Patient dose monitoring and the use of diagnostic reference levels for the optimization of protection in medical imaging: current status and challenges worldwide
Open accessAbstract
Optimization is one of the key concepts of radiation protection in medical imaging. In practice, it involves compromising between the image quality and dose to the patient; the dose should not be higher than necessary to achieve an image quality (or diagnostic information) needed for the clinical task. Monitoring patient dose is a key requirement toward optimization. The concept of diagnostic reference level (DRL) was introduced by the International Commission on Radiological Protection as a practical tool for optimization. Unfortunately, this concept has not been applied consistently worldwide. To review the current strengths and weaknesses worldwide and to promote improvements, the International Atomic Energy Agency organized a Technical Meeting on patient dose monitoring and the use of DRLs on May 2016. This paper reports a summary of the findings and conclusions from the meeting. The strengths and weaknesses were generally different in less-developed countries compared with developed countries. Possible improvements were suggested in six areas: human resources and responsibilities, training, safety and quality culture, regulations, funding, and tools and methods. An overall conclusion was that radiation protection requires a patient-centric approach and a transfer from purely reactive to increasingly proactive optimization, whereby the best outcome is expected from good teamwork.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
International DRL programs enhance uniformity, safety, and quality assurance by establishing established benchmarks for radiation dosage levels.
“International DRL programs enhance uniformity, safety, and quality assurance by establishing established benchmarks for radiation dosage levels.96”
From Computed Tomography Diagnostic Reference Levels Worldwide and in Jordan: Implications for Patient Dose Reduction (2026) · cites this paper as [96]
DRLs provide a universal foundation for dosage optimization, but their application differs markedly among nations owing to variations in clinical practices, healthcare infrastructure, and regulatory contexts.
“While DRLs provide a universal foundation for dosage optimization, their application differs markedly among nations owing to variations in clinical practices, healthcare infrastructure, and regulatory contexts.96”
From Computed Tomography Diagnostic Reference Levels Worldwide and in Jordan: Implications for Patient Dose Reduction (2026) · cites this paper as [96]
Cites
Preface, Executive Summary and Glossary
(2007) · Annals of the ICRP · doi:10.1016/j.icrp.2007.10.003 · Cited by 2,116 · see citing works
ICRP Publication 135: Diagnostic Reference Levels in Medical Imaging
Vañó, E., Miller, D. L., Martin, C. J., Rehani, M. M., Kang, K., Rosenstein, M., Ortiz-López, P., Mattsson, S., Padovani, R., & Rogers, A. (2017) · Annals of the ICRP · doi:10.1177/0146645317717209 · Cited by 1,043 · see citing works
Self-citationRadiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards
Amano, Y. (2011) · Cited by 376 · see citing works
Radiation and your patient: A guide for medical practitioners
Valentin, J. (2001) · Annals of the ICRP · doi:10.1016/s0146-6453(02)00007-6 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Tsapaki, V., Aldrich, J. E., Sharma, R., et al. (2006) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2403050993 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
(1996) · PubMed · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Tsapaki, V., Ahmed, N. A., AlSuwaidi, J. S., et al. (2009) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.08.2115 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
(2007) · Annals of the ICRP · doi:10.1016/j.icrp.2008.08.001 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Muhogora, W. E., Ahmed, N. A., Almosabihi, A., et al. (2008) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.07.3039 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Diagnostic reference levels and complexity indices in interventional radiology: a national programme
Ruiz‐Cruces, R., Vano, E., Magariño, F. C., Moreno-Rodríguez, F., Soler, M. M., Canis, M., Hernández-Armas, J., Díaz-Romero, F., Espizua, F. J. R., Fernández, J. M., et al. (2016) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-016-4334-2 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Self-citationPaediatric CT examinations in 19 developing countries: frequency and radiation dose
Muhogora, W. E., Ahmed, N. A., AlSuwaidi, J. S., Beganović, A., Ciraj‐Bjelac, O., Gershan, V., Gershkevitsh, E., Gruppetta, E., Kharita, M. H., Manatrakul, N., et al. (2010) · Radiation Protection Dosimetry · doi:10.1093/rpd/ncq015 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Self-citationA study to establish international diagnostic reference levels for paediatric computed tomography
Vassileva, J., Rehani, M. M., Kostova-Lefterova, D. Z., AlNaemi, H., AlSuwaidi, J. S., Arandjic, D., Bashier, E., Renha, S. K., El-Nachef, L., Aguilar, J. G., et al. (2015) · Radiation Protection Dosimetry · doi:10.1093/rpd/ncv116 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Self-citationMuhogora, W. E., Ahmed, N. A., Beganović, A., et al. (2009) · Radiation Protection Dosimetry · doi:10.1093/rpd/ncp144 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Section, M. (2010) · International Atomic Energy Agency eBooks · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Faj, D., Edyvean, S., Lajunen, A., Katukhov, A., & Vassileva, J. (2023) · Physica Medica · doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102565 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationEstablishment of diagnostic reference levels in computed tomography in two large hospitals in Oman
Bouchareb, Y., Al-Maimani, A., Al-Balushi, A.-Y., Al-Kalbani, M., Al-Maskari, H., Al-Dhuhli, H., & Al-Kindi, F. (2023) · Radiation Protection Dosimetry · doi:10.1093/rpd/ncad225 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Aloufi, K. M., Gameraddin, M., Alhazmi, F. H., Almazroui, I. S., Osman, H., & Khandaker, M. U. (2025) · Applied Radiation and Isotopes · doi:10.1016/j.apradiso.2024.111583 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Oglat, A., Shdaifat, S., Sayah, M., Abukonna, A., & Khogali, W. (2026) · Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety · doi:10.2147/dhps.s595721
- Authors
- Järvinen, H., Vassileva, J., Samei, E., Wallace, A., Vano, E., & Rehani, M.
- Affiliations
- Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (FI)
- International Atomic Energy Agency (AT)
- Duke University (US)
- Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (AU)
- Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Imaging
- Publisher
- SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
- Published
- 2017-10-04
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 1-7
- ISSN
- 2329-4302 (ISSN-L)
- 2329-4310
- PMC
- PMC5627781
- OpenAlex
- W2764147527
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 2.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of medical imaging (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- International Atomic Energy Agency
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiation Dose and Imaging
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiology practices and education
- Keywords
- patient dose monitoring, diagnostic reference levels, radiation protection optimization, diagnostic imaging, ICRP, International Atomic Energy Agency, quality culture, radiation protection regulation, developing countries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review