The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Techno-Economic Assessment of Power-to-Liquids (PtL) Fuels Production and Global Trading Based on Hybrid PV-Wind Power Plants
Open accessAbstract
This paper introduces a value chain design for transportation fuels and a respective business case taking into account hybrid PV-Wind power plants, electrolysis and hydrogen-to-liquids (H 2 tL) based on hourly resolved full load hours (FLh). The value chain is based on renewable electricity (RE) converted by power-to-liquids (PtL) facilities into synthetic fuels, mainly diesel. Results show that the proposed RE-diesel value chains are competitive for crude oil prices within a minimum price range of about 79 - 135 USD/barrel (0.44 – 0.75 €/l of diesel production cost), depending on the chosen specific value chain and assumptions for cost of capital, available oxygen sales and CO 2 emission costs. A sensitivity analysis indicates that the RE-PtL value chain needs to be located at the best complementing solar and wind sites in the world combined with a de-risking strategy and a special focus on mid to long-term electrolyser and H 2 tL efficiency improvements. The substitution of fossil fuels by hybrid PV-Wind power plants could create a PV-wind market potential in the order of terawatts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Carbon dioxide utilisation for production of transport fuels: process and economic analysis
Dimitriou, I., García-Gutiérrez, P., Elder, R. H., Cuéllar-Franca, R. M., Azapagic, A., & Allen, R. W. K. (2015) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c4ee04117h · Cited by 301
Power-to-Gas as an Emerging profitable business through creating an integrated value chain
Breyer, C., Tsupari, E., Tikka, V., & Vainikka, P. (2015) · Energy Procedia · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.668 · Cited by 120
Self-citation
Cited by
Bogdanov, D., Ram, M., Aghahosseini, A., Gulagi, A., Oyewo, A. S., Child, M., Caldera, U., Sadovskaia, K., Farfan, J., De Souza Noel Simas Barbosa, L., et al. (2021) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.120467 · Cited by 955
Self-citationPotential and risks of hydrogen-based e-fuels in climate change mitigation
Ueckerdt, F., Bauer, C., Dirnaichner, A., Everall, J., Sacchi, R., & Luderer, G. (2021) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-021-01032-7 · Cited by 709
Role of Long-Duration Energy Storage in Variable Renewable Electricity Systems
Dowling, J. A., Rinaldi, K. Z., Ruggles, T. H., Davis, S. J., Yuan, M., Tong, F., Lewis, N. S., & Caldeira, K. (2020) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2020.07.007 · Cited by 656
Climate change mitigation potential of carbon capture and utilization in the chemical industry
Kätelhön, A., Meys, R., Deutz, S., Suh, S., & Bardow, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1821029116 · Cited by 643
Probabilistic feasibility space of scaling up green hydrogen supply
Odenweller, A., Ueckerdt, F., Nemet, G. F., Jensterle, M., & Luderer, G. (2022) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-022-01097-4 · Cited by 526
Metadata
- Authors
- Fasihi, M., Bogdanov, D., & Breyer, C.
- Venue
- Energy Procedia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-11
- Volume
- 99
- Pages
- 243-268
- ISSN
- 1876-6102 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2556445259
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.84
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Techno-Economic Assessment of Power-to-Liquids (PtL) Fuels Production and Global Trading Based on Hybrid PV-Wind Power Plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.10.115
- The paper
- Fasihi, M., Bogdanov, D., & Breyer, C. (2016). Techno-Economic Assessment of Power-to-Liquids (PtL) Fuels Production and Global Trading Based on Hybrid PV-Wind Power Plants. Energy Procedia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.10.115
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.