Cited by 70Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling SystemsProcess Optimization and IntegrationSpacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies

Optimization and analysis of a hydrogen liquefaction process: Energy, exergy, economic, and uncertainty quantification analysis

Geng, Jinliang, Sun, Heng·2023·Energy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125410

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Geng, J., & Sun, H.
Affiliations
China University of Petroleum, Beijing (CN)
Corresponding author
Sun, Heng
Venue
Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-01
Volume
262
Pages
125410
ISSN
0360-5442 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4295881863
Cited by
70
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 1
FWCI
5.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Energy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Process Optimization and Integration
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
Keywords
hydrogen liquefaction, single mixed refrigerant cycle, specific energy consumption, exergy efficiency, uncertainty quantification, particle swarm optimization, process optimization, annualized cost, coefficient of performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review