Cited by 98Pregnancy and Medication ImpactPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesLiver Diseases and Immunity

Rifampicin in the treatment of severe intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy

Geenes, Victoria, Chambers, Jenny, Khurana, Rshmi, Shemer, Elisabeth Wikstrom, Sia, Winnie, Mandair, Dalvinder, Elias, Elwyn, Marschall, Hanns-Ulrich +2 more·2015·European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

Abstract

Objective To describe the use of combined ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and rifampicin treatment in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP). Study design A questionnaire survey of 27 women with 28 affected pregnancies identified via the UK and International Obstetric Medicine forum. The clinical case notes of women with ICP treated with combined UDCA and rifampicin therapy were reviewed, and data regarding maternal and perinatal outcomes extracted. Results Serum bile acids remained high whilst taking UDCA as monotherapy. In 14 pregnancies (54%) serum bile acids decreased following the introduction of rifampicin. In 10 pregnancies (38%), there was a 50% reduction in serum bile acids. There were no adverse effects reported with either drug. Conclusions This is the first report of the use of rifampicin in ICP. The data suggest that combined treatment with UDCA and rifampicin is an effective way of treating women with severe ICP who do not respond to treatment with UDCA alone.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.03.020

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Geenes, V., Chambers, J., Khurana, R., Shemer, E. W., Sia, W., Mandair, D., Elias, E., Marschall, H.-U., Hague, W., & Williamson, C.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
Corresponding author
Williamson, Catherine
Venue
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
189
Pages
59-63
ISSN
  • 0028-2243 (ISSN-L)
  • 0301-2115
OpenAlex
W2109866339
Cited by
98
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6
FWCI
10.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer Research
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
Keywords
intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, rifampicin, ursodeoxycholic acid, serum bile acids, treatment response, maternal outcomes, perinatal outcomes, adverse drug reactions
MeSH terms
Bile Acids and Salts, Cholestasis, Intrahepatic, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Gestational Age, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Outcome, Rifampin, Ursodeoxycholic Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review