Cited by 119Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchMyofascial pain diagnosis and treatmentMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Chronic widespread musculoskeletal pain – A comparison of those who meet criteria for fibromyalgia and those who do not

Cöster, Lars, Kendall, Sally, Gerdle, Björn, Henriksson, Chris, Henriksson, Karl G., Bengtsson, Ann·2008·European Journal of Pain

Abstract

Fibromyalgia is currently classified as chronic widespread pain with widespread allodynia to pressure pain. There are few data describing pain characteristics, quality of life, consequences for daily living, and psychosocial status in patients who meet the classification criteria for fibromyalgia proposed by the American College of Rheumatology compared with patients with chronic widespread pain but not widespread allodynia. This study used a randomly selected sample from the general population. A postal questionnaire and a pain mannequin were sent to 9952 people. The response rate was 76.7%. The pain drawings showed that 345 people had widespread pain; that is, they noted pain in all four extremities and axially. Clinical examination, which included a manual tender point examination, was performed in 125 subjects. These people answered commonly used questionnaires on pain, quality of life, coping strategies, depression, and anxiety. Compared with chronic widespread pain without widespread allodynia, fibromyalgia was associated with more severe symptoms/consequences for daily life and higher pain severity. Similar coping strategies were found. Chronic widespread pain without widespread allodynia to pressure pain was found in 4.5% in the population and fibromyalgia in 2.5%.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejpain.2007.10.001

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cöster, L., Kendall, S., Gerdle, B., Henriksson, C., Henriksson, K. G., & Bengtsson, A.
Affiliations
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Gerdle, Björn
Venue
European Journal of Pain
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-07
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
600-610
ISSN
  • 1090-3801 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2149
OpenAlex
W2078333129
Cited by
119
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
6.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Reumatikerförbundet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
fibromyalgia, chronic widespread pain, pressure pain, pain drawings, pain intensity, quality of life, coping strategies, depression, anxiety, tender points, prevalence
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Chronic Disease, Depression, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Fibromyalgia, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Myofascial Pain Syndromes, Pain, Pressure, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sampling Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Sweden, Creatine Kinase, MM Form

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review