Cited by 21Survey Methodology and NonresponseSurvey Sampling and Estimation TechniquesElectoral Systems and Political Participation

A measure of survey mode differences

Homola, Jonathan, Jackson, Natalie, Gill, Jeff·2016·Electoral Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.electstud.2016.06.010

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This reflects social desirability biases where respondents provide more moderate answers in the presence of interviewers since extremity is normatively undesirable.

    “This reflects social desirability biases where respondents provide more moderate answers in the presence of interviewers since extremity is normatively undesirable (e.g., Atkeson et al., 2014;Endres et al., 2023;Homola et al., 2016).”

    From Measuring affective polarization: Matching concepts to measures (2026) · cites this paper as Homola et al., 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 61 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Homola, J., Jackson, N., & Gill, J.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Gill, Jeff
Venue
Electoral Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-12
Volume
44
Pages
255-274
ISSN
0261-3794 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2472965291
Cited by
21
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Electoral Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Keywords
survey mode effects, online surveys, face-to-face surveys, response variability, personal contact, 2012 presidential election

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review