Cited by 187Advanced Battery Technologies ResearchAdvancements in Battery MaterialsElectric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies

A method for state of energy estimation of lithium-ion batteries based on neural network model

Dong, Guangzhong, Zhang, Xu, Zhang, Chenbin, Chen, Zonghai·2015·Energy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.energy.2015.07.120

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dong, G., Zhang, X., Zhang, C., & Chen, Z.
Affiliations
University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
Corresponding author
Chen, Zonghai
Venue
Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
90
Pages
879-888
ISSN
0360-5442 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1145556568
Cited by
187
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 4
FWCI
16.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Energy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Fund of China (61375079)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
Keywords
lithium-ion batteries, state of energy estimation, wavelet neural network, battery modeling, lithium iron phosphate batteries, electric vehicles, battery management systems, terminal voltage, measurement noise reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review