Cited by 123Electric Vehicles and InfrastructureVehicle emissions and performanceElectric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies

Electric and hydrogen buses: Shifting from conventionally fuelled cars in the UK

Open access
Logan, Kathryn G., Nelson, John D., Hastings, Astley·2020·Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment

Abstract

For the UK to meet their national target of net zero emissions as part of the central Paris Agreement target, further emphasis needs to be placed on decarbonizing public transport and moving away from personal transport (conventionally fuelled vehicles (CFVs) and electric vehicles (EVs)). Electric buses (EBs) and hydrogen buses (HBs) have the potential to fulfil requirements if powered from low carbon renewable energy sources. A comparison of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions produced from conventionally fuelled buses (CFB), EBs and HBs between 2017 and 2050 under four National Grid electricity scenarios was conducted. In addition, emissions per person at different vehicle capacity levels (100%, 75%, 50% and 25%) were projected for CFBs, HBs, EBs and personal transport assuming a maximum of 80 passengers per bus and four per personal vehicle. Results indicated that CFVs produced 30 gCO2 km−1 per person compared to 16.3 gCO2 km−1 per person by CFBs by 2050. At 100% capacity, under the two-degree scenario, CFB emissions were 36 times higher than EBs, 9 times higher than HBs and 12 times higher than EVs in 2050. Cumulative emissions under all electricity scenarios remained lower for EBs and HBs. Policy makers need to focus on encouraging a modal shift from personal transport towards sustainable public transport, primarily EBs as the lowest level emitting vehicle type. Simple electrification of personal vehicles will not meet the required targets. Simultaneously, CFBs need to be replaced with EBs and HBs if the UK is going to meet emission targets.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This paper projects UK CO₂ emissions from conventionally fuelled buses (CFBs), electric buses (EBs), and hydrogen buses (HBs) from 2017 to 2050 under four National Grid electricity scenarios, comparing them with conventionally fuelled vehicles (CFVs) and electric vehicles (EVs). It concludes that EBs produce the lowest operating emissions per person and that a modal shift from personal vehicles to sustainable public transport is needed for the UK to meet net-zero targets.

Key findings

  • At 100% capacity under the two-degree scenario, 2050 CFB emissions were 36 times higher than EBs, 9 times higher than HBs, and 12 times higher than EVs.
  • At 100% capacity, CFVs produced 30.0 gCO₂ km⁻¹ per person in 2017 and 21.8 in 2050, while CFBs produced 16.3 in 2017 and 14.2 in 2050; EBs produced 5.3 in 2017 and 0.4 in 2050, and HBs 12.9 in 2017 and 1.6 in 2050.
  • Under the two-degree scenario, EBs emitted 3.2 gCO₂ km⁻¹ per person at 100% capacity versus 7.8 for HBs; at 25% capacity, EBs emitted 12.8 versus 31.2 for HBs.
  • Cumulative 2017–2050 emissions under the two-degree scenario were 19.8 MtCO₂ for EBs, 48.1 MtCO₂ for HBs, 169.4 MtCO₂ for EVs, 258.3 MtCO₂ for CFBs, and 1315.7 MtCO₂ for CFVs.

Methods

  • The study projected CO₂ emissions from CFBs, EBs, and HBs between 2017 and 2050 under four UK National Grid electricity scenarios: two-degree, steady progression, community renewables, and consumer evolution.
  • It used UK Government and National Grid data plus the TEAM-UK model for bus numbers and distance travelled, and calculated emissions per person at 100%, 75%, 50%, and 25% vehicle capacity assuming 80 passengers per bus and four per personal vehicle.
  • EB modelling used 1.2 kWh km⁻¹ and an inefficiency factor of 1.18; HB modelling used 1.8 kWh km⁻¹, electrolysis inefficiency of 1.72, and a fuel-cell conversion factor of 1.25; SMR and coal gasification with and without CCS were analysed for 2018 only.

Limitations

  • The paper states it does not directly consider embedded carbon costs of vehicles, including decommissioning CFVs and constructing new vehicles, and that SMR/coal gasification could only be analysed for 2018 due to data certainty limitations.
  • The paper states EB energy consumption and conversion factors were kept constant through 2050, so EB emissions may be overestimated, and hydrogen estimates do not include life-cycle emissions from the generation source.
  • The text makes evident that the model is simple and assumes all electric modes are electric from 2017, that cars are at full capacity in some comparisons despite average CFV occupancy of 1.6, and that costs, infrastructure, and behavioural drivers of modal shift are discussed but not fully modelled.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102350

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

1 of 32 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged

  • Premisecitation

    If HBs and EBs are fuelled from renewables, they could be especially advantageous within city centres where there is typically heavy traffic and poor air quality due to emissions from CFVs and CFBs.

    “If HB and EBs are fuelled from renewables, they could be especially advantageous within city centres where there is typically heavy traffic and as a result air quality can be poor due to emissions from CFVs and CFBs (Correa et al., 2017;Lajunen and Lipman, 2016;Lajunen and Tammi, 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Correa et al., 2017 source
    • cites Lajunen and Lipman, 2016 source
    • cites Lajunen and Tammi, 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Findingown data

    Cumulative emissions under all electricity scenarios remained lower for EBs and HBs.

    “Cumulative emissions under all electricity scenarios remained lower for EBs and HBs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    CFVs produced 30 gCO2 km-1 per person compared to 16.3 gCO2 km-1 per person by CFBs by 2050.

    “Results indicated that CFVs produced 30 gCO 2 km -1 per person compared to 16.3 gCO 2 km -1 per person by CFBs by 2050.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    At 50% CFB capacity, emissions per person are approximately equal to 100% capacity CFV usage (32.6 vs 30 gCO2 km-1 per person).

    “However, as soon as public transport use (i.e.CFBs) increases to 50% then this is approximately equal to 100% capacity CFV usage (32.6 gCO 2 km -1 and 30 gCO 2 km -1 respectively).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    At 100% capacity under the two-degree scenario, CFB emissions were 9 times higher than HBs in 2050.

    “At 100% capacity, under the two-degree scenario, CFB emissions were 36 times higher than EBs, 9 times higher than HBs and 12 times higher than EVs in 2050.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 45
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 16
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    At 50% capacity, CFB emissions are 32.5 gCO2 km-1 per person in 2017 and 28.5 gCO2 km-1 per person in 2050.

    “However, at 50% capacity, emissions from a CFB would almost half that of CFVs at 32.5 gCO 2 km -1 per person in 2017.However due to minimal technological advances if a CFB was at 50% capacity in 2050, emissions would be expected to be 28.5 gCO 2 km -1 per person.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    CFB emissions are projected to peak in 2030 and by 2050 be 0.02 MtCO2 higher than in 2017.

    “Emissions for CFBs are expected to peak in 2030 before decreasing, however by 2050, emissions are expected to be 0.02 MtCO 2 higher than in 2017.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    A standard four-person car at 100% capacity produced 30 gCO2 km-1 per person in 2017 and could decrease to 21.7 gCO2 km-1 per person by 2050.

    “Fig. 1 demonstrates that a standard four-person car produced 30 gCO 2 km -1 per person at 100% capacity in 2017.Due to technological advances, emissions per person could decrease to 21.7 gCO 2 km -1 per person by 2050.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingreasoning

    At the average CFV occupancy rate of 1.6 individuals per vehicle, carbon emissions per person are significantly more than for 25% capacity CFBs.

    “Carbon emissions for this CFV capacity are significantly more than that of 25% CFBs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    A bus at 25% capacity produces 65.2 gCO2 km-1 per person in 2017, decreasing to 56.9 gCO2 km-1 per person.

    “A bus at 25% capacity would produce 65.2 gCO 2 km -1 per person in 2017, decreasing to 56.9 gCO 2 km -1 per person.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Under the steady progression scenario, hydrogen bus emissions decrease by 78% over 2017-2050, with a secondary peak in 2030.

    “Under the steady progression scenario, emissions decreased by 78% over the studied period, though the decrease was not linear and contained a secondary peak in 2030.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    CFV emissions are projected to peak in 2020 at 41.5 MtCO2 and then decrease to 7.3 MtCO2 below 2017 levels.

    “Emissions for CFVs are expected to peak in 2020 to 41.5 MtCO 2 before decreasing by 7.3 MtCO 2 below 2017 levels.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingnone given

    A car at 25% capacity could produce 120 gCO2 km-1 per person in 2050, decreasing to 87 gCO2 km-1 per person by 2050.

    “Whereas a car could produce 120 gCO 2 km -1 per person in 2050, decreasing to 87 gCO 2 km -1 per person by 2050.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In 2017, CFVs produced 5 times more emissions than CFBs; by 2050, CFVs produced 4.5 times more emissions than CFBs.

    “Emission predictions indicate that in 2017, CFVs under both scenarios produced 5 times more emissions than CFBs.By 2050, emissions are 4.5 higher.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Under the two-degree scenario at 50% capacity in 2017, CFV emissions per person are almost double those of HBs and six times those of EBs.

    “Results indicate that under this scenario, the gCO 2 km -1 per person for CFVs at 50% capacity are almost double that of HBs and six times that of EBs in 2017.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Table 6 indicates that EVs produce less gCO2 km-1 per person than HBs in 2050.

    “Table 6 indicates that EVs produce less gCO 2 km -1 per person than HBs in 2050, this remains unlikely as 100% EVs by 2050 is not likely achievable.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    At 50% capacity, CFVs produce the highest level of emissions in gCO2 km-1 per person, followed by EVs, then all bus types.

    “Emissions at 50% capacity demonstrate that CFVs produce the highest level of emissions in gCO 2 km -1 per person, followed by EVs, then all bus types”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    At 50% capacity, hydrogen bus emissions are 15.6 gCO2 km-1 per person, while electric bus emissions are almost half at 6.4 gCO2 km-1 per person.

    “Under 50% capacity, emissions from HBs were 15.6 gCO 2 km -1 per person with emissions from EBs at almost half this level producing 6.4 gCO 2 km -1 per person.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    HBs use 1.8 kWh km-1, EBs use 1.2 kWh km-1, and EVs use 0.17 kWh km-1.

    “Through comparison of kWh km -1 , HBs use 1.8 kWh km -1 , EBs use 1.2 kWh km -1 , whereas EVs use 0.17 kWh km -1 .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The worst-case hydrogen bus scenario remains 5.7 MtCO2 lower than CFB production, with CFBs producing around four times more emissions in total in 2050.

    “The worst-case scenario remains 5.7 MtCO 2 lower than the CFB productions, with CFBs producing around four times more emissions in total in 2050.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Without CCS, hydrogen bus emissions using steam methane reforming are 11 times higher and using coal gasification are 19 times higher than with CCS.

    “Without CCS, emissions using steam methane reforming was 11 times higher and for coal gasification, emissions were 19 times higher.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Electrolysis using CCS would produce 15 gCO2 kWh-1 and result in emissions of 0.25 MtCO2 in 2018.

    “As a more advanced technology, electrolysis using CCS would produce 15 gCO 2 kWh -1 (CCC, 2018).This would result in emissions produced of 0.25 MtCO 2 in 2018.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites CCC, 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    By 2050, even with technological improvements, CFVs remain the highest emitting transport mode, producing 55 times more emissions than EBs and 14 times more than HBs.

    “By 2050, even with technological improvements CFVs remain the highest operating emitting transport mode producing 55 times more emission than EBs and 14 times more emission than HBs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Cumulative emissions of EVs are substantially higher than for both bus types, due to the higher number of EVs and distance travelled projected between 2017 and 2050.

    “Results indicate that the cumulative emissions of EVs are substantially higher than for both bus types which is due to the higher number of EVs and distance travelled projected between 2017 and 2050.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    At 75% capacity, hydrogen bus emissions are 10.4 gCO2 km-1 per person, while electric bus emissions are 4.3 gCO2 km-1 per person.

    “For 75% capacity, HB produced 10.4 gCO 2 km -1 per person, with EBs producing 4.3 gCO 2 km -1 per person.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    CFB emissions at 50% capacity remain relatively constant over the time frame and are almost half of CFV emissions in 2017.

    “CFB emissions remain relatively constant at 50% capacity within the time frame at almost half of CFV emissions in 2017.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    At 25% capacity, hydrogen bus emissions are 31.2 gCO2 km-1 per person, while electric bus emissions are almost three times lower at 12.8 gCO2 km-1 per person.

    “Results indicate that under the 25% capacity emissions from HBs are 31.2gCO 2 km -1 per person, whereas for EBs emissions are almost three times lower at 12.8 gCO 2 km -1 .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Under the consumer evolution scenario, hydrogen bus emissions decrease by 69%, with a secondary peak in 2031 at 3.5 MtCO2 before decreasing to 1.84 MtCO2.

    “The consumer evolution scenario saw the lowest decrease in emissions of 69%, with emission levels having a secondary peak in 2031 at 3.5 MtCO 2 before decreasing to 1.84 MtCO 2.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    This paper does not directly consider the embedded carbon costs of vehicles including the decommissioning of CFVs and the construction of vehicles.

    “This paper does not directly consider the embedded carbon costs of vehicles including the decommissioning of CFVs and the construction of vehicles.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    No single technology can make transportation carbon neutral.

    “Although no single technology can make transportation carbon neutral (Mathiesen et al., 2015), this paper will focus on the environmental operating emissions of EBs and HBs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mathiesen et al., 2015 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The UK is one of the best suitable locations for CCS implementation as there are suitable carbon sinks and appropriate offshore infrastructure.

    “Furthermore, the UK is one of the best suitable locations for CCS implementation as there are suitable carbon sinks (depleted oil and gas reservoirs and aquifers) with appropriate offshore infrastructure (BEIS, 2019d).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites BEIS, 2019d

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Approximately 99% of the H2 produced and consumed within industry is generated by natural gas reforming, producing high levels of CO2 as by-products.

    “Approximately 99% of the H 2 produced and consumed within industry is generated by natural gas reforming (Hosseini and Wahid, 2016;Mohammadfam and Zarei, 2015;Ozalp, 2008) producing high levels of CO 2 as by-products (National Academy of Engineering, 2004).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Hosseini and Wahid, 2016 source
    • cites Mohammadfam and Zarei, 2015 source
    • cites Ozalp, 2008 source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The projected increase in CFB emissions by 2050 relative to 2017 is due to a 19% increase in the number of buses and a 3% decrease in total distance travelled.

    “This is due to a 19% increase in the number of buses and 3% decrease in the total distance travelled.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Paris Agreement has set a target to limit global warming to less than 2°C above pre-industrial temperatures and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C above pre-industrial temperatures within this century.

    “The Paris Agreement has set a target to limit global warming to less than 2 °C above pre-industrial temperatures and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102350°C above pre-industrial temperatures within this century (Pietzcker et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pietzcker et al., 2014 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    EBs and HBs offer key advantages over CFBs and CFVs because they do not produce emissions directly from operation since their emissions are produced upstream.

    “Both EBs and HBs offer key advantages over conventionally fuelled buses (CFBs) and other conventionally fuelled vehicles (CFVs), as they do not produce emissions directly from operation since their emissions are produced upstream (Correa et al., 2017;Mekhilef et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Correa et al., 2017 source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

    • cites Mekhilef et al., 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    GHG emissions will need to reach optimum levels and decline as fast as possible to meet the Paris targets.

    “In addition, GHG emissions will need to reach optimum levels and decline as fast as possible to meet these targets (Pietzcker et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pietzcker et al., 2014 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    To use H2 for fuel, significant infrastructure improvements are needed as currently there are low numbers of H2 vehicles in use within the UK.

    “To use H 2 for fuel, significant infrastructure improvements are needed as currently there are low numbers of H 2 vehicles in use within the UK (Southall and Khare, 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Southall and Khare, 2016 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    SMR is one of the most widespread and least expensive methods of H2 generation.

    “SMR is one of the most widespread and least expensive methods of H 2 generation (Ogden et al., 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ogden et al., 2000 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Expanding and learning from policies in areas that have seen increases in public transport use, such as London, would further increase the emissions decrease seen across the country.

    “Expanding and learning from policies in areas that have seen increases in public transport use, such as London, would further increase the emissions decrease seen across the country.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    At least 20 CFVs could be taken off the road if buses were fully utilized, significantly reducing road transport emissions and congestion.

    “By assuming the maximum capacity of an average bus is 80 and a small CFV is four, as least 20 CFVs could be taken off the road if buses were fully utilized, significantly reducing road transport emissions and congestion.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    If increased use of public transport is achieved by 2050, there is a reduced need for the number of small EVs on the road, which can help decrease transport emissions and partially mitigate increases in power generation, congestion, safety and reduction of CFV and EV infrastructure.

    “If increased use of public transport is achieved by 2050 there is a reduced need for the number of small EVs on the road which can help decrease transport emissions as well as partially mitigate increases in power generation, congestion, safety and reduction of CFV and EV infrastructure.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    HBs use more electrical energy due to conversion and storage losses, and are expected to produce a higher level of operating emissions than battery powered EBs.

    “HBs use more electrical energy due to the energy required to convert electricity to H 2 and back to electricity with the potential for loss in storage; therefore, it is expected they will produce a higher level of operating emissions than battery powered EBs (Shinnar, 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shinnar, 2003 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The projected decrease in total CFV emissions is due to technological improvements and a 9% decrease in distance travelled despite a 25% increase in the number of vehicles between 2017 and 2050.

    “For CFVs, this decrease in total emissions is due to technological improvements, a decrease of 9% in the distance travelled despite a 25% increase in the number of vehicles between 2017 and 2050.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    To ensure consistency between the different fuel type models, the number of buses and distance travelled remained constant.

    “To ensure consistency between the different fuel type models, the number of buses and distance travelled remained constant (Appendix A).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The projected decrease in distance travelled by each bus is because distance projections are based upon the need to fulfil demand, which is estimated partly upon projected decrease in population size, resulting in a decrease in the need for public transport.

    “This is since distance projections are based upon the need to fulfil demand, which in turn is estimated partly based upon the projected decrease in population size, resulting in a decrease in the need for public transport.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The UK currently faces the 'chicken and egg problem' as although commercial H2 vehicles exist, future development is dependent upon widespread fuelling infrastructure to enable sales of H2 vehicles.

    “The UK currently faces the 'chicken and egg problem' as although commercial H 2 vehicles exist, future development is dependent upon the widespread fuelling infrastructure to enable sales of H 2 vehicles (Kriston et al., 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kriston et al., 2010 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationown data

    If the UK is to meet its emission targets, the travelling public need to move away from individual transport towards sustainable public transport.

    “Results from this study, particularly in Fig. 5, indicate that if the UK is to meet its emission targets, the travelling public need to move away from individual transport towards sustainable public transport.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    EBs are more suited to shorter routes within cities such as London.

    “Due to current technological advancements, EBs are more suited to shorter routes within cities such as London”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Without a modal shift towards public transport, the UK will be unlikely to meet its net zero emissions target.

    “Without a modal shift towards public transport, the UK will be unlikely to meet their net zero emissions target.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    If HBs are to be more widely utilised, then the preferred method of hydrogen generation would be electrolysis using renewable energy technologies.

    “If HBs are to be more widely utilised, then the preferred method of hydrogen generation would be electrolysis using renewable energy technologies”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Widespread utilisation of HBs or EBs will be required if the UK is going to meet national emission targets, because technological advances are not a strong enough mitigating factor for CFBs to meet targets and neither is a simple switch to personal EVs.

    “Results from the analysis presented in this paper indicate that widespread utilisation of HBs or EBs will be required if the UK is going to meet national emission targets, as technological advances are not a strong enough mitigating factor for CFBs to meet targets and neither is a simple switch to personal EVs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    If an HB has more than 10 passengers and an EB has more than 7, the bus has less emissions than a full electric car.

    “So, if an HB has more than 10 passengers and an EB has more than 7, the bus has less emissions than a full electric car.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The results do not take into consideration life cycle emissions and assume that all electric modes of transport are electric from 2017.

    “Results do not take into consideration life cycle emissions and assume that all electric modes of transport are electric from 2017, therefore although”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Bus operating costs per person are likely to be higher unless fares subsidies are implemented, which could result in fewer passengers.

    “Bus operating costs per person are likely to be higher, unless fares subsidies are implemented, which could result in fewer passengers.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    It is unlikely consumers will use the bus system more if faced with higher fares and cheaper unsustainable transport options.

    “To reduce total costs, more individuals will need to use the bus system, however it is unlikely consumers will do this if faced with higher fares and choose cheaper, unsustainable transport options.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    HBs have a larger range and may be suited to longer distances between cities and rural services.

    “where as HBs have a larger range and may be suited to longer distances between cities and rural services.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Hydrogen buses are less efficient than direct electric transport because H2 generation requires electricity to be converted to H2 and back again.

    “This is to be expected as H 2 generation requires electricity to be converted to H 2 and back again and will therefore be less efficient than direct electric transport.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The additional costs of HBs and EBs are due to electric mechanisms and above all lack of mass production.

    “The additional costs are due to the electric mechanisms, for example, the battery package, electric motor and auxiliary system, but above all lack of mass production (Feng and Figliozzi, 2013;Mahmoud et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Feng and Figliozzi, 2013 source
    • cites Mahmoud et al., 2016 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Without CCS implementation, the positive effects on dropping emissions from SMR would be dampened by the GHG emissions of SMR, furthering the likelihood of the UK missing its emissions targets of net zero.

    “without CCS implementation the positive effects on dropping emissions would be dampened by the GHG emissions of SMR, furthering the likelihood of the UK missing its emissions targets of net zero.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    HBs can be fuelled through electrolysis using excess renewable energy and with H2 generation from SMR using natural gas combined with CCS for low emissions.

    “HBs can be fuelled through electrolysis using excess renewable energy and with H 2 generation from SMR using natural gas combined with CCS for low emissions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Currently HBs cost around one million euros per bus, a standard EB costs 450,000 euros compared to a standard CFB of 250,000 euros.

    “Currently HBs cost around one million euros per bus, a standard EB costs 450,000 euros compared to a standard CFBs of 250,000 euros (Hydrogen Europe, 2017).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hydrogen Europe, 2017

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Both HBs and EBs are expected to produce significantly lower levels of emissions compared to CFBs by 2050, but this is dependent on the energy generation method.

    “Both HBs and EBs are expected to produce significantly lower levels of emissions compared to CFBs by 2050, however this is dependent on the energy generation method.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    CCS is required to reduce emissions as far as possible whilst infrastructure is being implemented to achieve complete decarbonisation of electricity generation.

    “As technology currently isn't in place for 100% renewable electricity generation and gas generation will be required as dispatchable power, CCS is required to reduce emissions as far as possible whilst infrastructure is being implemented to achieve complete decarbonisation of electricity generation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Technology is not currently in place for 100% renewable electricity generation.
    • Rests on an assumption: Gas generation will be required as dispatchable power.
    • Rests on an assumption: CCS will help to mitigate some of the emissions produced from fossil electricity generation that provide dispatchable power when renewable generation is low.
58 of 58
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The energy required during hydrogen generation is the same regardless of source.

    “It is assumed that the energy required during the hydrogen generation would be the same regardless of source.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The hydrogen production process is electrolysis.

    “This analysis assumes that the hydrogen production process is electrolysis, thought to be the most environmentally friendly method.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The generation approach assumes localised generation and minimal transmission and distribution losses.

    “This will reduce supply inefficiencies and was the assumed generation approach used in the methodology, assuming localised generation and minimal transmission and distribution losses.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Most HBs and EBs will be fuelled during the early hours of the morning.

    “It is assumed that most HBs and EBs will be fuelled during the early hours of the morning, therefore there will be an increased peak in network energy demand which may require energy storage to ensure network stability.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    All electric modes of transport are electric from 2017.

    “Results do not take into consideration life cycle emissions and assume that all electric modes of transport are electric from 2017, therefore although”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Technology is not currently in place for 100% renewable electricity generation.

    “As technology currently isn't in place for 100% renewable electricity generation”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Gas generation will be required as dispatchable power.

    “gas generation will be required as dispatchable power”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    CCS will help to mitigate some of the emissions produced from fossil electricity generation that provide dispatchable power when renewable generation is low.

    “CCS will help to mitigate some of the emissions produced from fossil electricity generation that provide dispatchable power when renewable generation is low.”
8 of 8

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Conclusion ranks EV emissions above all bus types

    Major

    The conclusion says EVs emit more per person than all bus types at 50% capacity. Table 6 puts EVs below CFBs in both years and below HBs in 2050 at 100% capacity; changing each vehicle to 50% capacity doubles each per-person value and preserves those rankings.

  • Abstract gives 2017 emissions-per-person values as 2050 results

    Minor

    The abstract assigns 30 and 16.3 gCO 2 km -1 per person to CFVs and CFBs in 2050. Table 6 lists those as their 2017 values; its 2050 values are 21.8 and 14.2, respectively.

  • CFV emissions are said to peak in 2020 despite a higher 2017 value

    Minor

    Table 3 gives CFV emissions as 41.8 MtCO 2 in 2017 and 41.5 MtCO 2 in 2020, so 2020 cannot be their peak over the reported period.

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Brand, C., Anable, J., 2019. ‘Disruption’ and ‘continuity’ in transport energy systems : the case of the ban on new conventional fossil fuel vehicles, in: Eceee 2019 Summer Study. Giens, near Hyeres, France, pp. 1–12.
  2. Graurs, 2015, Public bus energy consumption investigation for transition to electric power and semi-dynamic charging, Eng. Rural Dev., 14, 366

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Logan, K. G., Nelson, J. D., & Hastings, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Logan, Kathryn G.
Venue
Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
85
Pages
102350
ISSN
1361-9209 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3026983565
Cited by
123
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 5
FWCI
6.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Natural Environment Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Vehicle emissions and performance
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
Keywords
electric buses, hydrogen buses, CO2 emissions, modal shift, vehicle capacity, net-zero emissions, electric vehicles, UK transport policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-06.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-06.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review