Cited by 12Ethics in Clinical ResearchBRCA gene mutations in cancerEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Regulatory aspects of genetic research with residual human tissue: Effective and efficient data coding

Schmidt, Marjanka K., Vermeulen, Eric, Tollenaar, Rob A.E.M., Veer, Laura J. Van’t, Leeuwen, Flora E. van·2009·European Journal of Cancer

Abstract

In a large retrospective cohort of breast cancer patients, BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations were analysed in DNA isolated from residual paraffin-embedded tissue samples. Because it was not feasible to ask individual for informed consent, a data and DNA coding protocol, based on the Dutch 'Code of Conduct', was developed. The corner stone of the protocol is that a trusted third party, in our case a notary, keeps the coding keys of clinical data and DNA. Because (re)linkage of the combined coded clinical and genotyping data (BRCA1/2) is only possible through the notary's keys, these can be considered to be comparable to anonymised data at the level of the researcher. Issues around retrospective genotyping of allegedly high-risk mutations and the coding procedure itself are discussed. Our protocol is an appropriate solution to safeguard the privacy of patients when using residual tissue or DNA of patients. Importantly, the coding procedure also allows re-linkage of new genotyping data or extended patient follow-up data to the valuable coded dataset.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.03.008

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmidt, M. K., Vermeulen, E., Tollenaar, R. A. E. M., Veer, L. J. V., & Leeuwen, F. E. V.
Affiliations
  • The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL)
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
Corresponding author
Leeuwen, Flora E. van
Venue
European Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-09
Volume
45
Issue
13
Pages
2376-2382
ISSN
0959-8049 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2092252504
Cited by
12
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • KWF Kankerbestrijding
  • Division of Materials Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
residual tissue, paraffin-embedded tissue, data encoding, DNA coding, informed consent, notaries, data anonymization, privacy preservation, BRCA1, BRCA2, breast cancer, research ethics, codes of conduct
MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms, Confidentiality, DNA Mutational Analysis, Female, Forms and Records Control, Humans, Informed Consent, Tissue Banks, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Germ-Line Mutation, BRCA1 Protein, BRCA2 Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review