The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chronic itch and pain—Similarities and differences
Abstract
Both, pruritus and pain are aversive, but clearly distinct sensations originating in the peripheral and central nervous system. During the last years, many interactions between itch and pain in acute transmission and sensitization processes have been identified. It is common experience that the itch sensation can be reduced by the painful sensations caused by scratching. Vice versa analgesia may reduce this inhibition and thus enhance itch. This phenomenon is particularly relevant to spinally administered μ‐opioid receptor agonists, which induce segmental analgesia often combined with segmental pruritus. The peripheral and central sensitization to pain and to itch exhibits striking similarities. Classical inflammatory mediators such as bradykinin have been shown to sensitize nociceptors for both itch and pain. Also regulation of gene expression induced by trophic factors, such as NGF, plays a major role in persistently increased neuronal sensitivity for itch and pain. Finally, itch and pain exhibit corresponding patterns of central sensitization. The knowledge of antagonistic interaction, but also of similar sensitization processes has major implication for antipruritic therapeutic approaches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
How do you feel? Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body
Craig, A. D. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn894 · Cited by 6,006
Pain and emotion interactions in subregions of the cingulate gyrus
Vogt, B. A. (2005) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1704 · Cited by 1,810
Urge to scratch represented in the human cerebral cortex during itch
Hsieh, J. C., Hagermark, O., Stahle-Backdahl, M., Ericson, K., Eriksson, L., Stone-Elander, S., & Ingvar, M. (1994) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1994.72.6.3004 · Cited by 237 · cited 1×
“In PET studies induction of itch by histamine application co-activated the anterior cingulate and insular cortex, premotor and supplementary motor area, cerebellum, primary somatosensory cortex and thalamus (Hsieh et al., 1994; Drzezga et al., 2001; Mochizuki et al., 2003).”
BackgroundPain as a complication of use of opiate antagonists for symptom control in cholestasis
Mcrae, C. A., Prince, M. I., Hudson, M., Day, C. P., James, O. F. W., & Jones, D. E. J. (2003) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/s0016-5085(03)00879-5 · Cited by 73
Cited by
A gastrin-releasing peptide receptor mediates the itch sensation in the spinal cord
Sun, Y.-G., & Chen, Z.-F. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06029 · Cited by 788
Lysophosphatidic Acid Is a Potential Mediator of Cholestatic Pruritus
Kremer, A. E., Martens, J. J. W. W., Kulik, W., Ruëff, F., Kuiper, E. M. M., van Buuren, H. R., van Erpecum, K. J., Kondrackiene, J., Prieto, J., Rust, C., et al. (2010) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2010.05.009 · Cited by 410
Akiyama, T., & Carstens, E. (2013) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.07.035 · Cited by 272
Role of attentional focus on bodily sensations in sensitivity to itch and pain
van Laarhoven, A., Kraaimaat, F., Wilder-Smith, O., & Evers, A. (2010) · Acta Dermato Venereologica · doi:10.2340/00015555-0743 · Cited by 53
Role of personality and expectations for itch and scratching induced by audiovisual itch stimuli
Schut, C., Rädel, A., Frey, L., Gieler, U., & Kupfer, J. (2016) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1002/ejp.751 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Ständer, S., & Schmelz, M.
- Venue
- European Journal of Pain
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 473-473
- ISSN
- 1090-3801 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2149
- OpenAlex
- W2059768248
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.