Cited by 21Radiation Dose and ImagingAdvanced Radiotherapy TechniquesRadiology practices and education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Establishment and utilization of diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging: Results from a survey and consultation under the IAEA technical cooperation programme in Europe and Central Asia

Open access

Abstract

The paper presents the results of the activities under the IAEA Technical Cooperation programme in Europe and Central Asia, aiming to improve utilization of diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in the region through identifying status, problems, and gaps in establishing and utilization of the DRLs, and suggesting potential solutions. Status was identified through a survey with two electronic questionnaires answered by the regulatory bodies for radiation protection of 26 IAEA Member States and 34 representatives of relevant professional bodies of medical physics, radiology, nuclear medicine or radiographers. Problems, good practices and potential solutions were identified as a result of the discussion during a regional workshop with 50 nominated representatives of 21 countries. Results were disseminated through open webinars. Existing gaps are related to the lack of adequate regulations in some countries, inadequate awareness of radiological professionals of DRLs as a tool for optimization, insufficient cooperation among relevant stakeholders, education, and staffing. Strengthening of the cooperation between regulatory and professional bodies could benefit the awareness and consequently the utilization of DRLs in clinical practice. The need of improved education and training of the DRL process was highlighted. Improved inspection procedures and education of inspectors would also support the process. Access to clinically qualified medical physicists was found to be critical for the DRL utilization. Suggestions were placed for continuous IAEA assistance through training, guidance and expert support.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102565

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The IAEA provides support to countries via training workshops and organized survey instruments, underscoring that DRLs should align with local clinical practices instead than being directly imported from other countries.

    “The IAEA provides support to countries via training workshops and organized survey instruments, underscoring that DRLs should align with local clinical practices instead than being directly imported from other countries.101”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Union, 2014, Off J Eur Union L, 13, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Faj, D., Edyvean, S., Lajunen, A., Katukhov, A., & Vassileva, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Osijek (HR)
  • UK Health Security Agency (GB)
  • Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (FI)
  • International Atomic Energy Agency (AT)
Corresponding author
  • Faj, Dario
  • Edyvean, Sue
  • Lajunen, Atte
  • Katukhov, Alexey
  • Vassileva, Jenia
Venue
Physica Medica
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-04
Volume
108
Pages
102565
ISSN
1120-1797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4361027711
Cited by
21
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
FWCI
3.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physica Medica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
Funders
International Atomic Energy Agency (RER9147)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiation Dose and Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiology practices and education
Keywords
diagnostic reference levels, diagnostic imaging, radiation protection, radiation dose optimization, regulatory agencies, medical physicists, professional awareness, stakeholder collaboration, Europe and Central Asia
MeSH terms
Diagnostic Reference Levels, Asia, Europe, Nuclear Medicine, Surveys and Questionnaires, Radiation Dosage, Referral and Consultation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review