Electric and hydrogen buses: Shifting from conventionally fuelled cars in the UK
Open accessAbstract
For the UK to meet their national target of net zero emissions as part of the central Paris Agreement target, further emphasis needs to be placed on decarbonizing public transport and moving away from personal transport (conventionally fuelled vehicles (CFVs) and electric vehicles (EVs)). Electric buses (EBs) and hydrogen buses (HBs) have the potential to fulfil requirements if powered from low carbon renewable energy sources. A comparison of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions produced from conventionally fuelled buses (CFB), EBs and HBs between 2017 and 2050 under four National Grid electricity scenarios was conducted. In addition, emissions per person at different vehicle capacity levels (100%, 75%, 50% and 25%) were projected for CFBs, HBs, EBs and personal transport assuming a maximum of 80 passengers per bus and four per personal vehicle. Results indicated that CFVs produced 30 gCO2 km−1 per person compared to 16.3 gCO2 km−1 per person by CFBs by 2050. At 100% capacity, under the two-degree scenario, CFB emissions were 36 times higher than EBs, 9 times higher than HBs and 12 times higher than EVs in 2050. Cumulative emissions under all electricity scenarios remained lower for EBs and HBs. Policy makers need to focus on encouraging a modal shift from personal transport towards sustainable public transport, primarily EBs as the lowest level emitting vehicle type. Simple electrification of personal vehicles will not meet the required targets. Simultaneously, CFBs need to be replaced with EBs and HBs if the UK is going to meet emission targets.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This paper projects UK CO₂ emissions from conventionally fuelled buses (CFBs), electric buses (EBs), and hydrogen buses (HBs) from 2017 to 2050 under four National Grid electricity scenarios, comparing them with conventionally fuelled vehicles (CFVs) and electric vehicles (EVs). It concludes that EBs produce the lowest operating emissions per person and that a modal shift from personal vehicles to sustainable public transport is needed for the UK to meet net-zero targets.
Key findings
- At 100% capacity under the two-degree scenario, 2050 CFB emissions were 36 times higher than EBs, 9 times higher than HBs, and 12 times higher than EVs.
- At 100% capacity, CFVs produced 30.0 gCO₂ km⁻¹ per person in 2017 and 21.8 in 2050, while CFBs produced 16.3 in 2017 and 14.2 in 2050; EBs produced 5.3 in 2017 and 0.4 in 2050, and HBs 12.9 in 2017 and 1.6 in 2050.
- Under the two-degree scenario, EBs emitted 3.2 gCO₂ km⁻¹ per person at 100% capacity versus 7.8 for HBs; at 25% capacity, EBs emitted 12.8 versus 31.2 for HBs.
- Cumulative 2017–2050 emissions under the two-degree scenario were 19.8 MtCO₂ for EBs, 48.1 MtCO₂ for HBs, 169.4 MtCO₂ for EVs, 258.3 MtCO₂ for CFBs, and 1315.7 MtCO₂ for CFVs.
Methods
- The study projected CO₂ emissions from CFBs, EBs, and HBs between 2017 and 2050 under four UK National Grid electricity scenarios: two-degree, steady progression, community renewables, and consumer evolution.
- It used UK Government and National Grid data plus the TEAM-UK model for bus numbers and distance travelled, and calculated emissions per person at 100%, 75%, 50%, and 25% vehicle capacity assuming 80 passengers per bus and four per personal vehicle.
- EB modelling used 1.2 kWh km⁻¹ and an inefficiency factor of 1.18; HB modelling used 1.8 kWh km⁻¹, electrolysis inefficiency of 1.72, and a fuel-cell conversion factor of 1.25; SMR and coal gasification with and without CCS were analysed for 2018 only.
Limitations
- The paper states it does not directly consider embedded carbon costs of vehicles, including decommissioning CFVs and constructing new vehicles, and that SMR/coal gasification could only be analysed for 2018 due to data certainty limitations.
- The paper states EB energy consumption and conversion factors were kept constant through 2050, so EB emissions may be overestimated, and hydrogen estimates do not include life-cycle emissions from the generation source.
- The text makes evident that the model is simple and assumes all electric modes are electric from 2017, that cars are at full capacity in some comparisons despite average CFV occupancy of 1.6, and that costs, infrastructure, and behavioural drivers of modal shift are discussed but not fully modelled.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
1 of 32 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged
- Premisecitation
If HBs and EBs are fuelled from renewables, they could be especially advantageous within city centres where there is typically heavy traffic and poor air quality due to emissions from CFVs and CFBs.
“If HB and EBs are fuelled from renewables, they could be especially advantageous within city centres where there is typically heavy traffic and as a result air quality can be poor due to emissions from CFVs and CFBs (Correa et al., 2017;Lajunen and Lipman, 2016;Lajunen and Tammi, 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked - Findingown data
Cumulative emissions under all electricity scenarios remained lower for EBs and HBs.
“Cumulative emissions under all electricity scenarios remained lower for EBs and HBs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CFVs produced 30 gCO2 km-1 per person compared to 16.3 gCO2 km-1 per person by CFBs by 2050.
“Results indicated that CFVs produced 30 gCO 2 km -1 per person compared to 16.3 gCO 2 km -1 per person by CFBs by 2050.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At 50% CFB capacity, emissions per person are approximately equal to 100% capacity CFV usage (32.6 vs 30 gCO2 km-1 per person).
“However, as soon as public transport use (i.e.CFBs) increases to 50% then this is approximately equal to 100% capacity CFV usage (32.6 gCO 2 km -1 and 30 gCO 2 km -1 respectively).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At 100% capacity under the two-degree scenario, CFB emissions were 9 times higher than HBs in 2050.
“At 100% capacity, under the two-degree scenario, CFB emissions were 36 times higher than EBs, 9 times higher than HBs and 12 times higher than EVs in 2050.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingreasoning
In 2050, 25% capacity CFBs would produce 65% of the carbon emissions per person produced by 25% capacity CFVs.
“Therefore in 2050, 25% capacity CFBs would produce 65% the level of carbon emissions produced by 25% capacity CFVs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Under the two-degree scenario, hydrogen buses produce the lowest level of emissions among the four National Grid scenarios.
“Results indicate that the twodegree scenario will produce the lowest level of emissions for HBs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
- Findingown data
At 100% capacity under the two-degree scenario, CFB emissions were 36 times higher than EBs in 2050.
“At 100% capacity, under the two-degree scenario, CFB emissions were 36 times higher than EBs, 9 times higher than HBs and 12 times higher than EVs in 2050.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Under all four National Grid scenarios, emissions from electric buses decrease if all urban buses were electric.
“For EBs, all scenarios saw a decrease in the level of emissions produced if all urban buses were electric.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
In 2050, full capacity CFBs would produce 66% of the carbon emissions per person produced by full capacity CFVs.
“Therefore in 2050, full capacity CFBs would produce 66% the level of carbon emissions produced by full capacity CFVs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
If public transport usage remains low while using conventional fuel, full capacity cars produce less emissions per person than 25% capacity CFBs.
“The analyses indicate that if the usage of public transport remains low while using conventional fuel, full capacity cars produce less emissions per person than low capacity (25%) CFBs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
There is a slight decrease projected in the total distance travelled by each bus by 4% from 40,791 km to 39,224 km in 2050.
“There is a slight decrease projected in the total distance travelled by each bus by 4% from 40,791 km to 39,224 km in 2050.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
In 2050, half capacity CFBs would produce 65% of the carbon emissions per person produced by half capacity CFVs.
“Therefore in 2050, half capacity CFBs would produce 65% the level of carbon emissions produced by half capacity CFVs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Under the steady progression scenario, electric bus emissions decrease by 78% by 2050.
“The steady progression scenario, the most realistic scenario for renewable energy generation also saw a decrease of emissions by 78% by 2050.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
A CFV at 50% capacity (two individuals) produces 60 gCO2 km-1 per person in 2017, decreasing to 43.5 gCO2 km-1 per person by 2050.
“If a CFV was at 50% capacity with two individuals travelling, per person, emissions would be 60 gCO 2 km -1 per person in 2017 decreasing to 43.5 gCO 2 km -1 per person by 2050.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
EBs are the lowest level emitting vehicle type.
“primarily EBs as the lowest level emitting vehicle type.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Over the time frame 2017 to 2050, the number of buses is projected to increase by 19% from 141,365 in 2017 to 168,836 in 2050.
“Over the time frame of between 2017 to 2050, the number of buses is projected to increase by 19% from 141,365 in 2017 to 168,836 in 2050.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Under the two-degree scenario, hydrogen bus emissions decrease by 91% between 2017 and 2050.
“Between 2017 and 2050, the two-degree saw a decrease in the level of emissions 91%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
- Findingown data
At 100% capacity under the two-degree scenario, CFB emissions were 12 times higher than EVs in 2050.
“At 100% capacity, under the two-degree scenario, CFB emissions were 36 times higher than EBs, 9 times higher than HBs and 12 times higher than EVs in 2050.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
A bus at full capacity produces 16.3 gCO2 km-1 per person in 2017 and 14.4 gCO2 km-1 per person by 2050.
“A bus at full capacity produces 16.3 gCO 2 km -1 per person in 2017 and 14.4 gCO 2 km -1 per person by 2050.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Under the two-degree scenario, electric bus emissions decrease by 91% between 2017 and 2050.
“The largest decrease in the level of emissions was under the two-degree scenario which saw a decrease of 91% of emissions between 2017 and 2050.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cumulative emissions of CFVs and EVs remain high.
“Cumulative emissions of CFVs and EVs remains high, therefore, demonstrating the need to move away from CFVs, even towards CFBs, whilst the infrastructure is built for more sustainable EBs and HBs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cumulative CFB emissions in the UK between 2017 and 2050 are 258.3 MtCO2.
“Cumulative emissions from CFBs in the UK between 2017 and 2050 are calculated as 258.3 MtCO 2 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Under the community renewables scenario, hydrogen bus emissions decrease by 87%.
“The community renewables scenario saw a decrease in the level of emissions 87%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
- Findingown data
Overall, electric bus emissions are much lower than hydrogen bus emissions by 2050.
“Overall results indicate that the level of emissions for EBs is much lower than those produced from HBs by 2050.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
- Findingown data
EB emissions per person remained lower than equivalent capacity values for CFBs, CFVs and EVs.
“Furthermore, these values remained lower than the equivalent capacity values for CFBs, CFVs and EVs demonstrating that promotion of sustainable public transport is essential to reduce the UK's transport emissions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
- Findingown data
Under all electricity generation scenarios, hydrogen bus emissions using electrolysis in 2018 (5.5 MtCO2 without CCS) are lower than using SMR or coal gasification.
“Furthermore, comparing Table 4 with the results of hydrogen generation in section 3.3, under all electricity generation scenarios, emissions using electrolysis were lower in 2018 at 5.5 MtCO 2 without CCS than SMR or coal gasification.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
- Findingown data
The level of emissions produced from CFBs, HBs and EBs are much lower per person than from CFVs and EVs.
“Our results indicate that the level of emissions produced from CFBs, HBs and EBs are much lower per person than from CFVs and EVs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At 100% capacity, hydrogen bus emissions are 7.8 gCO2 km-1 per person compared to 3.2 gCO2 km-1 per person for electric buses.
“For 100% capacity, HBs produced 7.8 gCO 2 km -1 per person compared to 3.2 gCO 2 km -1 per person for EBs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
- Findingnone given
EBs produce the lowest level of emission from the three bus types studied.
“From our study, we conclude that EBs produce the lowest level of emission from the three bus types studied”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Overall, EBs produce the lowest level of cumulative emissions between 2017 and 2050 under all electricity mix scenarios, followed by HBs.
“Overall EBs, followed by HBs, produce the lowest level of cumulative emissions between 2017 and 2050 under all electricity mix scenarios and should be integrated to reduce transport emissions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
- Findingown data
Electric bus emissions per person remain lower than any other transport type under all capacity scenarios.
“This highlights that the level of emissions produced per person remains lower for EBs under all capacity scenarios than any other transport type.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
- Findingreasoning
Electric bus emissions are almost half those of hydrogen buses under all four scenarios.
“EB emission are almost half that of HBs under all four scenarios.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
- Findingown data
For hydrogen buses, the difference in emission levels between the best-case (two-degree) and worst-case (consumer evolution) scenarios is 1.3 MtCO2.
“For HBs, under the best-case scenario (two-degrees) and worst-case scenario (consumer evolution) there is 1.3 MtCO 2 difference in emission levels.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
- Findingown data
Under all four electricity generation scenarios, emissions per person from EBs remained lower than HBs at all capacity levels.
“Under all four electricity generation scenarios, emissions produced per person from EBs remained lower than HBs at all capacity levels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
- Findingown data
Under the two-degree scenario and assuming 100% capacity, emissions per person are lowest when using EBs in both 2017 and 2050.
“By comparing the gCO 2 km -1 per person for CFVs, EVs, CFBs, HBs and EBs under the two-degree scenario and assuming 100% capacity, results indicate that emissions are lowest per person when using EBs in both 2017 and 2050.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
- Findingown data
Cumulative CFV emissions in the UK between 2017 and 2050 are 1315.7 MtCO2.
“Cumulative emissions of CFVs between the same time frame was 1315.7 MtCO 2 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Under the two-degree scenario by 2050, hydrogen bus emissions were 2.5 times higher at 0.5 MtCO2 than electric bus emissions at 0.2 MtCO2.
“Under the two-degree scenario by 2050, emissions from HBs were still 2.5 times higher at 0.5 MtCO 2 than those from EBs at 0.2 MtCO 2.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
- Premisecitation
Transitioning towards electricity generated from sustainable sources is essential for the UK to meet its net zero emissions target.
“Transitioning towards electricity generated from sustainable sources is essential for the UK to meet its net zero emissions target (Sithole et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sithole et al., 2016 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Interpretationown data
Simple electrification of personal vehicles will not meet the required targets.
“Simple electrification of personal vehicles will not meet the required targets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The carbon intensity of power generation will need to be reduced from 0.5 tCO2 MWh-1 to 0.045 tCO2 MWh-1 by 2035.
“Furthermore, the carbon intensity of power generation will need to be reduced from 0.5 tCO 2 MWh -1 to 0.045 tCO 2 MWh -1 by 2035 (Heuberger et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Heuberger et al., 2017 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Premisecitation
For electrolysis to be a true low carbon process, electricity needs to be generated from renewable or nuclear energy sources.
“For this to be a true low carbon process, electricity needs to be generated from renewable or nuclear energy sources (Patyk et al., 2013;Suleman et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
Switching to H2 generation purely from SMR may not be the most efficient emissions reducing policy because SMR produces CO and CO2.
“These processes produce CO and CO 2 respectively which are among some of the most harmful emissions so switching to H 2 generation purely from this method may not be the most efficient emissions reducing policy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
If electricity is generated from fossil fuels, the environmental benefits of EBs will be diminished.
“However, if the electricity is generated from fossil fuels, the environmental benefits will be diminished (Correa et al., 2017;Mekhilef et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Correa et al., 2017 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- cites Mekhilef et al., 2012
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisereasoning
Incorporating CCS can help reduce emissions from SMR by permanently storing CO2 emissions in geological formations deep underground.
“As this method produces CO 2 , incorporating CCS can help reduce emissions by permanently storing these emissions in geological formations deep underground.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The average occupancy rate for personal CFVs is 1.6 individuals per vehicle.
“the average occupancy rate for personal CFVs is 1.6 individuals per vehicle (DfT, 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites DfT, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Study design and conductreasoning
The projections used are the best available energy usage and network supply data currently available for the study period 2017-2050 as they include current and planned generating capacity and its economic life.
“These projections are the best available energy usage and network supply data currently available for the study period of between 2017 and 2050 as they include current and planned generating capacity and its economic life.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The transition to electric power for EBs and HBs will further increase the demand for low-carbon electricity generation.
“The transition to electric power for EBs and HBs will further increase the demand for low-carbon electricity generation (Eriksson and Gray, 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Eriksson and Gray, 2017 source
- Premisereasoning
The true environmental impact of EBs and HBs is dependent upon non-tailpipe emissions from fuel/energy production.
“This means their true environmental impact is dependent upon non-tailpipe emissions from fuel/energy production.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
True emissions from fuel cell vehicles depend on the method used to produce H2, which determines the total environmental impact.
“True emissions will depend on a method to produce H 2 which will determine the total environmental impact (Dicks et al., 2004); it is these source emissions that are considered here.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dicks et al., 2004 source
- Premisecitation
Within the electricity sector, emissions need to be reduced by 92% by 2035 if the UK wants to meet their targets.
“Within the electricity sector, emissions need to be reduced by 92% by 2035 if the UK wants to meet their targets (DECC, 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites DECC, 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Because the method does not include embedded carbon costs of personal CFV operation, the true emission switch level is likely below 50% CFB capacity.
“Given that this method does not include the embedded carbon costs related to personal CFV operation, it is likely that the true emission switch level is below 50% CFB capacity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
A lifecycle of H2 production from SMR using natural gas determined that this method is considered the least environmentally friendly method of H2 generation due to abiotic depletion and global warming potential.
“A lifecycle of H 2 production from SMR using natural gas determined that this method of production is considered the least environmentally friendly method of H 2 generation due to abiotic depletion and global warming potential (Suleman et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Suleman et al., 2015 source
- Interpretationreasoning
For electricity to be produced for EBs and HBs, incorporation of CCS is necessary.
“Finally, for electricity to be produced for EBs and HBs, incorporation of CCS is necessary”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Technology is not currently in place for 100% renewable electricity generation.
- Rests on an assumption: Gas generation will be required as dispatchable power.
- Rests on an assumption: CCS will help to mitigate some of the emissions produced from fossil electricity generation that provide dispatchable power when renewable generation is low.
- Interpretationreasoning
If H2 is going to continue to be generated from SMR using natural gas, then emission levels will remain high.
“If H 2 is going to continue to be generated from SMR using natural gas, then emission levels will remain high.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Larger capacity EBs and HBs produce lower emissions than the equivalent total power level EVs.
“In addition, lithium costs required by EVs and EB's are inversely proportional in terms of emissions, therefore larger capacity EBs and HBs produce lower emissions than the equivalent total power level EV's (Ellingsen et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ellingsen et al., 2014 source
- Interpretationreasoning
The emissions benefit of integrating both bus types in favour of CFVs, EVs and CFBs depends on how the electricity is generated and stored.
“This, however, is dependent upon how the electricity is generated and stored.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
With a higher renewable and nuclear energy percentage, the total level of operation emissions would be lower.
“With a higher renewable and nuclear energy percentage, the total level of operation emissions would be lower.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The cost differential between HBs/EBs and CFBs will reduce as the technology becomes commonly used.
“This cost differential will reduce as the technology becomes commonly used.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Switching directly to electric buses from CFVs/CFBs will have the largest impact on emissions, rather than going through hydrogen powered vehicles.
“Switching to EB directly from CFV/CFBs will therefore have the largest impact on emissions, rather than going through secondary options such as hydrogen powered vehicles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
- Interpretationreasoning
Electrolysis is the most environmentally friendly form of hydrogen generation.
“Therefore, although significant H 2 production for transport is not entirely feasible on such a large scale yet, electrolysis is the most environmentally friendly form of generation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
- Interpretationreasoning
If the energy sector is not decarbonised, any environmental benefits of HBs and EBs will be diminished.
“If the energy sector is not decarbonised, then any environmental benefits will be diminished .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
- Interpretationreasoning
If proportionally more individuals chose to commute by bus, then total transport emissions would be reduced.
“If proportionally more individuals chose to commute by bus, then total transport emissions would be reduced.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Emissions can only truly be reduced if the UK public opt for buses instead of private vehicles.
“however, emissions can only truly be reduced if the UK public are opting for buses instead of private vehicles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Future development of EBs and HBs may be dependent upon occupancy and cost.
“This is a 'chicken and egg' scenario as although small commercial scale production of EBs and HBs allows gradual introduction to the UK bus fleet, future development may be dependent upon occupancy and cost.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 45
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 16
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningAt 50% capacity, CFB emissions are 32.5 gCO2 km-1 per person in 2017 and 28.5 gCO2 km-1 per person in 2050.
“However, at 50% capacity, emissions from a CFB would almost half that of CFVs at 32.5 gCO 2 km -1 per person in 2017.However due to minimal technological advances if a CFB was at 50% capacity in 2050, emissions would be expected to be 28.5 gCO 2 km -1 per person.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningCFB emissions are projected to peak in 2030 and by 2050 be 0.02 MtCO2 higher than in 2017.
“Emissions for CFBs are expected to peak in 2030 before decreasing, however by 2050, emissions are expected to be 0.02 MtCO 2 higher than in 2017.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA standard four-person car at 100% capacity produced 30 gCO2 km-1 per person in 2017 and could decrease to 21.7 gCO2 km-1 per person by 2050.
“Fig. 1 demonstrates that a standard four-person car produced 30 gCO 2 km -1 per person at 100% capacity in 2017.Due to technological advances, emissions per person could decrease to 21.7 gCO 2 km -1 per person by 2050.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
FindingreasoningAt the average CFV occupancy rate of 1.6 individuals per vehicle, carbon emissions per person are significantly more than for 25% capacity CFBs.
“Carbon emissions for this CFV capacity are significantly more than that of 25% CFBs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenA bus at 25% capacity produces 65.2 gCO2 km-1 per person in 2017, decreasing to 56.9 gCO2 km-1 per person.
“A bus at 25% capacity would produce 65.2 gCO 2 km -1 per person in 2017, decreasing to 56.9 gCO 2 km -1 per person.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataUnder the steady progression scenario, hydrogen bus emissions decrease by 78% over 2017-2050, with a secondary peak in 2030.
“Under the steady progression scenario, emissions decreased by 78% over the studied period, though the decrease was not linear and contained a secondary peak in 2030.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningCFV emissions are projected to peak in 2020 at 41.5 MtCO2 and then decrease to 7.3 MtCO2 below 2017 levels.
“Emissions for CFVs are expected to peak in 2020 to 41.5 MtCO 2 before decreasing by 7.3 MtCO 2 below 2017 levels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingnone givenA car at 25% capacity could produce 120 gCO2 km-1 per person in 2050, decreasing to 87 gCO2 km-1 per person by 2050.
“Whereas a car could produce 120 gCO 2 km -1 per person in 2050, decreasing to 87 gCO 2 km -1 per person by 2050.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn 2017, CFVs produced 5 times more emissions than CFBs; by 2050, CFVs produced 4.5 times more emissions than CFBs.
“Emission predictions indicate that in 2017, CFVs under both scenarios produced 5 times more emissions than CFBs.By 2050, emissions are 4.5 higher.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataUnder the two-degree scenario at 50% capacity in 2017, CFV emissions per person are almost double those of HBs and six times those of EBs.
“Results indicate that under this scenario, the gCO 2 km -1 per person for CFVs at 50% capacity are almost double that of HBs and six times that of EBs in 2017.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataTable 6 indicates that EVs produce less gCO2 km-1 per person than HBs in 2050.
“Table 6 indicates that EVs produce less gCO 2 km -1 per person than HBs in 2050, this remains unlikely as 100% EVs by 2050 is not likely achievable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt 50% capacity, CFVs produce the highest level of emissions in gCO2 km-1 per person, followed by EVs, then all bus types.
“Emissions at 50% capacity demonstrate that CFVs produce the highest level of emissions in gCO 2 km -1 per person, followed by EVs, then all bus types”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt 50% capacity, hydrogen bus emissions are 15.6 gCO2 km-1 per person, while electric bus emissions are almost half at 6.4 gCO2 km-1 per person.
“Under 50% capacity, emissions from HBs were 15.6 gCO 2 km -1 per person with emissions from EBs at almost half this level producing 6.4 gCO 2 km -1 per person.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenHBs use 1.8 kWh km-1, EBs use 1.2 kWh km-1, and EVs use 0.17 kWh km-1.
“Through comparison of kWh km -1 , HBs use 1.8 kWh km -1 , EBs use 1.2 kWh km -1 , whereas EVs use 0.17 kWh km -1 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe worst-case hydrogen bus scenario remains 5.7 MtCO2 lower than CFB production, with CFBs producing around four times more emissions in total in 2050.
“The worst-case scenario remains 5.7 MtCO 2 lower than the CFB productions, with CFBs producing around four times more emissions in total in 2050.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataWithout CCS, hydrogen bus emissions using steam methane reforming are 11 times higher and using coal gasification are 19 times higher than with CCS.
“Without CCS, emissions using steam methane reforming was 11 times higher and for coal gasification, emissions were 19 times higher.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationElectrolysis using CCS would produce 15 gCO2 kWh-1 and result in emissions of 0.25 MtCO2 in 2018.
“As a more advanced technology, electrolysis using CCS would produce 15 gCO 2 kWh -1 (CCC, 2018).This would result in emissions produced of 0.25 MtCO 2 in 2018.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites CCC, 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataBy 2050, even with technological improvements, CFVs remain the highest emitting transport mode, producing 55 times more emissions than EBs and 14 times more than HBs.
“By 2050, even with technological improvements CFVs remain the highest operating emitting transport mode producing 55 times more emission than EBs and 14 times more emission than HBs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningCumulative emissions of EVs are substantially higher than for both bus types, due to the higher number of EVs and distance travelled projected between 2017 and 2050.
“Results indicate that the cumulative emissions of EVs are substantially higher than for both bus types which is due to the higher number of EVs and distance travelled projected between 2017 and 2050.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt 75% capacity, hydrogen bus emissions are 10.4 gCO2 km-1 per person, while electric bus emissions are 4.3 gCO2 km-1 per person.
“For 75% capacity, HB produced 10.4 gCO 2 km -1 per person, with EBs producing 4.3 gCO 2 km -1 per person.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCFB emissions at 50% capacity remain relatively constant over the time frame and are almost half of CFV emissions in 2017.
“CFB emissions remain relatively constant at 50% capacity within the time frame at almost half of CFV emissions in 2017.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt 25% capacity, hydrogen bus emissions are 31.2 gCO2 km-1 per person, while electric bus emissions are almost three times lower at 12.8 gCO2 km-1 per person.
“Results indicate that under the 25% capacity emissions from HBs are 31.2gCO 2 km -1 per person, whereas for EBs emissions are almost three times lower at 12.8 gCO 2 km -1 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataUnder the consumer evolution scenario, hydrogen bus emissions decrease by 69%, with a secondary peak in 2031 at 3.5 MtCO2 before decreasing to 1.84 MtCO2.
“The consumer evolution scenario saw the lowest decrease in emissions of 69%, with emission levels having a secondary peak in 2031 at 3.5 MtCO 2 before decreasing to 1.84 MtCO 2.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThis paper does not directly consider the embedded carbon costs of vehicles including the decommissioning of CFVs and the construction of vehicles.
“This paper does not directly consider the embedded carbon costs of vehicles including the decommissioning of CFVs and the construction of vehicles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationNo single technology can make transportation carbon neutral.
“Although no single technology can make transportation carbon neutral (Mathiesen et al., 2015), this paper will focus on the environmental operating emissions of EBs and HBs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mathiesen et al., 2015 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe UK is one of the best suitable locations for CCS implementation as there are suitable carbon sinks and appropriate offshore infrastructure.
“Furthermore, the UK is one of the best suitable locations for CCS implementation as there are suitable carbon sinks (depleted oil and gas reservoirs and aquifers) with appropriate offshore infrastructure (BEIS, 2019d).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites BEIS, 2019d
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationApproximately 99% of the H2 produced and consumed within industry is generated by natural gas reforming, producing high levels of CO2 as by-products.
“Approximately 99% of the H 2 produced and consumed within industry is generated by natural gas reforming (Hosseini and Wahid, 2016;Mohammadfam and Zarei, 2015;Ozalp, 2008) producing high levels of CO 2 as by-products (National Academy of Engineering, 2004).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe projected increase in CFB emissions by 2050 relative to 2017 is due to a 19% increase in the number of buses and a 3% decrease in total distance travelled.
“This is due to a 19% increase in the number of buses and 3% decrease in the total distance travelled.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Paris Agreement has set a target to limit global warming to less than 2°C above pre-industrial temperatures and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C above pre-industrial temperatures within this century.
“The Paris Agreement has set a target to limit global warming to less than 2 °C above pre-industrial temperatures and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102350°C above pre-industrial temperatures within this century (Pietzcker et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pietzcker et al., 2014 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEBs and HBs offer key advantages over CFBs and CFVs because they do not produce emissions directly from operation since their emissions are produced upstream.
“Both EBs and HBs offer key advantages over conventionally fuelled buses (CFBs) and other conventionally fuelled vehicles (CFVs), as they do not produce emissions directly from operation since their emissions are produced upstream (Correa et al., 2017;Mekhilef et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Correa et al., 2017 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- cites Mekhilef et al., 2012
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGHG emissions will need to reach optimum levels and decline as fast as possible to meet the Paris targets.
“In addition, GHG emissions will need to reach optimum levels and decline as fast as possible to meet these targets (Pietzcker et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pietzcker et al., 2014 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTo use H2 for fuel, significant infrastructure improvements are needed as currently there are low numbers of H2 vehicles in use within the UK.
“To use H 2 for fuel, significant infrastructure improvements are needed as currently there are low numbers of H 2 vehicles in use within the UK (Southall and Khare, 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Southall and Khare, 2016 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSMR is one of the most widespread and least expensive methods of H2 generation.
“SMR is one of the most widespread and least expensive methods of H 2 generation (Ogden et al., 2000).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ogden et al., 2000 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenExpanding and learning from policies in areas that have seen increases in public transport use, such as London, would further increase the emissions decrease seen across the country.
“Expanding and learning from policies in areas that have seen increases in public transport use, such as London, would further increase the emissions decrease seen across the country.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAt least 20 CFVs could be taken off the road if buses were fully utilized, significantly reducing road transport emissions and congestion.
“By assuming the maximum capacity of an average bus is 80 and a small CFV is four, as least 20 CFVs could be taken off the road if buses were fully utilized, significantly reducing road transport emissions and congestion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIf increased use of public transport is achieved by 2050, there is a reduced need for the number of small EVs on the road, which can help decrease transport emissions and partially mitigate increases in power generation, congestion, safety and reduction of CFV and EV infrastructure.
“If increased use of public transport is achieved by 2050 there is a reduced need for the number of small EVs on the road which can help decrease transport emissions as well as partially mitigate increases in power generation, congestion, safety and reduction of CFV and EV infrastructure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationHBs use more electrical energy due to conversion and storage losses, and are expected to produce a higher level of operating emissions than battery powered EBs.
“HBs use more electrical energy due to the energy required to convert electricity to H 2 and back to electricity with the potential for loss in storage; therefore, it is expected they will produce a higher level of operating emissions than battery powered EBs (Shinnar, 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shinnar, 2003 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe projected decrease in total CFV emissions is due to technological improvements and a 9% decrease in distance travelled despite a 25% increase in the number of vehicles between 2017 and 2050.
“For CFVs, this decrease in total emissions is due to technological improvements, a decrease of 9% in the distance travelled despite a 25% increase in the number of vehicles between 2017 and 2050.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningTo ensure consistency between the different fuel type models, the number of buses and distance travelled remained constant.
“To ensure consistency between the different fuel type models, the number of buses and distance travelled remained constant (Appendix A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe projected decrease in distance travelled by each bus is because distance projections are based upon the need to fulfil demand, which is estimated partly upon projected decrease in population size, resulting in a decrease in the need for public transport.
“This is since distance projections are based upon the need to fulfil demand, which in turn is estimated partly based upon the projected decrease in population size, resulting in a decrease in the need for public transport.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe UK currently faces the 'chicken and egg problem' as although commercial H2 vehicles exist, future development is dependent upon widespread fuelling infrastructure to enable sales of H2 vehicles.
“The UK currently faces the 'chicken and egg problem' as although commercial H 2 vehicles exist, future development is dependent upon the widespread fuelling infrastructure to enable sales of H 2 vehicles (Kriston et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kriston et al., 2010 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationown dataIf the UK is to meet its emission targets, the travelling public need to move away from individual transport towards sustainable public transport.
“Results from this study, particularly in Fig. 5, indicate that if the UK is to meet its emission targets, the travelling public need to move away from individual transport towards sustainable public transport.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningEBs are more suited to shorter routes within cities such as London.
“Due to current technological advancements, EBs are more suited to shorter routes within cities such as London”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningWithout a modal shift towards public transport, the UK will be unlikely to meet its net zero emissions target.
“Without a modal shift towards public transport, the UK will be unlikely to meet their net zero emissions target.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningIf HBs are to be more widely utilised, then the preferred method of hydrogen generation would be electrolysis using renewable energy technologies.
“If HBs are to be more widely utilised, then the preferred method of hydrogen generation would be electrolysis using renewable energy technologies”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataWidespread utilisation of HBs or EBs will be required if the UK is going to meet national emission targets, because technological advances are not a strong enough mitigating factor for CFBs to meet targets and neither is a simple switch to personal EVs.
“Results from the analysis presented in this paper indicate that widespread utilisation of HBs or EBs will be required if the UK is going to meet national emission targets, as technological advances are not a strong enough mitigating factor for CFBs to meet targets and neither is a simple switch to personal EVs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIf an HB has more than 10 passengers and an EB has more than 7, the bus has less emissions than a full electric car.
“So, if an HB has more than 10 passengers and an EB has more than 7, the bus has less emissions than a full electric car.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe results do not take into consideration life cycle emissions and assume that all electric modes of transport are electric from 2017.
“Results do not take into consideration life cycle emissions and assume that all electric modes of transport are electric from 2017, therefore although”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBus operating costs per person are likely to be higher unless fares subsidies are implemented, which could result in fewer passengers.
“Bus operating costs per person are likely to be higher, unless fares subsidies are implemented, which could result in fewer passengers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningIt is unlikely consumers will use the bus system more if faced with higher fares and cheaper unsustainable transport options.
“To reduce total costs, more individuals will need to use the bus system, however it is unlikely consumers will do this if faced with higher fares and choose cheaper, unsustainable transport options.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenHBs have a larger range and may be suited to longer distances between cities and rural services.
“where as HBs have a larger range and may be suited to longer distances between cities and rural services.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningHydrogen buses are less efficient than direct electric transport because H2 generation requires electricity to be converted to H2 and back again.
“This is to be expected as H 2 generation requires electricity to be converted to H 2 and back again and will therefore be less efficient than direct electric transport.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe additional costs of HBs and EBs are due to electric mechanisms and above all lack of mass production.
“The additional costs are due to the electric mechanisms, for example, the battery package, electric motor and auxiliary system, but above all lack of mass production (Feng and Figliozzi, 2013;Mahmoud et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWithout CCS implementation, the positive effects on dropping emissions from SMR would be dampened by the GHG emissions of SMR, furthering the likelihood of the UK missing its emissions targets of net zero.
“without CCS implementation the positive effects on dropping emissions would be dampened by the GHG emissions of SMR, furthering the likelihood of the UK missing its emissions targets of net zero.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenHBs can be fuelled through electrolysis using excess renewable energy and with H2 generation from SMR using natural gas combined with CCS for low emissions.
“HBs can be fuelled through electrolysis using excess renewable energy and with H 2 generation from SMR using natural gas combined with CCS for low emissions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCurrently HBs cost around one million euros per bus, a standard EB costs 450,000 euros compared to a standard CFB of 250,000 euros.
“Currently HBs cost around one million euros per bus, a standard EB costs 450,000 euros compared to a standard CFBs of 250,000 euros (Hydrogen Europe, 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hydrogen Europe, 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBoth HBs and EBs are expected to produce significantly lower levels of emissions compared to CFBs by 2050, but this is dependent on the energy generation method.
“Both HBs and EBs are expected to produce significantly lower levels of emissions compared to CFBs by 2050, however this is dependent on the energy generation method.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningCCS is required to reduce emissions as far as possible whilst infrastructure is being implemented to achieve complete decarbonisation of electricity generation.
“As technology currently isn't in place for 100% renewable electricity generation and gas generation will be required as dispatchable power, CCS is required to reduce emissions as far as possible whilst infrastructure is being implemented to achieve complete decarbonisation of electricity generation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Technology is not currently in place for 100% renewable electricity generation.
- Rests on an assumption: Gas generation will be required as dispatchable power.
- Rests on an assumption: CCS will help to mitigate some of the emissions produced from fossil electricity generation that provide dispatchable power when renewable generation is low.
The authors state this as an assumption.
The energy required during hydrogen generation is the same regardless of source.
“It is assumed that the energy required during the hydrogen generation would be the same regardless of source.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
“This analysis assumes that the hydrogen production process is electrolysis, thought to be the most environmentally friendly method.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The generation approach assumes localised generation and minimal transmission and distribution losses.
“This will reduce supply inefficiencies and was the assumed generation approach used in the methodology, assuming localised generation and minimal transmission and distribution losses.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Most HBs and EBs will be fuelled during the early hours of the morning.
“It is assumed that most HBs and EBs will be fuelled during the early hours of the morning, therefore there will be an increased peak in network energy demand which may require energy storage to ensure network stability.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
All electric modes of transport are electric from 2017.
“Results do not take into consideration life cycle emissions and assume that all electric modes of transport are electric from 2017, therefore although”
The paper relies on this without support.
Technology is not currently in place for 100% renewable electricity generation.
“As technology currently isn't in place for 100% renewable electricity generation”
The paper relies on this without support.
Gas generation will be required as dispatchable power.
“gas generation will be required as dispatchable power”
The paper relies on this without support.
CCS will help to mitigate some of the emissions produced from fossil electricity generation that provide dispatchable power when renewable generation is low.
“CCS will help to mitigate some of the emissions produced from fossil electricity generation that provide dispatchable power when renewable generation is low.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Conclusion ranks EV emissions above all bus types
MajorThe conclusion says EVs emit more per person than all bus types at 50% capacity. Table 6 puts EVs below CFBs in both years and below HBs in 2050 at 100% capacity; changing each vehicle to 50% capacity doubles each per-person value and preserves those rankings.
“Emissions at 50% capacity demonstrate that CFVs produce the highest level of emissions in gCO 2 km -1 per person, followed by EVs, then all bus types”
“Electric Vehicle 15.0 1.1 Conventionally Fuelled Bus 16.3 14.2 Hydrogen Bus 12.9 1.6 Electric Bus 5.3 0.4”
Abstract gives 2017 emissions-per-person values as 2050 results
MinorThe abstract assigns 30 and 16.3 gCO 2 km -1 per person to CFVs and CFBs in 2050. Table 6 lists those as their 2017 values; its 2050 values are 21.8 and 14.2, respectively.
“Results indicated that CFVs produced 30 gCO 2 km -1 per person compared to 16.3 gCO 2 km -1 per person by CFBs by 2050.”
“Conventionally Fuelled Vehicle 30.0 21.8 Electric Vehicle 15.0 1.1 Conventionally Fuelled Bus 16.3 14.2”
CFV emissions are said to peak in 2020 despite a higher 2017 value
MinorTable 3 gives CFV emissions as 41.8 MtCO 2 in 2017 and 41.5 MtCO 2 in 2020, so 2020 cannot be their peak over the reported period.
“Emissions for CFVs are expected to peak in 2020 to 41.5 MtCO 2 before decreasing by 7.3 MtCO 2 below 2017 levels.”
“2 ) 2020 (MtCO | 7.57 | 41.5 | | 2 ) 2017 (MtCO | 7.52 | 41.8 |”
Cites
Hosseini, S. E., & Wahid, M. A. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.112 · Cited by 2,443 · see citing works
Going green to be seen: status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation
Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., & Van den Bergh, B. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017346 · Cited by 2,174 · see citing works
Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: A qualitative study
Beirão, G., & Cabral, J. A. S. (2007) · Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.04.009 · Cited by 1,215 · see citing works
Comparative study of different fuel cell technologies
Mekhilef, S., Saidur, R., & Safari, A. (2011) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2011.09.020 · Cited by 1,070 · see citing works
Smart Energy Systems for coherent 100% renewable energy and transport solutions
Mathiesen, B. V., Lund, H., Connolly, D., Wenzel, H., Østergaard, P. A., Möller, B., Nielsen, S., Ridjan, I., Karnøe, P., Sperling, K., et al. (2015) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.075 · Cited by 1,067 · see citing works
Quality attributes of public transport that attract car users: A research review
Redman, L., Friman, M., Gärling, T., & Hartig, T. (2012) · Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.11.005 · Cited by 840 · see citing works
Sheller, M. (2004) · Theory Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0263276404046068 · Cited by 767 · see citing works
Life cycle assessment of a lithium-ion battery vehicle pack
Ellingsen, L. A., Majeau‐Bettez, G., Singh, B., Srivastava, A. K., Valøen, L. O., & Strømman, A. H. (2014) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12072 · Cited by 665 · see citing works
Offer, G. J., Howey, D. A., Contestabile, M., Clague, R., & Brandon, N. P. (2009) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.040 · Cited by 594 · see citing works
Hydrogen Production Technologies: Current State and Future Developments
Kalamaras, C. M., & Efstathiou, A. M. (2013) · Conference Papers in Energy · doi:10.1155/2013/690627 · Cited by 541 · see citing works
Hydrogen production with CO2 capture
Voldsund, M., Jordal, K., & Anantharaman, R. (2016) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.01.009 · Cited by 492 · see citing works
Eriksson, E. L. V., & Gray, E. M. (2017) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.132 · Cited by 448 · see citing works
Lajunen, A., & Lipman, T. (2016) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.075 · Cited by 400 · see citing works
Electric buses: A review of alternative powertrains
Mahmoud, M., Garnett, R., Ferguson, M., & Kanaroglou, P. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.019 · Cited by 341 · see citing works
Mobility, accessibility and quality of later life
Musselwhite, C., & Haddad, H. (2010) · Quality in Ageing and Older Adults · doi:10.5042/qiaoa.2010.0153 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
Feng, W., & Figliozzi, M. (2013) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2012.06.007 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Ellaway, A., MacIntyre, S., Hiscock, R., & Kearns, A. (2003) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/s1369-8478(03)00027-5 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Environmental impact assessment and comparison of some hydrogen production options
Suleman, F., Dincer, I., & Agelin-Chaab, M. (2015) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.03.123 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Comparison of Lifecycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Various Electricity Generation Sources
Berg, B. (2010) · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Ritter, J. A., & Ebner, A. D. (2007) · Separation Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/01496390701242194 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Roche, M. Y., Mourato, S., Fischedick, M., Pietzner, K., & Viebahn, P. (2009) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.03.029 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Yergin, D. (1988) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20043677 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Mobilities: New Perspectives on Transport and Society
Urry, J. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315595733 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Pietzcker (2014) · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2013.08.059 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Analysing awareness and acceptability of hydrogen vehicles: A London case study
O’Garra, T., Mourato, S., & Pearson, P. J. G. (2004) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2004.10.008 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Fernández-Dacosta, C., Shen, L., Schakel, W. B., Ramírez, A., & Kramer, G. J. (2018) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.055 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
The hydrogen economy, fuel cells, and electric cars
Shinnar, R. (2003) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2003.09.024 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Mohammadfam, I., & Zarei, E. (2015) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.07.117 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Green, J., Jones, A. J. H., & Roberts, H. M. (2012) · Ageing and Society · doi:10.1017/s0144686x12001110 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Road to zero or road to nowhere? Disrupting transport and energy in a zero carbon world
Brand, C., Anable, J., Ketsopoulou, I., & Watson, J. (2020) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111334 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Bögel, P. M., Oltra, C., Sala, R., Lores, M., Upham, P., Dütschke, E., Schneider, U., & Wiemann, P. F. V. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.266 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Vepsäläinen, J., Otto, K., Lajunen, A., & Tammi, K. (2018) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.064 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Lipman, T. E., Elke, M., & Lidicker, J. R. (2018) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.04.172 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Correa, G., Muñoz, P., Falaguerra, T., & Rodriguez, C. R. (2017) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2017.09.066 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Alcalde, J., Heinemann, N., Mabon, L., Worden, R. H., de Coninck, H., Robertson, H., Maver, M., Ghanbari, S., Swennenhuis, F., Mann, I., et al. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.087 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Self-Presentational Barriers to Resource Conservation
Sadalla, E. K., & Krull, J. L. (1995) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916595273004 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Transport Statistics Great Britain: 2006 Edition
Gul, T., Sayed, A., Scully, J., & Weekes, S. (2006) · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Goodman, A., Jones, A. J. H., Roberts, H. M., Steinbach, R., & Green, J. (2013) · Mobilities · doi:10.1080/17450101.2013.782848 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Life cycle assessment of H2 generation with high temperature electrolysis
Patyk, A., Bachmann, T. M., & Brisse, A. (2013) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.063 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Developing an optimal electricity generation mix for the UK 2050 future
Sithole, H., Cockerill, T. T., Hughes, K. J., Ingham, D. B., Ma, L., Porter, R. T. J., & Pourkashanian, M. (2016) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2016.01.077 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
An ideal journey: making bus travel desirable
Clayton, W., Jain, J., & Parkhurst, G. P. (2016) · Mobilities · doi:10.1080/17450101.2016.1156424 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Southall, G. D., & Khare, A. (2016) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2016.05.009 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
‘Decarbonising’ UK industry: towards a cleaner economy
Cooper, S., & Hammond, G. P. (2018) · Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Energy · doi:10.1680/jener.18.00007 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Kriston, A., Szabó, T., & Inzelt, G. (2010) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.08.110 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
The role of advertising and the car
Stokes, G., & Hallett, S. (1992) · Transport Reviews · doi:10.1080/01441649208716812 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Bellaby, P., Upham, P., Flynn, R., & Ricci, M. (2016) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.03.024 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Ogden, J. M., Kreutz, T. G., & Steinbugler, M. M. (2000) · Fuel Cells Bulletin · doi:10.1016/s1464-2859(00)86613-4 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Emonts, B., Schiebahn, S., Görner, K., Lindenberger, D., Markewitz, P., Merten, F., & Stolten, D. (2016) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.12.073 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Fuel cells, hydrogen and energy supply in Australia
Dicks, A. L., Diniz da Costa, J. C., Simpson, A., & McLellan, B. (2004) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.11.079 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Mahmood, M., Bashar, M. A., & Akhter, S. (2009) · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Energy and material flow models of hydrogen production in the U.S. Chemical Industry
Ozalp, N. (2008) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.05.094 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
What is the Value of CCS in the Future Energy System?
Heuberger, C. F., Staffell, I., Shah, N., & Dowell, N. M. (2017) · Energy Procedia · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1888 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Lajunen, A. (2018) · International Conference on Ecological Vehicles and Renewable Energies (EVER) · doi:10.1109/ever.2018.8362390 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Habitus and the loser cruiser: How low status deters bus use in a geographically limited field
Fitt, H. (2018) · Journal of Transport Geography · doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.06.011 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Miller, D. (2020) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003084860-1 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
A comparison of energy vectors in powering hybrid buses
Charters, D. (2016) · Renewable energy focus · doi:10.1016/j.ref.2016.02.011 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Aberdeen gets green light for Scottish hydrogen hub
(2012) · Fuel Cells Bulletin · doi:10.1016/s1464-2859(12)70270-5 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Brand, C., Anable, J., 2019. ‘Disruption’ and ‘continuity’ in transport energy systems : the case of the ban on new conventional fossil fuel vehicles, in: Eceee 2019 Summer Study. Giens, near Hyeres, France, pp. 1–12.
- Graurs, 2015, Public bus energy consumption investigation for transition to electric power and semi-dynamic charging, Eng. Rural Dev., 14, 366
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Griffiths, S., Sovacool, B. K., Kim, J., Bazilian, M., & Uratani, J. M. (2021) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.102208 · Cited by 602 · see citing works
Bie, Y., Ji, J., Wang, X., & Qu, X. (2021) · Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering · doi:10.1111/mice.12684 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Renewable hydrogen supply chains: A planning matrix and an agenda for future research
Sgarbossa, F., Arena, S., Tang, O., & Peron, M. (2022) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108674 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
The status of hydrogen technologies in the UK: A multi-disciplinary review
Edwards, R., Font-Palma, C., & Howe, J. (2020) · Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments · doi:10.1016/j.seta.2020.100901 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Optimal charging strategy for large-scale electric buses considering resource constraints
Liu, K., Gao, H., Liang, Z., Zhao, M., & Li, C. (2021) · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2021.103009 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Zore, U. K., Yedire, S. G., Pandi, N., Manickam, S., & Sonawane, S. H. (2021) · Ultrasonics Sonochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105536 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
A review of transportation carbon emissions research using bibliometric analyses
Fan, J., Meng, X., Tian, J., Xing, C., Wang, C., & Wood, J. (2023) · Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition) · doi:10.1016/j.jtte.2023.09.002 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Comparative assessment of zero emission electric and hydrogen buses in Australia
Hensher, D. A., Wei, E., & Balbontín, C. (2021) · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2021.103130 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Energy consumption and battery sizing for different types of electric bus service
Basma, H., Mansour, C., Haddad, M., Nemer, M., & Stabat, P. (2021) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.122454 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Explosion of high pressure hydrogen tank in fire: Mechanism, criterion, and consequence assessment
Wang, X., Li, B., Han, B., Jin, X., Zhang, D., & Bi, M. (2023) · Journal of Energy Storage · doi:10.1016/j.est.2023.108455 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Electric and hydrogen rail: Potential contribution to net zero in the UK
Logan, K. G., Nelson, J. D., McLellan, B. C., & Hastings, A. (2020) · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2020.102523 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Self-citationConceptual framework for balancing society and nature in net-zero energy transitions
Delafield, G., Donnison, C. L., Roddis, P., Arvanitopoulos, T., Sfyridis, A., Dunnett, S., Ball, T., & Logan, K. G. (2021) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2021.08.021 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Self-citationDixon, J., Bukhsh, W., Bell, K. R. W., & Brand, C. (2022) · eTransportation · doi:10.1016/j.etran.2022.100180 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Yazdi, M., Moradi, R., Pirbalouti, R. G., Zarei, E., & Li, H. (2023) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr11092730 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Optimal charging plan for electric bus considering time-of-day electricity tariff
Liu, Y., Wang, L., Zeng, Z., & Bie, Y. (2022) · Journal of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles · doi:10.1108/jicv-04-2022-0008 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Foda, A., Abdelaty, H., Mohamed, M., & El-Saadany, E. F. (2023) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2023.127592 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
The Economic Effects of Electromobility in Sustainable Urban Public Transport
Pietrzak, O., & Pietrzak, K. (2021) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en14040878 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Coppitters, D., Verleysen, K., Paepe, W. D., & Contino, F. (2022) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118694 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Wenz, K.-P., Serrano‐Guerrero, X., Barragán-Escandón, A., González, L. G., & Clairand, J. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111215 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
UK and China: Will electric vehicle integration meet Paris Agreement Targets?
Logan, K. G., Nelson, J. D., Lu, X., & Hastings, A. (2020) · Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives · doi:10.1016/j.trip.2020.100245 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationLogan, K. G., Nelson, J. D., Brand, C., & Hastings, A. (2021) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2021.08.001 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationState of Climate Action 2021: Systems Transformations Required to Limit Global Warming to 1.5°C
Boehm, S., Lebling, K., Levin, K., Fekete, H., Jaeger, J., Waite, R., Nilsson, A. E., Thwaites, J., Wilson, R., Geiges, A., et al. (2021) · doi:10.46830/wrirpt.21.00048 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
The application of travel demand management initiatives within a university setting
Logan, K. G., Nelson, J. D., Osbeck, C., Chapman, J. D., & Hastings, A. (2020) · Case Studies on Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/j.cstp.2020.10.007 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Self-citationSoukhov, A., & Mohamed, M. (2021) · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2021.103127 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Charging strategy selection for electric bus systems: A multi-criteria decision-making approach
Sadrani, M., Najafi, A., Mirqasemi, R., & Antoniou, C. (2023) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121415 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Time for hydrogen buses? Dynamic analysis of the Hong Kong bus market
Wang, Z., Yu, J., Li, G., Zhuge, C., & Chen, A. (2023) · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2022.103602 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Ku, A. Y., de Souza, A., McRobie, J., Li, J. X., & Levin, J. (2021) · Clean Energy · doi:10.1093/ce/zkab029 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from U.S. Light-Duty Transport in Line with the 2 °C Target
Zhu, Y., Skerlos, S. J., Xu, M., & Cooper, D. (2021) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c00816 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Environmental and energy performance of integrated passenger–freight transport
Bruzzone, F., Cavallaro, F., & Nocera, S. (2023) · Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives · doi:10.1016/j.trip.2023.100958 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Li, H., Yazdi, M., Moradi, R., Pirbalouti, R. G., & Nedjati, A. (2023) · Fire · doi:10.3390/fire6100391 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Japan and the UK: Emission predictions of electric and hydrogen trains to 2050
Logan, K. G., Nelson, J. D., McLellan, B. C., & Hastings, A. (2021) · Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives · doi:10.1016/j.trip.2021.100344 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citationSubsidy policies towards zero-emission bus fleets: A systematic technical-economic analysis
Wang, Z., Yu, J., Chen, A., & Fu, X. (2024) · Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.02.022 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
The case for negotiated contracts under the transition to a green bus fleet
Hensher, D. A. (2021) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2021.10.006 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Ulahannan, A., & Birrell, S. A. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14105952 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Predicting energy consumption of zero emission buses using route feature selection methods
Blades, L. A. W., Matthews, T., McGrath, T., Early, J. M., Cunningham, G., & Harris, A. (2024) · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2024.104158 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
A systematic review of urban road traffic CO 2 emission models
Yu, C., Yang, X., Mu, J., & Liu, S. (2025) · Carbon Footprints · doi:10.20517/cf.2025.12 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Estrada, A., Balest, J., Zubaryeva, A., & Sparber, W. (2023) · Journal of Energy Storage · doi:10.1016/j.est.2023.108411 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Fredershausen, S., Lechte, H., Willnat, M., Witt, T., Harnischmacher, C., Lembcke, T.-B., Klumpp, M., & Kolbe, L. M. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su132111652 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Stecuła, K., Olczak, P., Kamiński, P., Matuszewska, D., & Duc, H. D. (2022) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en15249456 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Zacharof, N., Özener, O., Broekaert, S., Özkan, M., Samaras, Z. C., & Fontaras, G. (2023) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2023.127155 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Synthetic Fuels in a Transport Transition: Fuels to Prevent a Transport Underclass
Styring, P., Duckworth, E. L., & Platt, E. G. (2021) · Frontiers in Energy Research · doi:10.3389/fenrg.2021.707867 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Zhang, M., & Yang, M. (2024) · Transportation Letters · doi:10.1080/19427867.2024.2363659 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Antecedents in rural residents' acceptance of autonomous vehicles
Wang, N., Tang, H., Wang, Y.-J., & Huang, G. Q. (2024) · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2024.104244 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Low emission vehicle integration: Will National Grid electricity generation mix meet UK net zero?
Logan, K. G., Nelson, J. D., & Hastings, A. (2021) · Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part A Journal of Power and Energy · doi:10.1177/09576509211015472 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citationReprint of: Renewable hydrogen supply chains: A planning matrix and an agenda for future research
Sgarbossa, F., Arena, S., Tang, O., & Peron, M. (2022) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108712 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Meng, L., Li, M., & Asuka, J. (2024) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ad3566 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Moura, C. H. S., Silveira, J. L., & Lamas, W. D. Q. (2020) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.08.198 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Examining energy uncertainty in battery bus deployments for transit agencies in California
Benoliel, P. K., Jenn, A. T., & Tal, G. (2021) · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2021.102963 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Guzik, R., Kołoś, A., Taczanowski, J., Fiedeń, Ł., Gwosdz, K., Hetmańczyk, K., & Łodziński, J. (2021) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en14227751 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Decarbonising UK transport: Implications for electricity generation, land use and policy
Logan, K. G., Nelson, J. D., Chapman, J. D., Milne, J., & Hastings, A. (2022) · Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives · doi:10.1016/j.trip.2022.100736 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationPeng, Y., Li, G., Xu, M., & Chen, A. (2024) · Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2024.103630 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Aboud, M. F. A., ALOthman, Z. A., & Bagabas, A. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11146604 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“Door-to-door” carbon emission calculation for airlines – Its decarbonization potential and impact
Li, D., & Merkert, R. (2023) · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2023.103849 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Reithuber, P., Weller, K., Schutting, E., & Eichlseder, H. (2024) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.11.460 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Electric bus scheduling with the self-adaptive charging strategy based on a course selection idea
Zheng, H., Sun, H., Kang, L., Wu, J., & Guo, X. H. (2023) · Transportmetrica A Transport Science · doi:10.1080/23249935.2023.2170719 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
The impact of E-bus satisfaction on driving behaviour: A questionnaire-based study on E-bus drivers
Jiang, K., Shao, C., Feng, Z., Yue, Q., Yu, Z., Zhu, S., & Huang, Z. (2021) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2021.10.007 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Optimization of Electric Bus Scheduling Considering Charging Station Resource Constraints
Zhang, M., Yang, M., Li, Y., & Huang, S. (2023) · Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.1177/03611981231178307 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Future use of natural gas under tightening climate targets
Dubey, L., Speirs, J. F., Balcombe, P., Tariq, N., Brandon, N. P., & Hawkes, A. D. (2023) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2023.103158 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Zhou, Y., Chen, S., & Chen, J. (2024) · IET Energy Systems Integration · doi:10.1049/esi2.12139 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Place-based sustainable urban mobility: a conceptual framework to spark local designs
Galanakis, K., Heinz, H., & Marggraf, C. (2024) · Regional Studies · doi:10.1080/00343404.2024.2406290 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Zheng, F., Wang, Z., Wang, Z., & Liu, M. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su151310728 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Kozlov, A. V., Porsin, A. V., Dobrovol’skii, Y. A., Kashin, A. M., Terenchenko, A. S., Gorin, M., Tikhonov, A. N., & Milov, K. V. (2021) · Russian Journal of Applied Chemistry · doi:10.1134/s1070427221060136 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Life Cycle Assessment of Hydrogen Fuel Cell Buses: A Systematic Review of Methodological Approaches
Padovan, C., Angelo, A. C. M., D’Agosto, M. D. A., & Carneiro, P. J. P. (2026) · Future Transportation · doi:10.3390/futuretransp6010023 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Beyond green or grey: hydrogen corridors and the future of decarbonized transport
Gasparetto, M., Cavallaro, F., Cherchi, E., & Nocera, S. (2026) · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2026.105269 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Saxena, A. (2023) · European Transport/Trasporti Europei · doi:10.48295/et.2023.92.6 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Shaw, A., Mander, S. L., Parkes, B., & Wood, F. R. (2023) · Frontiers in Energy Research · doi:10.3389/fenrg.2023.1268270 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Varghese, A. M., & Pradhan, R. P. (2025) · Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments · doi:10.1016/j.seta.2025.104218 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Filina-Dawidowicz, L., Sęk, J., Trojanowski, P., & Wiktorowska-Jasik, A. (2024) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en17143450 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Chinese, D., Pinamonti, P., & Mauro, C. (2021) · Optimization and Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11081-021-09642-y · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Sparber, W., Grotto, A., Zambelli, P., Vaccaro, R., & Zubaryeva, A. (2023) · World Electric Vehicle Journal · doi:10.3390/wevj14040091 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Alturif, G., & Saleh, W. S. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15118942 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Lidynia, C., Liehner, G. L., & Ziefle, M. (2021) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-80012-3_41 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Topal, O. (2023) · CT&F - Ciencia Tecnología y Futuro · doi:10.29047/01225383.654 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Puglia, M., Morselli, N., Cossu, M., Pedrazzi, S., Allesina, G., & Muscio, A. (2024) · Applied Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.124053 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Hydrogen in the Portuguese Navy: A case study
Santos, N. P. (2022) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.06.180 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Arun, D. A. Y. A., & Nesaraj, A. S. (2023) · Journal of Metals Materials and Minerals · doi:10.55713/jmmm.v33i4.1775 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
On the dual-resource overnight charging problem of battery electric buses
Wang, Z., Zheng, F., Hamdan, S., & Jouini, O. (2025) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125924 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Chakraborty, A., Islam, M., Shahriyar, F., Uddin, M. M., Uddin, M. H., & Minar, M. R. (2023) · International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT) · doi:10.1109/icccnt56998.2023.10307607 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Kasser, A., Loret, E. L. C., Meunier, G., Ponssard, J., & Zarea, M. F. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140743 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Batóg, J., Batóg, B., Mojsiewicz, M., & Pluskota, P. (2024) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en17236140 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Human mobility and energy: How do human mobility and energy affect urban policy and planning?
Dorostkar, E., Najarsadeghi, M., Molavi, M., & Zali, N. (2023) · Journal of Urban Management · doi:10.1016/j.jum.2023.08.001 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Location and Volume Determination of Hydrogen Refueling Stations Based on Oligopoly Equilibrium
Huang, Y., Lixia, T., Zhao, H., Sun, S., Deng, J., & Liu, S. (2021) · International Journal of Heat and Technology · doi:10.18280/ijht.390110 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Barzegari, V., & Nourinejad, M. (2025) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2025.139181 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Hydrogen-based trains, trucks, and buses: techno-socio-economic challenges and perspective
Dadashzadeh, N., Dadashzadeh, S., & Qadir, A. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-34013-0.00011-6 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Worldwide review of hydrogen fuel cell buses: Status, opportunities, and challenges
Wang, Z., Chen, A., & Zhuge, C. (2026) · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2026.105299 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Janairo, A. G., Concepcion, R., Fernando, A., & Guillermo, M. A. (2026) · Urban Science · doi:10.3390/urbansci10070380 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Expected environmental implications of hydrogen fuel cell buses in Australia
Hassouna, F. M. A., & Pringle, I. (2024) · International Journal of Sustainable Engineering · doi:10.1080/19397038.2024.2432969 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Modelling transport emission of an out of town centre to achieve emission reduction targets
Malik, F. A., Bell, M. C., Dala, L., & Busawon, K. (2021) · International Symposium on Environment-Friendly Energies and Applications (EFEA) · doi:10.1109/efea49713.2021.9406268 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Toxic Emission During Road Tests of Urban Bus
Magryta, P., Grabowski, Ł., Baranski, G., & Wendeker, M. (2023) · Advances in Science and Technology – Research Journal · doi:10.12913/22998624/172413 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Koc, A., & Seçkiner, S. U. (2026) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2026.153635 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Samiullah, M., Tahir, H., Al-Awami, A. T., & Ferik, S. E. (2026) · Results in Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2026.110282 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Embracing Pure Electric Buses: Vision, Risks and Challenges
Tang, J., Meng, G., Hu, C., & Wang, Y. (2024) · Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies · doi:10.61173/f53kx315 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Selim, A., Vahedi, S., Subedi, S., & Zhao, J. (2024) · Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON) · doi:10.1109/iecon55916.2024.10905691 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Varhegyi, G., & Nour, M. (2026) · Energy Reports · doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2026.109497 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
O'Boyle, C., Blades, L. A. W., McGrath, T., Early, J. M., & Harris, A. (2024) · SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · doi:10.4271/2024-01-2176 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Blades, L. A. W., McGrath, T., Early, J. M., & Harris, A. (2025) · Lecture notes in mobility · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-89444-2_21 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Vassarodkit, S., Kayee, P., Toraninpanich, S., Sittisom, P., Poolsawat, K., Wongsapai, W., Achariyaviriya, W., & Suttakul, P. (2026) · Journal of Energy Systems · doi:10.30521/jes.1761879 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Comparative energy consumption analysis of electric and hydrogen buses using real-world data
Zhao, X., Jin, Z., Gu, W., Fan, W., & Xie, C. (2026) · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2026.105516 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Kim, D. H., Kim, J. H., & Lee, M. J. (2026) · Energy Reports · doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2026.109092 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Demiris, A., Fountas, G., Fonzone, A., & Basbas, S. (2026) · Transportation research procedia · doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2026.02.104 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Logan, K. G., Nelson, J. D., & Hastings, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Aberdeen (GB)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Logan, Kathryn G.
- Venue
- Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-08
- Volume
- 85
- Pages
- 102350
- ISSN
- 1361-9209 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3026983565
- Semantic Scholar
- 762f0107480878e1a27bbd87b9f26fde9678a518
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 5
- FWCI
- 6.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Environment Research Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Vehicle emissions and performance
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
- Keywords
- electric buses, hydrogen buses, CO2 emissions, modal shift, vehicle capacity, net-zero emissions, electric vehicles, UK transport policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-06.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-06.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review