The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Public acceptance for environmental taxes: Self-interest, environmental and distributional concerns
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior
Stern, P. C. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00175 · Cited by 8,682
Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation
Train, K. E. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805271 · Cited by 7,784
Value orientations, gender and environmental concern
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916593255002 · Cited by 2,162 · cited 3×
“Three important exceptions are the papers by Stern et al. (1993), Rienstra et al. (1999) and Schade and Schlag (2003): Stern et al. (1993) provides a widely used theoretical foundation for explaining proenvironmental behaviour.”
BackgroundCultural cognition of scientific consensus.
Kahan, D. M., Jenkins‐Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2011) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2010.511246 · Cited by 1,686
Cited by
What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies
Drews, S., & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2016) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2015.1058240 · Cited by 965
Perceived fairness and public acceptability of carbon pricing: a review of the literature
Maestre-Andrés, S., Drews, S., & van den Bergh, J. (2019) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2019.1639490 · Cited by 489
Overcoming public resistance to carbon taxes
Carattini, S., Carvalho, M., & Fankhauser, S. (2018) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.531 · Cited by 455
Yellow Vests, Pessimistic Beliefs, and Carbon Tax Aversion
Douenne, T., & Fabre, A. (2022) · American Economic Journal: Economic Policy · doi:10.1257/pol.20200092 · Cited by 308
Tracking global carbon revenues: A survey of carbon taxes versus cap-and-trade in the real world
Carl, J., & Fedor, D. (2016) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.05.023 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Kallbekken, S., & Sælen, H.
- Venue
- Energy Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-05
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2966-2973
- ISSN
- 0301-4215 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2091662913
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 25.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Public acceptance for environmental taxes: Self-interest, environmental and distributional concerns. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.006
- The paper
- Kallbekken, S., & Sælen, H. (2011). Public acceptance for environmental taxes: Self-interest, environmental and distributional concerns. Energy Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
