Field experiment of smartphone-based energy efficiency services for households: Impact of advice through push notifications
Abstract
Abstract This study aims to reveal the effectiveness of energy efficiency advice in the residential sector by using the push notification function of a smartphone app. The app was provided to approximately 1,700 households, who were recruited by an opt-in method, in the Kanto region where the temperate climate in eastern Japan. We conducted randomized controlled trials to evaluate the impact of push notifications with energy efficiency advice. The proposed energy efficiency advice used the data of electricity consumption and attributes as well as behavioral science’s “nudge” approach. The results indicate that the energy efficiency advice reduced electricity consumption by 1.3%, which is statistically significant. Furthermore, the implementation rates had increased for some of the energy-efficiency behaviors that were mentioned in the advice. Additionally, the opening ratios of the push notifications were improved 1.2 and 1.3 times using personalized sentences and adjusting the timing of the push notifications, respectively. These results indicated that personalization of the push notifications could increase the number of users who check the advice. An increase in the energy efficiency rate was observed among households who checked the advice on the standby screen of the smartphone and the dialog and notification list screen in the app. Although this study used relatively simple logic to deliver personalized energy efficiency advice, the results suggest that utilizing smartphones and various data, as well as making communication more interactive between the users and service providers, could effectively induce energy-efficient behavior.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-0977 · Cited by 11,614 · see citing works
Social norms and energy conservation
Allcott, H. (2011) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.03.003 · Cited by 2,715 · see citing works
Normative social influence is underdetected
Nolan, J. M., Schultz, P. W., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2008) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167208316691 · Cited by 1,772 · see citing works
Allcott, H., & Rogers, T. (2014) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.104.10.3003 · Cited by 1,340 · see citing works
Improved Docking of Polypeptides with Glide
Tubert-Brohman, I., Sherman, W., Repasky, M., & Beuming, T. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci400128m · Cited by 1,308 · see citing works
Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Rothengatter, T. (2007) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.08.002 · Cited by 880 · see citing works
Hargreaves, T., Nye, M., & Burgess, J. A. (2010) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.068 · Cited by 808 · see citing works
Political ideology affects energy-efficiency attitudes and choices
Gromet, D. M., Kunreuther, H., & Larrick, R. P. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · doi:10.1073/pnas.1218453110 · Cited by 431 · see citing works
Shareef, H., Ahmed, M. S., Mohamed, A., & Hassan, E. A. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2831917 · Cited by 385 · see citing works
Benders, R. M. J., Kok, R., Moll, H. C., Wiersma, G., & Noorman, K. J. (2005) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2005.08.005 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Nilsson, A., Wester, M., Lazarevic, D., & Brandt, N. (2018) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.08.026 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Categories and functionality of smart home technology for energy management
Ford, R., Pritoni, M., Sanguinetti, A., & Karlin, B. (2017) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.07.020 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Visualizing energy consumption activities as a tool for making everyday life more sustainable
Ellegård, K., & Palm, J. (2010) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.11.019 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Do The Effects of Nudges Persist? Theory and Evidence from 38 Natural Field Experiments
Brandon, A., Ferraro, P. J., List, J. A., Metcalfe, R., Price, M., & Rundhammer, F. (2017) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w23277 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Jain, R. K., Taylor, J. E., & Culligan, P. J. (2013) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.05.011 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Effects of continuous feedback on households’ electricity consumption: Potentials and barriers
Nilsson, A., Bergstad, C. J., Thuvander, L., Andersson, D., Andersson, K., & Meiling, P. (2014) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.01.060 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
The impact of consumers’ feedback preferences on domestic electricity consumption
Vassileva, I., Odlare, M., Wallin, F., & Dahlquist, E. (2012) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.12.067 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Home energy consumption feedback: A user survey
Bonino, D., Corno, F., & Russis, L. D. (2011) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.12.017 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Sanguinetti, A., Dombrovski, K., & Sikand, S. (2017) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.001 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
The use of apps to promote energy saving: a study of smart meter–related feedback in the Netherlands
Geelen, D., Mugge, R., Silvester, S., & Bulters, A. (2019) · Energy Efficiency · doi:10.1007/s12053-019-09777-z · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Khosrowpour, A., Jain, R. K., Taylor, J. E., Peschiera, G., Chen, J., & Gulbinas, R. (2018) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.148 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Creating an in-home display: Experimental evidence and guidelines for design
Krishnamurti, T., Davis, A. L., Wong‐Parodi, G., et al. (2013) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.03.048 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Ma, G., Lin, J., & Li, N. (2017) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.11.019 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
enCOMPASS — An integrative approach to behavioural change for energy saving
Fraternali, P., Herrera, S., Novak, J., Melenhorst, M., Tzovaras, D. K., Krinidis, S., Rizzoli, A. E., Rottondi, C., & Cellina, F. (2017) · Global Internet of Things Summit (GIoTS) · doi:10.1109/giots.2017.8016256 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Designing Conversational Agents for Energy Feedback
Gnewuch, U., Morana, S., Heckmann, C. S., & Maedche, A. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-91800-6_2 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Do The Effects of Social Nudges Persist? Theory and Evidence from 38 Natural Field ExperimentsPreprint
Brandon, A., Ferraro, P. J., List, J. A., et al. (2017) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Valor, C., Guirado, C. E., Labajo, V., & Cossent, R. (2019) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.109301 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
An open solution to provide personalized feedback for building energy management
Monacchi, A., Versolatto, F., Herold, M., Egarter, D., Tonello, A. M., & Elmenreich, W. (2017) · Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments · doi:10.3233/ais-170422 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Inyim, P., Batouli, M., Reyes, M. P., Carmenate, T., Bobadilla, L., & Mostafavi, A. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10061744 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Raberin, M., Diesmusch, C., Cordier, M., et al. (2015) · L Orthodontie Française · doi:10.1051/orthodfr/2015025 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), G., Stewart, J., USDOE Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE), et al. (2017) · doi:10.2172/1358337 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Fraternali, 2017, Glob, Internet Things Summit, Proc., 2017, 1
- Markus Weiss, 2013, Claire-Michelle Loock, Thorsten Staake, Friedemann Mattern, Evaluating Mobile Phones as, Energy Consumption Feedback Devices
- Milby, 2017, Intelligent Efficiency and Utility Programs, Midwest Energy Effic. Alliance., 1
- Darby, 2006, The effectiveness of feedback on energy consumption: A Review for DEFRA of the literature on metering, billing and direct displays, Environ. Chang. Institute, Univ. Oxford., 1
- Ferrar, 2013, Under Non-Pecuniary Streategies to Influence Behaivor: Evidence from a large Scale Field Expeirment, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 53, 1689
Cited by
Still being checked.
- Authors
- Kim, H. B., Iwamatsu, T., Nishio, K.-I., Komatsu, H., Mukai, T., Odate, Y., & Sasaki, M.
- Affiliations
- Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (JP)
- TEPCO (Japan) (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Kim, Hyun Bae
- Venue
- Energy and Buildings
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-09
- Volume
- 223
- Pages
- 110151
- ISSN
- 0378-7788 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3033606895
- Semantic Scholar
- 0172fdfa38a577f3c8d38c34e0a4dc479d7dbe67
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 4.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Energy and Buildings (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
- Keywords
- push notifications, mobile application, residential electricity consumption, nudge theory, behavior change, personalized notifications, notification timing, energy efficiency services, household energy consumption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review