Cited by 234Advanced Battery Technologies ResearchAdvancements in Battery MaterialsControl Systems and Identification

State-of-Charge Estimation of Lithium-Ion Batteries via Long Short-Term Memory Network

Open access
Yang, Fangfang, Song, Xiangbao, Xu, Fan, Tsui, Kwok-Leung·2019·IEEE Access

Abstract

Accurate state-of-charge (SOC) estimation is critical for driving range prediction of electric vehicles and optimal charge control of batteries. In this paper, a stacked long short-term memory network is proposed to model the complex dynamics of lithium iron phosphate batteries and infer battery SOC from current, voltage, and temperature measurements. The proposed network is trained and tested using data collected from the dynamic stress test, US06 test, and federal urban driving schedule. The performance on SOC estimation is evaluated regarding tracking accuracy, computation time, robustness against unknown initial states, and compared with results from the model-based filtering approach (unscented Kalman filter). Moreover, different training and testing data sets are constructed to test its robustness against varying loading profiles. The experimental results show that the proposed network well captures the nonlinear correlation between SOC and measurable signals and provides better tracking performance than the unscented Kalman filter. In case of inaccurate initial SOCs, the proposed network presents quick convergence to the true SOC, with root mean square errors within 2% and mean average errors within 1%. Moreover, the estimation time at each time step is sub-millisecond, making it appropriate for real-time applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2019.2912803

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, F., Song, X., Xu, F., & Tsui, K.-L.
Affiliations
  • City University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Googol Technology (China) (CN)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2019
Volume
7
Pages
53792-53799
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2941419825
Cited by
234
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 6
FWCI
11.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion)
  • CityU Scholars (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee (T32-101/15-R)
  • General Research Fund (CityU 11206417)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
Keywords
state of charge estimation, lithium-ion batteries, lithium iron phosphate batteries, long short-term memory networks, stacked LSTM, unscented Kalman filter, electric vehicles, driving range prediction, battery management systems, real-time estimation, dynamic stress test, driving cycles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review