Cited by 373Smart Cities and TechnologiesGreen IT and SustainabilityClimate Change and Sustainable Development

Smart sustainable cities – Exploring ICT solutions for reduced energy use in cities

Kramers, Anna, Höjer, Mattias, Lövehagen, Nina, Wangel, Josefin·2014·Environmental Modelling & Software

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.12.019

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kramers, A., Höjer, M., Lövehagen, N., & Wangel, J.
Affiliations
  • KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
  • Ericsson (Sweden) (SE)
Corresponding author
Kramers, Anna
Venue
Environmental Modelling & Software
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-06
Volume
56
Pages
52-62
ISSN
1364-8152 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1989813688
Cited by
373
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 4
FWCI
30.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Environmental Modelling & Software (publishedVersion)
Funders
VINNOVA
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Smart Cities and Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Green IT and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Sustainable Development
Keywords
smart cities, sustainable cities, information and communication technologies, energy consumption reduction, household energy consumption, analytical framework, household functions, ICT investment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review