Cited by 50Cancer survivorship and carePain Management and Opioid UsePalliative and Oncologic Care

Gender differences in predicting quality of life in cancer patients with pain

Pud, Dorit·2011·European Journal of Oncology Nursing

Abstract

Purpose Numerous studies have identified several factors influencing quality of life (QOL) in cancer patients. However, studies on gender differences in cancer-related physical symptoms and QOL levels have yielded inconsistent results. The present study examined common symptoms (i.e., pain intensity, fatigue, and depression) in regard to their ability to predict QOL in male and female oncology patients with cancer pain.Method A total of 114 oncology outpatients, including 34 males and 80 females, with pain completed a demographic questionnaire, the Multidimensional Quality of Life Scale - Cancer, the Lee Fatigue Scale, the Center for Epidemiological Studies - Depression Scale, and a numeric rating scale for pain intensity.Results The female patients reported significantly lower psychological dimension of QOL than their male counterparts (p=0.009). Also for the females, a negative correlation was found between pain intensity and QOL (r=-0.504, p<0.0001), as well as positive correlations between pain intensity and fatigue (r=0.421, p<0.0001) and depression (r=0.368, p<0.0001). Stepwise linear regression analyses showed that among the females, QOL was significantly predicted by pain intensity as well as by depression (F((2,75))=52.62, p<0.0001, Adj. R(2)=0.57). However, among the males, depression was the only symptom found to predict QOL (F((2,30))=9.72, p<0.001, Adj. R(2)=0.39).Conclusion Therefore, it is concluded that gender should be considered as an additional feature for further characterizing QOL. Gender differences in factors predicting QOL warrant different clinical approaches to male and female patients, and identifying these differences may assist health care providers in tailoring treatment modalities to individual patients for optimal outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejon.2010.12.005

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pud, D.
Affiliations
University of Haifa (IL)
Corresponding author
Pud, Dorit
Venue
European Journal of Oncology Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
486-491
ISSN
1462-3889 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2059346559
Cited by
50
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Oncology Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
gender differences, quality of life, cancer pain, pain intensity, fatigue, depression, cancer patients, psychological well-being, predictors of quality of life
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Pain, Pain Measurement, Quality of Life, Severity of Illness Index, Sex Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review