Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 241

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Control and system-theoretic identification of the supply chain dynamics domain for planning, analysis and adaptation of performance under uncertainty

Ivanov, Dmitry, Sokolov, Boris·2013·European Journal of Operational Research
DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.08.021
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.08.021

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 83

  1. Acar, 2010, A decision support framework for global supply chain modelling: an assessment of the impact of demand, supply and lead-time uncertainties on performance, International Journal of Production Research, 48, 3245, 10.1080/00207540902791769 · doi:10.1080/00207540902791769
  2. Archipov, 2011, An entropy-based approach to simultaneous analysis of supply chain structural complexity and adaptation potential, International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 3, 180, 10.1504/IJSTL.2011.039378 · doi:10.1504/ijstl.2011.039378
  3. Arreola-Risa, 2011, Optimizing stochastic production inventory systems: a heuristic based on simulation and regression analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, 213, 107, 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.02.031 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2011.02.031
  4. Barlas, 2011, Demand forecasting and sharing strategies to reduce fluctuations and the bullwhip effect in supply chains, Journal of Operational Research Society, 62, 458, 10.1057/jors.2010.188 · doi:10.1057/jors.2010.188
  5. Beamon, 1999, Measuring supply chain performance, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 19, 275, 10.1108/01443579910249714 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bensoussan, 2007, Optimal ordering policies for inventory problems with dynamic information delays, Production & Operations Management, 16, 241, 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2007.tb00178.x · doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2007.tb00178.x
  7. Bertsimas, 2004, Price of robustness, Operations Research, 52, 35, 10.1287/opre.1030.0065 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Braun, 2003, A model predictive control framework for robust management of multi-product, multi-echelon demand networks, Annual Reviews in Control, 27, 229, 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2003.09.006 · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2003.09.006
  9. Cai, 2009, Improving supply chain performance management: a systematic approach to analyzing iterative KPI accomplishment, Decision Support Systems, 46, 512, 10.1016/j.dss.2008.09.004 · DOI
  10. Chen, 2012, Resilience: an indicator of recovery capability in intermodal freight transport, Transportation Science, 46, 109, 10.1287/trsc.1110.0376 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Closs, 2008, Supply chain security: a framework for protecting your supply chain, Logistics Management, 9
  12. Coronado, 2007, Evaluating operations flexibility in industrial supply chains to support build-to-order initiatives, Business Process Management Journal, 13, 572, 10.1108/14637150710763586 · doi:10.1108/14637150710763586
  13. Craighead, 2007, The severity of supply chain disruptions: design characteristics and mitigation capabilities, Decision Sciences, 38, 131, 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2007.00151.x · DOI · Paper page
  14. Daganzo, 2004, On the stability of supply chains, Operations Research, 52, 909, 10.1287/opre.1040.0147 · doi:10.1287/opre.1040.0147
  15. Das, 2011, Integrating effective flexibility measures into a strategic supply chain planning model, European Journal of Operational Research, 211, 170, 10.1016/j.ejor.2010.12.006 · DOI
  16. Datta, 2011, Information sharing and coordination mechanisms for managing uncertainty in supply chains: a simulation study, International Journal of Production Research, 49, 765, 10.1080/00207540903460216 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Dejonckheere, 2004, The impact of information enrichment on the bullwhip effect in supply chains: a control engineering perspective, European Journal of Operational Research, 153, 727, 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00808-1 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Di Giacomo, 2010, Methodological analysis of supply chains management applications, European Journal of Operational Research, 207, 249, 10.1016/j.ejor.2010.05.003 · DOI
  19. Disney, 2002, A discrete linear control theory model to determine the dynamic stability of vendor managed inventory supply chains, International Journal of Production Research, 40, 179, 10.1080/00207540110072975 · doi:10.1080/00207540110072975
  20. Disney, 2006, Taming the bullwhip effect whilst watching customer service in a single echelon of a supply chain, European Journal of Operational Research, 173, 151, 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.01.026 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.01.026
  21. Doerner, 2011, Special issue on optimization in disaster relief, OR Spectrum, 33, 7, 10.1007/s00291-011-0262-3 · doi:10.1007/s00291-011-0262-3
  22. Dolgui, 2007, Supply planning under uncertainties in MRP environments: a state of the art, Annual Reviews in Control, 31, 269, 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2007.02.007 · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2007.02.007
  23. Georgiadis, 2010, The impact of two-product joint lifecycles on capacity planning of remanufacturing networks, European Journal of Operational Research, 202, 420, 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.05.022 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.05.022
  24. Graves, 2008, Strategic inventory placement in supply chains: non-stationary demand, Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 10, 278, 10.1287/msom.1070.0175 · doi:10.1287/msom.1070.0175
  25. Gunasekaran, 2008, Responsive supply chain: a competitive strategy in a networked economy, Omega, 36, 549, 10.1016/j.omega.2006.12.002 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Hendricks, 2005, Association between supply chain glitches and operating performance, Management Science, 51, 695, 10.1287/mnsc.1040.0353 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Hennet, 2008, Supply chain coordination: a game-theory approach, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 21, 399, 10.1016/j.engappai.2007.10.003 · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2007.10.003
  28. Hoberg, 2007, Analyzing the effect of the inventory policy on order and inventory variability with linear control theory, European Journal of Operational Research, 176, 1620, 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.10.040 · DOI
  29. Hwarng, 2008, Understanding supply chain dynamics: a chaos perspective, European Journal of Operational Research, 184, 1163, 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.12.014 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.12.014
  30. Ivanov, 2012, Dynamic supply chain scheduling, Journal of Scheduling, 15, 201, 10.1007/s10951-010-0189-6 · doi:10.1007/s10951-010-0189-6
  31. Ivanov, 2010, A multi-structural framework for adaptive supply chain planning and operations with structure dynamics considerations, European Journal of Operational Research, 200, 409, 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.002 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Ivanov, 2012, Applicability of optimal control theory to adaptive supply chain planning and scheduling, Annual Reviews in Control, 36, 73, 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2012.03.006 · DOI
  33. Jang, 2006, A flexible and adaptive control architecture for the efficient supply chain management (SCM), WSEAS Transactions on Communications, 5, 1015
  34. Jüttner, 2011, Supply chain resilience in the global financial crisis: an empirical study, Supply Chain Management, 16, 246, 10.1108/13598541111139062 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Kamath, 2007, Capacity augmentation of a supply chain for a short lifecycle product: a system dynamics framework, European Journal of Operational Research, 179, 334, 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.03.045 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.03.045
  36. Kauder, 2009, Strategic network planning for an international automotive manufacturer, OR Spectrum, 3, 507, 10.1007/s00291-009-0171-x · doi:10.1007/s00291-009-0171-x
  37. Kleindorfer, 2005, Managing disruption risks in supply chains, Production and Operations Management, 14, 53, 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00009.x · DOI · Paper page
  38. Klibi, 2010, The design of robust value-creating supply chain networks: a critical review, European Journal of Operational Research, 203, 283, 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.06.011 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Knoppen, 2007, Interorganizational adaptation in supply chains: a behavioral perspective, International Journal of Logistics Management, 18, 217, 10.1108/09574090710816940 · DOI
  40. Krajewski, 2005, Responding to schedule changes in build-to-order supply chains, Journal of Operations Management, 23, 452, 10.1016/j.jom.2004.10.006 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Lee, 2004, The triple: a supply chain, Harvard Business Review, 82, 102
  42. Lee, 2011, Supply chain efficiency and security: coordination for collaborative investment in technology, European Journal of Operational Research, 210, 568, 10.1016/j.ejor.2010.10.015 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Lodree, 2008, An insurance risk management framework for disaster relief and supply chain disruption inventory planning, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59, 674, 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602377 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Meepetchdee, 2007, Logistical network design with robustness and complexity considerations, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 37, 201
  45. Mirzapour Al-E-Hashem, 2011, A multi-objective robust optimization model for multi-product multi-site aggregate production planning in a supply chain under uncertainty, International Journal of Production Economics, 134, 28, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.01.027 · DOI
  46. Mula, 2010, Mathematical programming models for supply chain production and transport planning, European Journal of Operational Research, 204, 377, 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.09.008 · DOI
  47. Mulani, 2002, New business models for supply chain excellence, vol. 4
  48. Naim, 2006, The role of transport flexibility in logistics provision, International Journal of Logistics Management, 17, 297, 10.1108/09574090610717491 · doi:10.1108/09574090610717491
  49. Olhager, 2003, Strategic positioning of the order penetration point, International Journal of Production Economics, 319, 10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00119-1 · DOI
  50. Ouyang, 2007, The effect of information sharing on supply chain stability and the bullwhip effect, European Journal of Operational Research, 182, 1107, 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.09.037 · DOI
  51. Ouyang, 2010, The bullwhip effect in supply chain networks, European Journal of Operational Research, 201, 799, 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.03.051 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.03.051
  52. Ozbayrak, 2006, Flexible and adaptable planning and control system for an MTO supply chain system, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 22, 557, 10.1016/j.rcim.2005.12.011 · doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2005.12.011
  53. Peng, 2011, Reliable logistics networks design with facility disruptions, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 45, 1190, 10.1016/j.trb.2011.05.022 · DOI
  54. Perea, 2000, Dynamic modeling and classical control theory for supply chain management, Computers and Chemical Engineering, 24, 1143, 10.1016/S0098-1354(00)00495-6 · doi:10.1016/s0098-1354(00)00495-6
  55. Ponomarov, 2009, Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience, International Journal of Logistic Management, 20, 124, 10.1108/09574090910954873 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Puigjaner, 2008, Capturing dynamics in integrated supply chain management, Computers and Chemical Engineering, 32, :2582, 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2007.10.003 · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2007.10.003
  57. Rosenhead, 1972, Robustness and optimality as criteria for strategic decisions, Operational Research Quarterly, 23, 413, 10.1057/jors.1972.72 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Samsatli, 1998, Robustness metrics for dynamic optimization models under parameter uncertainty, AIChE Journal, 44, 1993, 10.1002/aic.690440907 · doi:10.1002/aic.690440907
  59. Samsatli, 2001, Operational envelopes for batch processes, AIChE Journal, 47, 2277, 10.1002/aic.690471013 · DOI
  60. Santoso, 2005, A stochastic programming approach for supply chain network design under uncertainty, European Journal of Operational Research, 167, 96, 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.01.046 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Sarimveis, 2008, Dynamic modeling and control of supply chain systems: a review, Computers & Operations Research, 35, 3530, 10.1016/j.cor.2007.01.017 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Schmitt, A.J., 2011. Strategies for Customer Service Level Protection Under Multi-Echelon Supply Chain Disruption Risk. (Working paper.) Center for Transportation and Logistics, MIT, Cambridge, MA. SSRN:http://ssrn.com/abstract=1433512. · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1433512
  63. Seifert, 2011, Managing business dynamics with adaptive supply chain portfolios, European Journal of Operational Research, 215, 551, 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.06.026 · DOI
  64. Shepherd, 2006, Measuring supply chain performance: current research and future directions, International Journal of Productivity & Performance Management, 55, 242, 10.1108/17410400610653219 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Sipahi, 2010, Stability of inventory dynamics in supply chains with three delays, International Journal of Production Economics, 123, 107, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.07.013 · DOI
  66. Son, 2007, Hierarchical supply chain planning architecture for integrated analysis of stability and performance, International Journal of Simulation and Process Modelling, 3, 153, 10.1504/IJSPM.2007.015239 · doi:10.1504/ijspm.2007.015239
  67. Springer, 2010, Managing the order pipeline to reduce supply chain volatility, European Journal of Operational Research, 203, 380, 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.08.009 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.08.009
  68. Stevenson, 2007, Flexibility from a supply chain perspective: definition and review, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27, 685, 10.1108/01443570710756956 · DOI · Paper page
  69. Swafford, 2008, Achieving supply chain agility through IT integration and flexibility, International Journal of Production Economics, 116, 288, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.09.002 · DOI · Paper page
  70. Tachizawa, 2007, Drivers and sources of supply flexibility: an exploratory study, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27, 1115, 10.1108/01443570710820657 · DOI
  71. Tang, 2008, The power of flexibility for mitigating supply chain risks, International Journal of Production Economics, 116, 12, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.07.008 · DOI · Paper page
  72. Tanrisever, 2012, Managing capacity flexibility in make-to-order production environments, European Journal of Operational Research, 216, 334, 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.07.043 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2011.07.043
  73. Taylor, 2008, Determining inventory service support levels in multi-national companies, International Journal of Production Economics, 116, 1, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.05.020 · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.05.020
  74. Tsiakis, 2001, Design of multi-echelon supply chain networks under demand uncertainty, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 40, 3585, 10.1021/ie0100030 · doi:10.1021/ie0100030
  75. Vahdani, 2011, A hybrid multi-stage predictive model for supply chain network collapse recovery analysis: a practical framework for effective supply chain network continuity management, International Journal of Production Research, 49, 2035, 10.1080/00207540903289748 · DOI
  76. Vieira, 2000, Predicting the performance of rescheduling strategies for parallel machine systems, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 19, 256, 10.1016/S0278-6125(01)80005-4 · doi:10.1016/s0278-6125(01)80005-4
  77. Villegas, 2006, Supply chain dynamics: analysis of inventory vs. order oscillations trade off, International Journal of Production Research, 44, 1037, 10.1080/00207540500338203 · doi:10.1080/00207540500338203
  78. Wadhwa, 2008, Framework for flexibility in dynamic supply chain management, International Journal of Production Research, 46, 1373, 10.1080/00207540600570432 · DOI
  79. Wang, 2009, Robust optimization model and algorithm for logistics center location and allocation under uncertain environment, Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering & IT, 9, 69, 10.1016/S1570-6672(08)60056-2 · doi:10.1016/s1570-6672(08)60056-2
  80. Wang, 2007, Model predictive control strategies for supply chain management in semiconductor industry, International Journal of Production Economics, 107, 56, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.05.013 · DOI
  81. Williams, 2008, Supply chain security: an overview and research agenda, International Journal of Logistics Management, 19, 254, 10.1108/09574090810895988 · DOI · Paper page
  82. Yadav, 2011, A framework for designing robust supply chains considering product development issues, International Journal of Production Research, 49, 6065, 10.1080/00207543.2010.524258 · doi:10.1080/00207543.2010.524258
  83. Zhang, 2011, Collaborative production planning of supply chain under price and demand uncertainty, European Journal of Operational Research, 215, 590, 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.07.007 · DOI

Cited by

See all 241

Metadata

Authors
Ivanov, D., & Sokolov, B.
Venue
European Journal of Operational Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-01
Volume
224
Issue
2
Pages
313-323
ISSN
0377-2217 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.ejor.2012.08.021
OpenAlex
W2066699719
Cited by
241
References
2
FWCI
21.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Control and system-theoretic identification of the supply chain dynamics domain for planning, analysis and adaptation of performance under uncertainty. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.08.021
The paper
Ivanov, D., & Sokolov, B. (2013). Control and system-theoretic identification of the supply chain dynamics domain for planning, analysis and adaptation of performance under uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.08.021

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.