Cited by 180Advanced Battery Technologies ResearchElectric and Hybrid Vehicle TechnologiesAdvancements in Battery Materials

SOC estimation of Li-ion battery using convolutional neural network with U-Net architecture

Fan, Xinyuan, Zhang, Weige, Zhang, Caiping, Chen, Anci, An, Fulai·2022·Energy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124612

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Fan, X., Zhang, W., Zhang, C., Chen, A., & An, F.
Affiliations
Beijing Jiaotong University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Weige
Venue
Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-10
Volume
256
Pages
124612
ISSN
0360-5442 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283385419
Cited by
180
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 10
FWCI
10.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Energy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51977007)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality (3212033)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
Keywords
state of charge estimation, lithium-ion batteries, U-Net, convolutional neural networks, edge effects, total variation loss, temperature variation, electric vehicles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review