Cited by 61Silk-based biomaterials and applicationsBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

Biocompatibility and osteoconduction of macroporous silk fibroin implants in cortical defects in sheep

Open access
Uebersax, Lorenz, Apfel, Tanja, Nuss, Katja M.R., Vogt, Rainer, Kim, Hyoen Yoo, Meinel, Lorenz, Kaplan, David L., Auer, Joerg A. +2 more·2013·European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics

Abstract

The goal of the presented study was to compare the biocompatibility and cellular responses to porous silk fibroin (SF) scaffolds produced in a water-based (UPW) or a solvent based process (HFIP) using two different SF sources. For that reason, four different SF scaffolds were implanted (n=6) into drill hole defects in the cancellous bone of the sheep tibia and humerus. The scaffolds were evaluated histologically for biocompatibility, cell-material interaction, and cellular ingrowth. New bone formation was observed macroscopically and histologically at 8 weeks after implantation. For semiquantitative evaluation, the investigated parameters were scored and statistically analyzed (factorial ANOVA). All implants showed good biocompatibility as evident by low infiltration of inflammatory cells and the absent encapsulation of the scaffolds in connective tissue. Multinuclear foreign body giant cells (MFGCs) and macrophages were present in all parts of the scaffold at the material surface and actively degrading the SF material. Cell ingrowth and vascularization were uniform across the scaffold. However, in HFIP scaffolds, local regions of void pores were present throughout the scaffold, probably due to the low pore interconnectivity in this scaffold type in contrast to UPW scaffolds. The amount of newly formed bone was very low in both scaffold types but was more abundant in the periphery than in the center of the scaffolds and for HFIP scaffolds mainly restricted to single pores.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejpb.2013.05.008

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Silk fibroin sponge-like porous scaffolds are prepared through methods such as freeze-drying, salt leaching, and chemical crosslinking.

    “Silk fibroin sponge-like porous scaffolds are prepared through methods such as freeze-drying, salt leaching, and chemical crosslinking [38,62,63].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Uebersax, L., Apfel, T., Nuss, K. M. R., Vogt, R., Kim, H. Y., Meinel, L., Kaplan, D. L., Auer, J. A., Merkle, H. P., & von Rechenberg, B.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Tufts University (US)
Venue
European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-09
Volume
85
Issue
1
Pages
107-118
ISSN
0939-6411 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007901852
Cited by
61
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Silk-based biomaterials and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
Keywords
silk fibroin, macroporous scaffolds, biocompatibility, osteoconduction, bone tissue engineering, cortical bone defect, foreign body giant cells, macrophages, cell infiltration, vascularization, pore connectivity, solvent casting, water-based processing, sheep tibia
MeSH terms
Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Bone Regeneration, Cell Adhesion, Fibroins, Foreign-Body Reaction, Humerus, Macrophages, Male, Materials Testing, Osteocytes, Tibia, Giant Cells, Foreign-Body, Porosity, Animals, Inbred Strains, Neovascularization, Physiologic, Sheep, Domestic, Guided Tissue Regeneration, Cell Proliferation, Tissue Scaffolds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review