Cited by 167Mass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies

Pulsed Ultrafiltration Mass Spectrometry: A New Method for Screening Combinatorial Libraries

van Breemen, Richard B., Huang, Chao-Ran, Nikolic, Dejan, Woodbury, Charles P., Zhao, Yong-Zhong, Venton, Duane L.·1997·Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

In response to the need for rapid screening of combinatorial libraries to identify new lead compounds during drug discovery, we have developed an on-line combination of ultrafiltration and electrospray mass spectrometry, called pulsed ultrafiltration mass spectrometry, which facilitates the identification of solution-phase ligands in library mixtures that bind to solution-phase receptors. After ligands contained in a library mixture were bound to a macromolecular receptor, e.g., human serum albumin or calf intestine adenosine deaminase, the ligand-receptor complexes were purified by ultrafiltration and then dissociated using methanol to elute the ligands into the electrospray mass spectrometer for detection. Ligands with dissociation constants in the micromolar to nanomolar range were successfully bound, released, and detected using this method, including warfarin, salicylate, furosemide, and thyroxine binding to human serum albumin, and erythro-9-(2-hydroxy-3-nonyl)adenine binding to calf intestine adenosine deaminase. Repetitive bind- and-release experiments demonstrated that the receptor could be reused. Thus, pulsed ultrafiltration mass spectrometry was shown to provide a simple and powerful new method for the screening of combinatorial libraries in support of new drug discovery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ac970132j

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Native MS detects ligands directly bound to a protein, whereas affinity MS approaches typically measure ligand binding indirectly as free compounds.

    “An important difference between native MS and affinity MS is that native MS detects ligands directly bound to a protein, whereas affinity MS approaches typically measure ligand binding indirectly as free compounds.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Breemen, R. B., Huang, C.-R., Nikolic, D., Woodbury, C. P., Zhao, Y.-Z., & Venton, D. L.
Affiliations
  • Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 833 South Wood Street, M/C 781, Chicago, Illinois 60612-7231
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Venue
Analytical Chemistry
Published
1997-06-01
Volume
69
Issue
11
Pages
2159-2164
ISSN
  • 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6882
OpenAlex
W2092397081
Cited by
167
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Analytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Keywords
combinatorial library screening, ligand-receptor binding, human serum albumin, lead compound identification, drug discovery, thyroxine binding, EHNA
MeSH terms
Adenine, Adenosine Deaminase, Methanol, Animals, Cattle, Enzyme Inhibitors, Furosemide, Humans, Intestines, Ligands, Molecular Weight, Online Systems, Pulsatile Flow, Salicylates, Serum Albumin, Mass Spectrometry, Thyroxine, Ultrafiltration, Warfarin, Drug Design, Salicylic Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review