The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Establishment and utilization of diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging: Results from a survey and consultation under the IAEA technical cooperation programme in Europe and Central Asia
Open accessAbstract
The paper presents the results of the activities under the IAEA Technical Cooperation programme in Europe and Central Asia, aiming to improve utilization of diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in the region through identifying status, problems, and gaps in establishing and utilization of the DRLs, and suggesting potential solutions. Status was identified through a survey with two electronic questionnaires answered by the regulatory bodies for radiation protection of 26 IAEA Member States and 34 representatives of relevant professional bodies of medical physics, radiology, nuclear medicine or radiographers. Problems, good practices and potential solutions were identified as a result of the discussion during a regional workshop with 50 nominated representatives of 21 countries. Results were disseminated through open webinars. Existing gaps are related to the lack of adequate regulations in some countries, inadequate awareness of radiological professionals of DRLs as a tool for optimization, insufficient cooperation among relevant stakeholders, education, and staffing. Strengthening of the cooperation between regulatory and professional bodies could benefit the awareness and consequently the utilization of DRLs in clinical practice. The need of improved education and training of the DRL process was highlighted. Improved inspection procedures and education of inspectors would also support the process. Access to clinically qualified medical physicists was found to be critical for the DRL utilization. Suggestions were placed for continuous IAEA assistance through training, guidance and expert support.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The IAEA provides support to countries via training workshops and organized survey instruments, underscoring that DRLs should align with local clinical practices instead than being directly imported from other countries.
“The IAEA provides support to countries via training workshops and organized survey instruments, underscoring that DRLs should align with local clinical practices instead than being directly imported from other countries.101”
From Computed Tomography Diagnostic Reference Levels Worldwide and in Jordan: Implications for Patient Dose Reduction (2026) · cites this paper as [101]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
International Atomic Energy Agency
(2022) · Permanent missions to the United Nations · doi:10.18356/9789210018289c237 · Cited by 3,884
International Commission on Radiological Protection
(1969) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/93.6.1298 · Cited by 2,148
The United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation
(1965) · Nature · doi:10.1038/206014c0 · Cited by 1,634
ICRP Publication 135: Diagnostic Reference Levels in Medical Imaging
Vañó, E., Miller, D. L., Martin, C. J., Rehani, M. M., Kang, K., Rosenstein, M., Ortiz-López, P., Mattsson, S., Padovani, R., & Rogers, A. (2017) · Annals of the ICRP · doi:10.1177/0146645317717209 · Cited by 1,043
Järvinen, H., Vassileva, J., Samei, E., Wallace, A., Vano, E., & Rehani, M. (2017) · Journal of Medical Imaging · doi:10.1117/1.jmi.4.3.031214 · Cited by 45
Self-citationRoch, P., Célier, D., Dessaud, C., et al. (2019) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-019-06422-2 · Cited by 45
Vassileva, J., Applegate, K. E., Paulo, G., Vano, E., & Holmberg, O. (2021) · Journal of Radiological Protection · doi:10.1088/1361-6498/ac40e9 · Cited by 28
Self-citationThe growing potential of diagnostic reference levels as a dynamic tool for dose optimization
Damilakis, J. E., & Vassileva, J. (2021) · Physica Medica · doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.03.018 · Cited by 26
Self-citationFoley, S. J., Paulo, G., & Vassileva, J. (2021) · Radiography · doi:10.1016/j.radi.2021.07.016 · Cited by 25
Self-citationMatsubara, K., Matsunaga, Y., Yanagawa, N., et al. (2018) · Japanese Journal of Radiological Technology · doi:10.6009/jjrt.2018_jsrt_74.7.700 · Cited by 4
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Union, 2014, Off J Eur Union L, 13, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Oglat, A., Shdaifat, S., Sayah, M., Abukonna, A., & Khogali, W. (2026) · Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety · doi:10.2147/dhps.s595721
Metadata
- Authors
- Faj, D., Edyvean, S., Lajunen, A., Katukhov, A., & Vassileva, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Osijek (HR)
- UK Health Security Agency (GB)
- Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (FI)
- International Atomic Energy Agency (AT)
- Corresponding author
- Faj, Dario
- Edyvean, Sue
- Lajunen, Atte
- Katukhov, Alexey
- Vassileva, Jenia
- Venue
- Physica Medica
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-04
- Volume
- 108
- Pages
- 102565
- ISSN
- 1120-1797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4361027711
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 3.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Physica Medica (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- International Atomic Energy Agency (RER9147)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiation Dose and Imaging
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiology practices and education
- Keywords
- diagnostic reference levels, diagnostic imaging, radiation protection, radiation dose optimization, regulatory agencies, medical physicists, professional awareness, stakeholder collaboration, Europe and Central Asia
- MeSH terms
- Diagnostic Reference Levels, Asia, Europe, Nuclear Medicine, Surveys and Questionnaires, Radiation Dosage, Referral and Consultation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review