The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Business models for open innovation: Matching heterogeneous open innovation strategies with business model dimensions
Open accessAbstract
Research on open innovation suggests that companies benefit differentially from adopting open innovation strategies; however, it is unclear why this is so. One possible explanation is that companies’ business models are not attuned to open strategies. Accordingly, we propose a contingency model of open business models by systematically linking open innovation strategies to core business model dimensions, notably the content, structure, governance of transactions. We further illustrate a continuum of open innovativeness, differentiating between four types of open business models. We contribute to the open innovation literature by specifying the conditions under which business models are conducive to the success of open innovation strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.507 · Cited by 6,324
The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits
Hansen, M. T. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667032 · Cited by 5,809
The business model: Recent developments and future research
Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206311406265 · Cited by 4,790
Co‐creating unique value with customers
Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004) · Strategy & Leadership · doi:10.1108/10878570410699249 · Cited by 2,463 · cited 1×
“Open innovation has been widely debated in the management of innovation literature over the past decade (e.g., Chesbrough, 2003; Dahlander & Gann, 2010; Gassmann & Enkel, 2004; von Hippel, 2005; Prahalad & Ramaswary, 2004; West & Gallagher, 2006).”
BackgroundOrganization design: an information processing view
Galbraith, J. R. (1974) · Interfaces · doi:10.1287/inte.4.3.28 · Cited by 2,451
The fit between product market strategy and business model: implications for firm performance
Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2008) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.642 · Cited by 1,731
Innovation objectives, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth
Leiponen, A., & Helfat, C. E. (2010) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.807 · Cited by 1,341
Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open-source software
West, J., & Gallagher, S. (2006) · R and D Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00436.x · Cited by 1,136 · cited 1×
“Open innovation has been widely debated in the management of innovation literature over the past decade (e.g., Chesbrough, 2003; Dahlander & Gann, 2010; Gassmann & Enkel, 2004; von Hippel, 2005; Prahalad & Ramaswary, 2004; West & Gallagher, 2006).”
Cited by
Müller, J. M., Buliga, O., & Voigt, K.-I. (2021) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2020.01.002 · Cited by 523
Sjödin, D., Parida, V., Jovanovic, M., & Visnjic, I. (2020) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12516 · Cited by 513
Metadata
- Authors
- Saebi, T., & Foss, N. J.
- Venue
- European Management Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 201-213
- ISSN
- 0263-2373 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3125706980
- Cited by
- 503
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 78.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Business models for open innovation: Matching heterogeneous open innovation strategies with business model dimensions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.emj.2014.11.002
- The paper
- Saebi, T., & Foss, N. J. (2015). Business models for open innovation: Matching heterogeneous open innovation strategies with business model dimensions. European Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2014.11.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
