The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New frontiers and conceptual frameworks for energy justice
Open accessAbstract
This article explores how concepts from justice and ethics can inform energy decision-making and highlight the moral and equity dimensions of energy production and use. It defines “energy justice” as a global energy system that fairly distributes both the benefits and burdens of energy services, and one that contributes to more representative and inclusive energy decision-making. The primary contribution of the article is its focus on six new frontiers of future energy justice research. First is making the case for the involvement of non-Western justice theorists. Second is expanding beyond humans to look at the Rights of Nature or non-anthropocentric notions of justice. Third is focusing on cross-scalar issues of justice such as embodied emissions. Fourth is identifying business models and the co-benefits of justice. Fifth is better understanding the tradeoffs within energy justice principles. Sixth is exposing unjust discourses. In doing so, the article presents an agenda constituted by 30 research questions as well as an amended conceptual framework consisting of ten principles. The article argues in favor of “justice-aware” energy planning and policymaking, and it hopes that its (reconsidered) energy justice conceptual framework offers a critical tool to inform decision-making.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color
Crenshaw, K. (1991) · Stanford Law Review · doi:10.2307/1229039 · Cited by 32,792
Theorising environmental justice: The expanding sphere of a discourse
Schlosberg, D. (2013) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644016.2013.755387 · Cited by 1,214 · cited 1×
“Environmental justice in particular recognizes the “sacredness” of the nonhuman environment and the interdependence of all species (Schlosberg, 2013, pp. 43–44).”
BackgroundContestation, contingency, and justice in the nordic low-carbon energy transition
Sovacool, B. K. (2017) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.045 · Cited by 198
Self-citation
Cited by
The justice and equity implications of the clean energy transition
Carley, S., & Konisky, D. M. (2020) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-020-0641-6 · Cited by 1,445
Sovacool, B. K. (2021) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.101916 · Cited by 614
Self-citationWilliams, S., & Doyon, A. (2019) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2018.12.001 · Cited by 336
Temper, L., Avila, S., Bene, D. D., Gobby, J., Kosoy, N., Billon, P. L., Martinez-Alier, J., Perkins, P., Roy, B., Scheidel, A., et al. (2020) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abc197 · Cited by 320
(2021) · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abd78c · Cited by 251
Metadata
- Authors
- Sovacool, B. K., Burke, M., Baker, L., Kotikalapudi, C. K., & Wlokas, H.
- Venue
- Energy Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-06
- Volume
- 105
- Pages
- 677-691
- ISSN
- 0301-4215 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2597171500
- Cited by
- 823
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 216.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New frontiers and conceptual frameworks for energy justice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.005
- The paper
- Sovacool, B. K., Burke, M., Baker, L., Kotikalapudi, C. K., & Wlokas, H. (2017). New frontiers and conceptual frameworks for energy justice. Energy Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.