Cited by 54Cancer survivorship and careSmoking Behavior and CessationLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Patient views on smoking, lung cancer, and stigma: A focus group perspective

Lehto, Rebecca H.·2014·European Journal of Oncology Nursing

Abstract

Purpose Patients with lung cancer, the leading cause of cancer death, are shown to have high levels of psychological distress and poorer quality of life as compared to patients with other cancer types. The purpose of this paper is to describe patient focus group discussions about the lung cancer experience in relation to perceived stigmatization, smoking behaviors, and illness causes; and to discuss implications of these findings relative to the role of the nurse as a patient advocate.Methods and sample Eleven adult lung cancer patients participated in audio taped focus group sessions. Discussion questions probed patient perceptions of lung cancer challenges and adaptation issues.Results Six primary themes from the qualitative analysis included: 1) societal attitudes; 2) institutional practices and experiences; 3) negative thoughts and emotions such as guilt, self-blame and self-deprecation, regret, and anger; 4) actual stigmatization experiences; 5) smoking cessation: personal choices versus addiction; and 6) causal attributions.Conclusions Patients with lung cancer uniquely experience an added burden from developing an illness that the public recognizes is directly associated with smoking behaviors. Stigmatization and smoking related concerns are of high importance. Oncology nurses must be at the forefront in ensuring that patients with lung cancer do not experience additional burden from perceptions that they somehow deserve and need to defend why they have the illness that they are facing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejon.2014.02.003

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Through trajectory risk, survivors experience loss of productive functions, financial crises, family tensions and stigma.

    “Through trajectory risk, survivors experience a loss of productive functions, financial crises, family tensions and stigma [42-44].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lehto, R. H.
Affiliations
Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Lehto, Rebecca H.
Venue
European Journal of Oncology Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-06
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
316-322
ISSN
1462-3889 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046777425
Cited by
54
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3
FWCI
2.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Oncology Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
lung cancer, stigma, smoking, smoking cessation, patient perspectives, illness experience, self-blame, guilt, causal attribution, social attitudes, institutional practices, patient advocacy, oncology nursing, psychological distress, quality of life
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Smoking, Stereotyping, Focus Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review