Cited by 3Mass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry StudiesComputational Drug Discovery Methods

Combination of MS Binding Assays and affinity selection mass spectrometry for screening of structurally homogenous libraries as exemplified for a focused oxime library addressing the neuronal GABA transporter 1

Gabriel, Jürgen, Höfner, Georg, Wanner, Klaus T.·2020·European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Abstract

This study presents an efficient screening approach based on combination of mass spectrometry (MS) based binding assays (MS Binding Assays) and affinity selection mass spectrometry (ASMS) customized for screening of structurally homogeneous libraries sharing a common mass spectrometric fragmentation pattern. After reaction of a nipecotic acid derivative possessing a hydroxylamine functionality with aldehydes, the resulting oxime library was screened accordingly toward the GABA transporter subtype 1 (GAT1), a drug target for several neurological disorders. After assessing sublibraries' activities for inhibition of reporter ligand binding, hits in active ones were directly identified. This could be achieved by recording mass transitions for the reporter ligand as well as those predicted for the library components in a single LC-MS/MS run with a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer in the multiple reaction monitoring mode. Identification of hits with a predefined affinity could be reliably accomplished by calculation of IC 50-values from specific binding concentrations of library constituents and reporter ligand. Application of this strategy revealed six hits, from which two of them were resynthesized for further biological evaluation. Thereby, the best one displayed a pK i of 7.38 in MS Binding Assays and a pIC 50 of 6.82 in [3 H]GABA uptake assays for GAT1.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112598

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gabriel, J., Höfner, G., & Wanner, K. T.
Affiliations
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Corresponding author
Wanner, Klaus T.
Venue
European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
206
Pages
112598
ISSN
0223-5234 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3045935278
Cited by
3
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
GABA transporter 1, affinity selection-mass spectrometry, high-throughput screening, GABA uptake inhibition, hit identification, multiple reaction monitoring
MeSH terms
Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Humans, Ligands, Neurons, Oximes, Protein Binding, Mass Spectrometry, GABA Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review