Cited by 86Cancer survivorship and careResilience and Mental HealthWomen's cancer prevention and management

Resilience in women with breast cancer: A systematic review

Open access
Aizpurua-Perez, Ibane, Perez-Tejada, Joana·2020·European Journal of Oncology Nursing

Abstract

Purpose Resilience refers to a dynamic process that promotes a successful adaptation to cancer-related adversity. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the biopsychosocial factors involved in the resilience of women with breast cancer and to integrate evidence on the interventions that can contribute to significantly enhancing it.Method Three databases were searched. In all, 923 articles were identified and, of these, 39 peer-reviewed articles were included.Results Resilience was associated with multiple clinical, sociodemographic, social, psychological and physiological variables, with psychological factors being the most important contributors to the development of resilience. Some protective factors were identified, such as social support, several dimensions of quality of life (QOL) and adaptive coping strategies. Psychological distress was the variable most frequently linked to reductions in resilience, finding a bidirectional relationship between them. Resilience-promoting interventions were found to be effective in improving participants' psychological well-being.Conclusion Resilience is a relevant factor related with several sociodemographic, clinical, psychosocial and physiological variables in women with breast cancer. However, limitations such as the wide variability of instruments used together with the heterogeneity and small size of the samples restrict the generalizability of our conclusions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejon.2020.101854

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 85 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aizpurua-Perez, I., & Perez-Tejada, J.
Venue
European Journal of Oncology Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
49
Pages
101854
ISSN
1462-3889 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3091978907
Cited by
86
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 4
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Oncology Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Communities in ADDI (University of the Basque Country) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Hispana (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Eusko Jaurlaritza
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
Keywords
resilience, breast cancer, women, biopsychosocial factors, social support, quality of life, coping strategies, psychological distress, psychological well-being
MeSH terms
Cancer Survivors, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Patients, Quality of Life, Social Support, Resilience, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review