The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A critical review of seven selected neighborhood sustainability assessment tools
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Brundtland, G. H. (1991) · Earth and Us · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-1049-0.50009-5 · Cited by 12,174
An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies
Singh, R. K., Murty, H. R., Gupta, S. K., & Dikshit, A. K. (2009) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.05.011 · Cited by 2,069
United Nations Conference on Environment and Development
Weiss, E. B. (1992) · International Legal Materials · doi:10.1017/s0020782900014716 · Cited by 1,433
An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies
Singh, R. K., Murty, H. R., Gupta, S. K., & Dikshit, A. K. (2012) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.01.007 · Cited by 1,216
Environmental Impact Assessment
(2020) · Planning Enforcement · doi:10.5040/9781526506757.chapter-009 · Cited by 1,105
C HARACTERIZING AND M EASURING S USTAINABLE D EVELOPMENT
Parris, T. M., & Kates, R. W. (2003) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105551 · Cited by 885
Case study research: a multi‐faceted research approach for IS
Cavaye, A. L. M. (1996) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.1996.tb00015.x · Cited by 766
Sustainability Indicators: measuring the immeasurable?
(2009) · International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education · doi:10.1108/ijshe.2009.24910bae.002 · Cited by 604
Hacking, T., & Guthrie, P. (2008) · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2007.03.002 · Cited by 566
Sustainable community development: integrating environmental, economic, and social objectives
Roseland, M. (2000) · Progress in Planning · doi:10.1016/s0305-9006(00)00003-9 · Cited by 536
Cited by
Smart sustainable cities of the future: An extensive interdisciplinary literature review
Bibri, S. E., & Krogstie, J. (2017) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2017.02.016 · Cited by 1,599
What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities?
Ahvenniemi, H., Huovila, A., Pinto-Seppä, I., & Airaksinen, M. (2017) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.009 · Cited by 1,378
Principles and criteria for assessing urban energy resilience: a literature review
Sharifi, A., & Yamagata, Y. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.028 · Cited by 592
Self-citationEnhancing sustainable urban development through smart city applications
Angelidou, M., Psaltoglou, A., Komninos, N., Kakderi, C., Tsarchopoulos, P., & Panori, A. (2018) · Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management · doi:10.1108/jstpm-05-2017-0016 · Cited by 399
Smart sustainable cities – Exploring ICT solutions for reduced energy use in cities
Kramers, A., Höjer, M., Lövehagen, N., & Wangel, J. (2014) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.12.019 · Cited by 373
Metadata
- Authors
- Sharifi, A., & Murayama, A.
- Venue
- Environmental Impact Assessment Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 38
- Pages
- 73-87
- ISSN
- 0195-9255 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1987037390
- Cited by
- 607
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 51.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A critical review of seven selected neighborhood sustainability assessment tools. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eiar.2012.06.006
- The paper
- Sharifi, A., & Murayama, A. (2013). A critical review of seven selected neighborhood sustainability assessment tools. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2012.06.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
