CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 91

Performance comparison of conventional, hybrid, hydrogen and electric urban buses using well to wheel analysis

Correa, G., Muñoz, P., Falaguerra, T., Rodriguez, C.R.·2017·Energy
DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2017.09.066
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.energy.2017.09.066

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If HBs and EBs are fuelled from renewables, they could be especially advantageous within city centres where there is typically heavy traffic and poor air quality due to emissions from CFVs and CFBs.

    “If HB and EBs are fuelled from renewables, they could be especially advantageous within city centres where there is typically heavy traffic and as a result air quality can be poor due to emissions from CFVs and CFBs (Correa et al., 2017;Lajunen and Lipman, 2016;Lajunen and Tammi, 2019).”

    From Electric and hydrogen buses: Shifting from conventionally fuelled cars in the UK (2020) · cites this paper as Correa et al., 2017

  • EBs and HBs offer key advantages over CFBs and CFVs because they do not produce emissions directly from operation since their emissions are produced upstream.

    “Both EBs and HBs offer key advantages over conventionally fuelled buses (CFBs) and other conventionally fuelled vehicles (CFVs), as they do not produce emissions directly from operation since their emissions are produced upstream (Correa et al., 2017;Mekhilef et al., 2012).”

    From Electric and hydrogen buses: Shifting from conventionally fuelled cars in the UK (2020) · cites this paper as Correa et al., 2017

  • If electricity is generated from fossil fuels, the environmental benefits of EBs will be diminished.

    “However, if the electricity is generated from fossil fuels, the environmental benefits will be diminished (Correa et al., 2017;Mekhilef et al., 2012).”

    From Electric and hydrogen buses: Shifting from conventionally fuelled cars in the UK (2020) · cites this paper as Correa et al., 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Nanaki EA, Koroneos CJ. Comparative economic and environmental analysis of conventional, hybrid and electric vehicles the case study of Greece. J Clean Prod 2013;53:261e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.04.010. · DOI
  2. Pilkington A, Dyerson R, Tissier O. The electric vehicle:: patent data as in- dicators of technological development. World Pat Inf 2002;24(1):5e12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0172-2190(01)00065-5. http://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0172219001000655. · DOI
  3. Mekhilef S, Saidur R, Safari A. Comparative study of different fuel cell tech- nologies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2012;16(1):981e9.
  4. Hua T, Ahluwalia R, Eudy L, Singer G, Jermer B, Asselin-miller N, et al. Status of hydrogen fuel cell electric buses worldwide. J Power Sources 2014;269: 975e93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.06.055. · DOI
  5. Lin B, Tan R. Are people willing to pay more for new energy bus fares? Energy 2017;130:365e72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.04.153. http:// linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360544217307296. · DOI
  6. Liu K, Wang J, Yamamoto T, Morikawa T. Modelling the multilevel structure and mixed effects of the factors influencing the energy consumption of electric vehicles. Appl Energy 2016;183:1351e60. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.apenergy.2016.09.082. · DOI
  7. Offer GJ, Howey D, Contestabile M, Clague R, Brandon NP. Comparative analysis of battery electric, hydrogen fuel cell and hybrid vehicles in a future sustainable road transport system. Energy Policy 2010;38(1):24e9. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.040. · DOI
  8. Thomas CE. Fuel cell and battery electric vehicles compared. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2009;34(15):6005e20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.06. 003. · DOI
  9. Hardman S, Steinberger-Wilckens R, van der Horst D. Disruptive innovations: the case for hydrogen fuel cells and battery electric vehicles. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2013;38(35):15438e51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.09. 088. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360319913023112. · DOI
  10. McKenzie EC, Durango-Cohen PL. Environmental life-cycle assessment of transit buses with alternative fuel technology. Transp Res Part D Transp En- viron 2012;17(1):39e47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2011.09.008. http:// linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1361920911001179. · DOI
  11. Wang M. Fuel choices for fuel-cell vehicles: well-to-wheels energy and emission impacts. J Power Sources 2002;112(1):307e21. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00447-0. · DOI
  12. Mizsey P, Newson E. Comparison of different vehicle power trains. J Power Sources 2001;102(1):205e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7753(01)00802- 3. · DOI
  13. Simmons K, Guezennec Y, Onori S. Modeling and energy management control design for a fuel cell hybrid passenger bus. J Power Sources 2014;246:736e46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.08.019. http://linkinghub.elsevier. com/retrieve/pii/S037877531301358X. · DOI
  14. Hu X, Murgovski N, Johannesson L, Egardt B. Energy efficiency analysis of a series plug-in hybrid electric bus with different energy management strate- gies and battery sizes. Appl Energy 2013;111:1001e9. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.06.056. · DOI
  15. Campanari S, Manzolini G, Garcia de la Iglesia F. Energy analysis of electric vehicles using batteries or fuel cells through well-to-wheel driving cycle simulations. J Power Sources 2009;186(2):464e77. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jpowsour.2008.09.115. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/ S0378775308018934. · DOI
  16. Yazdanie M, Noembrini F, Dossetto L, Boulouchos K. A comparative analysis of well-to-wheel primary energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions for the operation of alternative and conventional vehicles in Switzerland, considering various energy carrier production pathways. J Power Sources 2014;249: 333e48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.10.043. · DOI
  17. Torchio MF, Santarelli MG. Energy, environmental and economic comparison of different powertrain/fuel options using well-to-wheels assessment, energy and external costs -european market analysis. Energy 2010;35(10):4156e71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.06.037. · DOI
  18. Mari Svensson A, Møller-Holst S, Gl€ ockner R, Maurstad O. Well-to-wheel study of passenger vehicles in the Norwegian energy system. Energy 2007;32(4):437e45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2006.07.029. http:// linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360544206001939. · DOI
  19. García S anchez JA, L opez Martínez JM, Lumbreras Martín J, Flores Holgado MN. Comparison of Life Cycle energy consumption and GHG emis- sions of natural gas, biodiesel and diesel buses of the Madrid transportation system. Energy 2012;47(1):174e98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012. 09.052. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360544212007311. · DOI
  20. Sharma A, Strezov V. Life cycle environmental and economic impact assess- ment of alternative transport fuels and power-train technologies. Energy 2017;133:1132e41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.04.160. http:// linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360544217307375. · DOI
  21. Karabasoglu O, Michalek J. Influence of driving patterns on life cycle cost and emissions of hybrid and plug-in electric vehicle powertrains. Energy Policy 2013;60:445e61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.047. http://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421513002255. · DOI
  22. Zhou B, Wu Y, Zhou B, Wang R, Ke W, Zhang S, et al. Real-world performance of battery electric buses and their life-cycle benefits with respect to energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions. Energy 2016;96:603e13. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.12.041. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/ retrieve/pii/S0360544215016837. · DOI
  23. Di Sbroiavacca N, Nadal G, Lallana F, Falzon J, Calvin K. Emissions reduction scenarios in the Argentinean energy sector. Energy Econ 2016;56:552e63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.03.021. · DOI
  24. Mahlia T, Tohno S, Tezuka T. A review on fuel economy test procedure for automobiles: implementation possibilities in Malaysia and lessons for other countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2012;16(6):4029e46. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.rser.2012.03.032. · DOI
  25. Diego-Ayala U. An investigation into hybrid power trains for vehicles with regenerative braking. Mech Eng 2007;240:240 (February).
  26. García L. 4 Hydrogen production by steam reforming of natural gas and other nonrenewable feedstocks. In: Compendium of hydrogen energy; 2015. p. 83e107. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-78242-361-4.00004-2. · DOI
  27. Dufour J, Serrano D, Galvez J, Moreno J, Garcia C. Life cycle assessment of processes for hydrogen production. Environmental feasibility and reduction of greenhouse gases emissions. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2009;34(3):1370e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.11.053. http://linkinghub.elsevier. com/retrieve/pii/S0360319908016078. · DOI
  28. Ewan B, Allen R. A figure of merit assessment of the routes to hydrogen. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2005;30(8):809e19. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ijhydene.2005.02.003. · DOI
  29. Martínez P, Dawidowski L, G omez D, Pasquevich D. Life cycle greenhouse emissions of compressed natural gashydrogen mixtures for transportation in Argentina. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2010;35(11):5793e8. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.02.097. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/ S0360319910003976. · DOI
  30. Markel T, Brooker A, Hendricks T, Johnson V, Kelly K, Kramer B, et al. ADVISOR: a systems analysis tool for advanced vehicle modeling. J Power Sources 2002;110(2):255e66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00189- 1. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378775302001891. · DOI
  31. Munoz PM, Moschen EW, Perelmuter GC, Mathe L. Selecci on y dimensiona- miento de un vehículo el ectrico híbrido propulsado por celdas de combus- tible. Comparaci on y an alisis con un vehículo de combusti on interna. In: 2014 IEEE biennial congress of Argentina, argencon 2014; 2014. p. 804e9. https:// doi.org/10.1109/ARGENCON.2014.6868592. · DOI
  32. Sigal A, Cioccale M, Rodríguez C, Leiva E. Study of the natural resource and economic feasibility of the production and delivery of wind hydrogen in the province of C ordoba, Argentina. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2015;40(13):4413e25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.01.149. · DOI
  33. Correa G, Borello F, Santarelli M. Sensitivity analysis of temperature uncer- tainty in an aircraft PEM fuel cell. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2011;36(22): 14745e58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.08.036. · DOI
  34. Correa G, Borello F, Santarelli M. Sensitivity analysis of stack power uncer- tainty in a PEMFC-based powertrain for aircraft application. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2015;40(32):10354e65. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ijhydene.2015.05.133. · DOI
  35. Saxe M, Folkesson A, Alvfors P. Energy system analysis of the fuel cell buses operated in the project: clean Urban Transport for Europe. Energy 2008;33(5): 689e711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2008.01.001. http://linkinghub. elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360544208000029. · DOI
  36. Hidrue MK, Parsons GR. Is there a near-term market for vehicle-to-grid electric vehicles? Appl Energy 2015;151:67e76. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.apenergy.2015.04.051. · DOI · Paper page
  37. Jang J-H, Yan W-M, Chiu H-C, Lui J-Y. Dynamic cell performance of kW-grade proton exchange membrane fuel cell stack with dead-ended anode. Appl Energy 2015;142:108e14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.12.073. · DOI
  38. Schücking M, Jochem P, Fichtner W, Wollersheim O, Stella K. Charging stra- tegies for economic operations of electric vehicles in commercial applications. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 2017;51:173e89. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.trd.2016.11.032. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/ S1361920915301358. · DOI
  39. Mahmoud M, Garnett R, Ferguson M, Kanaroglou P. Electric buses: a review of alternative powertrains. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2016;62:673e84. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.019. · DOI · Paper page
  40. Ball M, Weeda M. The hydrogen economy Vision or reality. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2015;40(25):7903e19. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ijhydene.2015.04.032. · DOI
  41. Hacatoglu K, Dincer I, Rosen MA. Sustainability of a wind-hydrogen energy system: assessment using a novel index and comparison to a conventional gas-fired system. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2016;41(19):8376e85. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.01.135. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/ retrieve/pii/S0360319916002123. · DOI
  42. Hacatoglu K. A systems approach to assessing the sustainability of hybrid community energy systems by. 2014. Ph.D. thesis.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Correa, G., Muñoz, P., Falaguerra, T., & Rodriguez, C. R.
ORCID
Correa, G.
Venue
Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-12
Volume
141
Pages
537-549
ISSN
0360-5442
DOI
10.1016/j.energy.2017.09.066
Cited by
91
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Funders
  • PICT 2015 (0145)
  • PIO (15920150100001CO)
  • SECyT-UNC 2014 (30720130100644CB)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review