Cited by 18BRCA gene mutations in cancerBreast Lesions and CarcinomasGenetic factors in colorectal cancer

Evaluation of the Dutch BRCA1/2 clinical genetic center referral criteria in an unselected early breast cancer population

Open access
van den Broek, Alexandra J, de Ruiter, Karen, van 't Veer, Laura J, Tollenaar, Rob A E M, van Leeuwen, Flora E, Verhoef, Senno, Schmidt, Marjanka K·2015·European Journal of Human Genetics

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic value of the Dutch Clinical Genetic Center (CGC) referral guidelines for BRCA1/2 mutation testing in 903 early breast cancer patients, unselected for family history, diagnosed in a cancer hospital before the age of 50 years in 1974-2002; most prevalent Dutch pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutations had been analyzed on coded DNA in a research setting. Forty-nine (5.4%) of the patients were proven to be BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. We found that 78% and 69% of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers identified met the criteria for referral to the CGC based on age, family history and synchronous multiple tumors; reflected by a combined sensitivity of 75.5% and specificity of 63.2%. More than half of the BRCA1 mutation carriers, that is, 58% had a triple-negative tumor. The highest AUC was obtained by shifting the age at diagnosis threshold criterion from 40 to 35 years and by adding a 'triple-negative breast cancer' criterion with an age threshold of 45 years; the specificity increased to 71.2%, whereas the sensitivity remained the same; that is, a referral of fewer patients will lead to the identification of at least the same number of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Two-thirds of the BRCA1/2 mutation carriers identified in this research setting had been referred for counseling and testing. Our results indicate that, awaiting a possibly more extended mutation screening of all breast cancer patients, the triple-negative status of a breast cancer should be added to the CGC referral criteria.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ejhg.2014.161

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. STOET-VGKNDutch CGC referral criteria (Stichting Opsporing Erfelijke Tumoren –Vereniging Klinische Genetica Nederland (STOET-VGKN) criteria), edition 1996 and 2001.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van den Broek, A. J., de Ruiter, K., van 't Veer, L. J., Tollenaar, R. A. E. M., van Leeuwen, F. E., Verhoef, S., & Schmidt, M. K.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
  • The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL)
Corresponding author
Schmidt, Marjanka K
Venue
European Journal of Human Genetics
Published
2014-08-20
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
588-595
ISSN
  • 1018-4813 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5438
OpenAlex
W2058963482
Cited by
18
References
39
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Human Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
KWF Kankerbestrijding (DCS-NKI 2009-4363, 2007-3839, DCS-NKI 2001‐2423, NKI 2009-4363, DCS-NKI 2007-3839, 2009 4363, NKI 2007–3839)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Keywords
BRCA1, BRCA2, hereditary breast cancer, early breast cancer, mutation testing, triple-negative breast cancer, diagnostic accuracy, family history (medicine), mutation carriers
MeSH terms
Adult, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Genetic Testing, Heterozygote, Humans, Middle Aged, Mutation, Neoplasm Staging, Netherlands, Referral and Consultation, Retrospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Biomarkers, Tumor, Reproducibility of Results, Germ-Line Mutation, Genes, BRCA1, Genes, BRCA2, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review