Cited by 72Endometriosis Research and TreatmentReproductive Health and ContraceptionMigraine and Headache Studies

Progestogen-only contraceptive pill compared with combined oral contraceptive in the treatment of pain symptoms caused by endometriosis in patients with migraine without aura

Morotti, Matteo, Remorgida, Valentino, Venturini, Pier Luigi, Ferrero, Simone·2014·European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

Abstract

Objective Evaluate patient satisfaction at 6-month treatment in women with symptomatic rectovaginal endometriosis and migraine without aura with (progestogen-only contraceptive pill, POP versus sequential combined oral contraceptives, COC) STUDY DESIGN: A patient preference trial including 144 women (82 in the group COC and 62 in the group POP). Main outcome measure was the degree of patient satisfaction by using a Likert scale. Secondary objectives were to evaluate differences in endometriosis-related pain and changes in migraine features during the treatment.Results In group POP, 38/62 women (61.2%) were satisfied or very satisfied after treatment, compared to 31/82 women (37.8%) in group COC (p=0.005). The intensity of chronic pelvic pain and dyspareunia significantly decreased at 6-month treatment in both the groups. At 6-month treatment, the number of migraine attacks was lower than at baseline in group POP (p=0.002), while it was not reduced in group COC (p=0.521). The intensity of migraine attacks was significantly different between baseline and 6-month treatment in group POP (p<0.001) but not in group COC (p=0.078).Conclusions POP is better tolerated than COC and it seems to ameliorate migraine attacks compared to COC in symptomatic patients with rectovaginal endometriosis and migraine without aura. Both drugs efficaciously relieve endometriosis-related pain symptoms. This study supports the use of the POP in women with rectovaginal endometriosis and coexisting migraine without aura.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.05.016

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morotti, M., Remorgida, V., Venturini, P. L., & Ferrero, S.
Affiliations
Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (IT)
Venue
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-08
Volume
179
Pages
63-68
ISSN
  • 0028-2243 (ISSN-L)
  • 0301-2115
OpenAlex
W1966091296
Cited by
72
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3
FWCI
7.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Migraine and Headache Studies
Keywords
combined oral contraceptives, endometriosis, rectovaginal endometriosis, migraine without aura, endometriosis-associated pain, dyspareunia, patient satisfaction, migraine frequency, chronic pelvic pain, hormonal contraception
MeSH terms
Adult, Analgesics, Contraceptives, Oral, Combined, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Progestins, Treatment Outcome, Pelvic Pain, Migraine without Aura

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review