The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reliability and validity of a modified Brief Pain Inventory short form in patients with osteoarthritis
Abstract
The Brief Pain Inventory short form (BPI‐sf) is a validated, widely used, self‐administered questionnaire developed to assess the severity of pain and the impact of pain on daily functions. A modified version was used daily in randomised control trials of patients with arthritis undergoing treatment with cyclooxygenase‐2 specific inhibitors and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs. Results indicate that the modified BPI‐sf, much like the original scale, was internally reliable, consistent over time, and had good construct, as well as convergent and predictive validity in assessment of patients suffering from conditions of chronic pain. Each scale and individual pain intensity item refers to changes in osteoarthritis pain associated with medication use. The modified BPI‐sf, like the parent scale, is a valid and reliable tool for situations in which pain is assessed daily and minimises the burden placed on patients to record information necessary for scientific investigations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The BPI has demonstrated good construct validity, adequate internal consistency,49 Cronbach’s alpha, α=0.88 and acceptable test-retest reliability.50”
From Investigating the effectiveness of an online acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) intervention versus a waiting list control condition on pain interference and quality of life in adults with chronic pain and multimorbidity: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial (2019) · cites this paper as [50]
In the citing paper
“Excellent test–retest reliability of the BPI has also been demonstrated among people with chronic pain due to osteoarthritis.38 Correlation coefficients ranging from r=0.83–0.88 and from r=0.83–0.93 were reported for the pain intensity and for the pain interference scales, respectively.38”
In the citing paper
“Excellent test-retest reliability has been reported in a chronic pain cohort [39]”
Citations
Cites
Construct validity in psychological tests.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0040957 · Cited by 11,195
Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations
Turk, D. C., Dworkin, R. H., Allen, R. R., Bellamy, N., Brandenburg, N., Carr, D. B., Cleeland, C., Dionne, R., Farrar, J. T., Galer, B. S., et al. (2003) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2003.08.001 · Cited by 3,510
Self-citationPain and Its Treatment in Outpatients with Metastatic Cancer
Cleeland, C. S., Gonin, R., Hatfield, A. K., Edmonson, J. H., Blum, R. H., Stewart, J. A., & Pandya, K. J. (1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199403033300902 · Cited by 2,019
Self-citationEnzyme Replacement Therapy in Fabry Disease
Schiffmann, R., Kopp, J. B., Austin, H. A., Sabnis, S. G., Moore, D. F., Weibel, T., Balow, J. E., & Brady, R. O. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.285.21.2743 · Cited by 1,298
Keller, S., Bann, C. M., Dodd, S. L., Schein, J., Mendoza, T. R., & Cleeland, C. S. (2004) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/00002508-200409000-00005 · Cited by 1,233
Self-citationQuality Improvement Guidelines for the Treatment of Acute Pain and Cancer Pain
Max, M. B. (1995) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03530230060032 · Cited by 806
Psychological approaches to pain management: A practitioner's handbook
Williams, A. C. D. C. (1997) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(96)00324-8 · Cited by 755
Painful diabetic polyneuropathy: epidemiology, pain description, and quality of life
Galer, B. S., Gianas, A., & Jensen, M. P. (2000) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/s0168-8227(99)00112-6 · Cited by 601
Biopsychosocial perspective on chronic pain.
Turk, D. C., & Monarch, E. S. (1996) · Cited by 439
Pain Measurement Tools and Methods in Clinical Research in Palliative Care
Caraceni, A. T., Cherny, N. I., Fainsinger, R. L., Kaasa, S., Poulain, P., Radbruch, L., & Conno, F. D. (2002) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/s0885-3924(01)00409-2 · Cited by 426
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dworkin, R. H., Turk, D. C., Wyrwich, K. W., Beaton, D., Cleeland, C. S., Farrar, J. T., Haythornthwaite, J. A., Jensen, M. P., Kerns, R. D., Ader, D. N., et al. (2008) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2007.09.005 · Cited by 3,471
Self-citationKrebs, E. E., Lorenz, K. A., Bair, M. J., Damush, T. M., Wu, J., Sutherland, J. M., Asch, S. M., & Kroenke, K. (2009) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-009-0981-1 · Cited by 782
The Brief Pain Inventory User Guide
Cleeland, C. S. (2009) · Cited by 464
Self-citationFish, R. A., McGuire, B., Hogan, M., Morrison, T. G., & Stewart, I. (2010) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2009.12.016 · Cited by 306
“Some studies have found that the BPI interference subscale represents two factors referring to: (1) pain interference of activity (three items: walking ability, general activity and normal work) and (2) pain interference of mood (two items: mood and relations with others) [35].”
BackgroundPain Assessment Strategies in Older Patients
Herr, K. (2011) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2010.11.011 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Mendoza, T., Mayne, T., Rublee, D., & Cleeland, C.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
- Pfizer (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mendoza, Tito
- Venue
- European Journal of Pain
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-05
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 353-353
- ISSN
- 1090-3801 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2149
- OpenAlex
- W2152763689
- Cited by
- 444
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 3.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Pfizer Pharmaceuticals
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Keywords
- Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form, osteoarthritis, pain assessment, questionnaire reliability, construct validity, convergent validity, predictive validity, COX-2 inhibitors, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, chronic pain
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal, Chronic Disease, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Osteoarthritis, Pain, Pain Measurement, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Treatment Outcome, Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
