Cited by 258Cancer survivorship and careLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

A systematic review of the impact of stigma and nihilism on lung cancer outcomes

Open access
Chambers, Suzanne K, Dunn, Jeffrey, Occhipinti, Stefano, Hughes, Suzanne, Baade, Peter, Sinclair, Sue, Aitken, Joanne, Youl, Pip +1 more·2012·BMC Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study systematically reviewed the evidence on the influence of stigma and nihilism on lung cancer patterns of care; patients' psychosocial and quality of life (QOL) outcomes; and how this may link to public health programs. METHODS: Medline, EMBASE, ProQuest, CINAHL, PsycINFO databases were searched. Inclusion criteria were: included lung cancer patients and/or partners or caregivers and/or health professionals (either at least 80% of participants had lung cancer or were partners or caregivers of lung cancer patients, or there was a lung cancer specific sub-group focus or analysis), assessed stigma or nihilism with respect to lung cancer and published in English between 1st January 1999 and 31st January 2011. Trial quality and levels of evidence were assessed. RESULTS: Eighteen articles describing 15 studies met inclusion criteria. The seven qualitative studies were high quality with regard to data collection, analysis and reporting; however most lacked a clear theoretical framework; did not address interviewer bias; or provide a rationale for sample size. The eight quantitative studies were generally of low quality with highly selected samples, non-comparable groups and low participation rates and employed divergent theoretical and measurement approaches. Stigma about lung cancer was reported by patients and health professionals and was related to poorer QOL and higher psychological distress in patients. Clear empirical explorations of nihilism were not evident. There is qualitative evidence that from the patients' perspectives public health programs contribute to stigma about lung cancer and this was supported by published commentary. CONCLUSIONS: Health-related stigma presents as a part of the lung cancer experience however there are clear limitations in the research to date. Future longitudinal and multi-level research is needed and this should be more clearly linked to relevant theory.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2407-12-184

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Stigma among members of stigmatized groups is linked with psychological distress, reduced self-esteem, poor quality of life, reduction of social support networks, and delays in seeking care from healthcare professionals.

    “It has been linked with psychological distress, reduced self-esteem, poor quality of life, a reduction of social support networks, and delays in seeking care from healthcare professionals [29–32].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Cigarette smoking among adults and trends in smoking cessation - United States 2008 http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5844a2.htm 19910909

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chambers, S. K., Dunn, J., Occhipinti, S., Hughes, S., Baade, P., Sinclair, S., Aitken, J., Youl, P., & O’Connell, D. L.
Affiliations
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • Cancer Council NSW (AU)
  • Cancer Australia (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Chambers, Suzanne K
Venue
BMC Cancer
Published
2012-05-20
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
184-184
ISSN
1471-2407 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2033220257
Cited by
258
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • The Sydney eScholarship Repository (The University of Sydney) (submittedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Cancer Australia
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
lung cancer, stigma, nihilism, quality of life, psychological distress, patterns of care, caregivers, public health programs, health stigma, patient experience
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Lung Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Caregivers, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review