The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep learning with long short-term memory networks for financial market predictions
Open accessAbstract
Long short-term memory (LSTM) networks are a state-of-the-art technique for sequence learning. They are less commonly applied to financial time series predictions, yet inherently suitable for this domain. We deploy LSTM networks for predicting out-of-sample directional movements for the constituent stocks of the S&P 500 from 1992 until 2015. With daily returns of 0.46 percent and a Sharpe ratio of 5.8 prior to transaction costs, we find LSTM networks to outperform memory-free classification methods, i.e., a random forest (RAF), a deep neural net (DNN), and a logistic regression classifier (LOG). The outperformance relative to the general market is very clear from 1992 to 2009, but as of 2010, excess returns seem to have been arbitraged away with LSTM profitability fluctuating around zero after transaction costs. We further unveil sources of profitability, thereby shedding light into the black box of artificial neural networks. Specifically, we find one common pattern among the stocks selected for trading – they exhibit high volatility and a short-term reversal return profile. Leveraging these findings, we are able to formalize a rules-based short-term reversal strategy that yields 0.23 percent prior to transaction costs. Further regression analysis unveils low exposure of the LSTM returns to common sources of systematic risk – also compared to the three benchmark models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance
Carhart, M. M. (1997) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03808.x · Cited by 17,283
Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work
Fama, E. F. (1970) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.2307/2325486 · Cited by 13,635
Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency
JEGADEESH, N., & TITMAN, S. (1993) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04702.x · Cited by 11,584
TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systems
Abadi, M., Agarwal, A., Barham, P., Brevdo, E., Chen, Z., Citro, C., Corrado, G. S., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M., et al. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1603.04467 · Cited by 9,408
Speech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks
Graves, A., Mohamed, A.-R., & Hinton, G. (2013) · 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.2013.6638947 · Cited by 8,893
Deep neural networks, gradient-boosted trees, random forests: Statistical arbitrage on the S&P 500
Krauss, C., Do, X. A., & Huck, N. (2017) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2016.10.031 · Cited by 750
The supraview of return predictive signals
Green, J., Hand, J. R. M., & Zhang, X. F. (2013) · Review of Accounting Studies · doi:10.1007/s11142-013-9231-1 · Cited by 219
Cited by
A Comparison of ARIMA and LSTM in Forecasting Time Series
Siami-Namini, S., Tavakoli, N., & Siami Namin, A. (2018) · 2018 17th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA) · doi:10.1109/icmla.2018.00227 · Cited by 1,387
A Survey of Deep Learning: Platforms, Applications and Emerging Research Trends
Hatcher, W. G., & Yu, W. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2830661 · Cited by 654
Kraus, M., Feuerriegel, S., & Oztekin, A. (2020) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2019.09.018 · Cited by 392
Short-term stock market price trend prediction using a comprehensive deep learning system
Shen, J., & Shafiq, M. O. (2020) · Journal of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-020-00333-6 · Cited by 380
Deep Reinforcement Learning for Trading
Zhang, Z., Zohren, S., & Roberts, S. (2020) · The Journal of Financial Data Science · doi:10.3905/jfds.2020.1.030 · Cited by 227
Metadata
- Authors
- Fischer, T., & Krauss, C.
- Venue
- European Journal of Operational Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 270
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 654-669
- ISSN
- 0377-2217 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2624385633
- Cited by
- 2,785
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 111.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep learning with long short-term memory networks for financial market predictions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.11.054
- The paper
- Fischer, T., & Krauss, C. (2018). Deep learning with long short-term memory networks for financial market predictions. European Journal of Operational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.11.054
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.