Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 627

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Technology and the diffusion of renewable energy

Popp, David, Hascic, Ivan, Medhi, Neelakshi·2011·Energy Economics
DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2010.08.007
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eneco.2010.08.007

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Agnolucci, 2006, Use of economic instruments in the German renewable electricity policy, Energy Policy, 34, 3538, 10.1016/j.enpol.2005.08.010 · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2005.08.010
  2. Cohen, 2002, R&D spillovers, patents, and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the United States, Research Policy, 31, 1349, 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00068-9 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Eaton, 1999, International technology diffusion: theory and measurement, International Economic Review, 40, 537, 10.1111/1468-2354.00028 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Gray, 1998, Environmental regulation, investment timing, and technology choice, Journal of Industrial Economics, 46, 235, 10.1111/1467-6451.00070 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Hilton, 2001, Later abatement, faster abatement: evidence and explanations from the global phaseout of leaded gasoline, Journal of Environment and Development, 10, 246, 10.1177/10704965-0101003-03 · DOI
  6. IEA, 2008, 10.1787/co2_fuel-2008-en-fr · doi:10.1787/co2_fuel-2008-en-fr
  7. IEA, 2008, 10.1787/renew-2008-en · DOI
  8. Johnstone, 2010, Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: evidence based on patent counts, Environmental and Resource Economics, 45, 133, 10.1007/s10640-009-9309-1 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Lanjouw, 1996, Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technology, Research Policy, 25, 549, 10.1016/0048-7333(95)00853-5 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Lanjouw, 2004, The quality of ideas: measuring innovation with multiple indicators, Economic Journal, 114, 441, 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00216.x · DOI · Paper page
  11. Kerr, 2003, Policy-induced technology adoption: evidence from the U.S. lead phase down, Journal of Industrial Economics, 51, 317, 10.1111/1467-6451.00203 · DOI · Paper page
  12. McDonald, 2001, Learning rates for energy technologies, Energy Policy, 29, 255, 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00122-1 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Ordover, 1991, A patent system for both diffusion and exclusion, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 43, 10.1257/jep.5.1.43 · DOI
  14. Popp, 2002, Induced innovation and energy prices, American Economic Review, 92, 160, 10.1257/000282802760015658 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Popp, 2003, Pollution control innovations and the Clean Air Act of 1990, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 22, 641, 10.1002/pam.10159 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Popp, 2010, Exploring links between innovation and diffusion: adoption of NOX control technologies at U.S. coal-fired power plants, Environmental and Resource Economics, 45, 319, 10.1007/s10640-009-9317-1 · DOI
  17. Snyder, 2003, The effects of environmental regulation on diffusion: the case of chlorine manufacturing, American Economic Review, 93, 431, 10.1257/000282803321947470 · DOI

Cited by

See all 627

Metadata

Authors
Popp, D., Hascic, I., & Medhi, N.
Venue
Energy Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-07
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
648-662
ISSN
0140-9883 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.eneco.2010.08.007
OpenAlex
W2138045617
Cited by
627
References
0
FWCI
9.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Technology and the diffusion of renewable energy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.08.007
The paper
Popp, D., Hascic, I., & Medhi, N. (2011). Technology and the diffusion of renewable energy. Energy Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.08.007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.