. (2010) · Journal of Integrative Plant Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7909.2010.00903.x · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Assessment of Biomass Resources from Marginal Lands in APEC Economies
Milbrandt, A. R., & Overend, R. P. (2009) · doi:10.2172/968464 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Potential yields of bio-ethanol from energy crops and their regional distribution in China.
LiangZheng, Y., Zhang, L., Wang, S., & Hu, L. (2008) · Nongye gongcheng xuebao · doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2008.5.030 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Varela, M., Lechón, Y., & Saez, R. (1999) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/s0961-9534(99)00058-6 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Use of marginal land and water to maximize biofuel production
Gopalakrishnan, G., Negri, M. C., Wang, M., et al. (2008) · Cited by 9 · see citing works
The Study on the Development of Bio-energy Industry in China
Qi, M. (2009) · Ecological Economy · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Second Generation Feedstocks for Biofuels Suitable for Production in North West Victoria
Cadmore, R. (2009) · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Wiegmann K, Hennenberg KJ, Fritsche UR. Degraded Land and Sustainable Bioenergy Feedstock Production. Joint International Workshop on High Nature Value Criteria and Potential for Sustainable Use of Degraded Lands, Paris, June30-July1,2008, p.3.
- Yan LZ, Zhang L, Wang SQ, Hu L Potential yield of bioethanol from energy crops and their regional distribution in China. Trans.Chin. Sci. Agr. Eng. 2008; 24: 213-216.
- Swaan J. SWOT on Bioenergy for North America. Bioenergy. Conference and Exhibition 2010. Prince George, British Columbia, June9-10,2010, p.3-4.
- Lu L, T ang Y, Xie JS, Yuan YL The role of marginal agricultural land-based mulberry plantation in biomass energy production.Renewable Energy 2009; 34: 1789-1794.
- Dauber J, Jones M, Styles D, T urner. Social-economic and environmental implications of energy crop production in Europe-So litter land and so many services. European Science Foundation Exploratory Workshop, Dublin, April 26-28, 2010,p.14.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Patel, M., Zhang, X., & Kumar, A. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.070 · Cited by 535 · see citing works
Marginal Agricultural Land Low-Input Systems for Biomass Production
Von Cossel, M., Lewandowski, I., Elbersen, B., Staritsky, I., Van Eupen, M., Iqbal, Y., Mantel, S., Scordia, D., Testa, G., Cosentino, S. L., et al. (2019) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en12163123 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Bioenergy production and environmental impacts
Wu, Y., Zhao, F., Liu, S., Wang, L., Qiu, L., Alexandrov, G., & Jothiprakash, V. (2018) · Geoscience Letters · doi:10.1186/s40562-018-0114-y · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Liu, T., Huffman, T., Kulshreshtha, S., McConkey, B., Du, Y., Green, M., Liu, J., Shang, J., & Geng, X. (2017) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.07.126 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Self-citationEmery, I., Mueller, S., Qin, Z., & Dunn, J. B. (2017) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b04189 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Hydrologic and water quality impacts and biomass production potential on marginal land
Feng, Q., Chaubey, I., Her, Y. G., Cibin, R., Engel, B., Volenec, J., & Wang, X. (2015) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.07.004 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Mamirova, A., & Pidlisnyuk, V. (2024) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy14040791 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Potentials of biomass and renewable energy: the question of sustainable availability
Roth, A., Riegel, F., & Batteiger, V. (2018) · Biokerosene · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-53065-8_6 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Liu, T. T., McConkey, B. G., Ma, Z. Y., Liu, Z. G., Li, X., & Cheng, L. L.
- Affiliations
- Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA)
- Renmin University of China (CN)
- Corresponding author
- McConkey, B.G.
- Venue
- Energy Procedia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 5
- Pages
- 2378-2386
- ISSN
- 1876-6102 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1979302837
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 89.05
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Energy Procedia (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
- Keywords
- bioenergy, marginal land, energy crops, biofuels, SWOT analysis, food security, carbon sequestration, environmental impact, economic feasibility, rural development, biofuel policy, land use, gender equity, natural hazards
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review