Cited by 62Endometriosis Research and TreatmentEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and ManagementGynecological conditions and treatments

Role of medical therapy in the management of deep rectovaginal endometriosis

Open access
Vercellini, Paolo, Buggio, Laura, Somigliana, Edgardo·2017·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Defining whether medical therapy is effective in women with deep rectovaginal endometriosis and in which circumstances it can be considered an alternative to surgery is important for patients and physicians. Numerous observational and some randomized controlled studies demonstrated that different hormonal drugs improved pain and other symptoms in approximately two-thirds of women with deep rectovaginal endometriosis. Because major differences in the effect size of various compounds were not observed, much importance should be given to safety, tolerability, and cost of medications when counseling patients. Progestins seem to offer the best therapeutic balance when long-term treatments are planned. Women should be informed that hormonal drugs control but do not cure endometriosis and that, to avoid surgery, they should be used for years. Medical therapy is not an alternative to surgery in women with hydronephrosis, severe subocclusive bowel symptoms, and in those wishing a natural conception. A progestin should systematically be chosen as a comparator in future randomized trials on novel medications for deep endometriosis. In the meantime, the use of existing drugs should be optimized, and medical and surgical treatments could be viewed as subsequent stages of a stepwise approach. In general, there is no absolute "best" choice, and women must be thoroughly informed of potential benefits, potential harms, and costs of different therapeutic options and allowed to choose what they deem is better for them.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.08.038

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vercellini, P., Buggio, L., & Somigliana, E.
Affiliations
University of Milan (IT)
Corresponding author
Vercellini, Paolo
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-12
Volume
108
Issue
6
Pages
913-930
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2773939391
Cited by
62
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
  • Ferring Pharmaceuticals
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
Keywords
medical therapy, hormone therapy, progestins, surgical management, hydronephrosis, bowel symptoms, spontaneous conception, stepwise treatment, patient counseling, drug safety and tolerability
MeSH terms
Animals, Biopsy, Colposcopy, Endometriosis, Endometrium, Estrogens, Female, Hormones, Humans, Progestins, Rectal Diseases, Vaginal Diseases, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review