Cited by 201Sustainability and Climate Change GovernanceRenewable Energy and SustainabilityGlobal Energy Security and Policy

Contestation, contingency, and justice in the nordic low-carbon energy transition

Open access
Sovacool, Benjamin K.·2017·Energy Policy

Abstract

The five Nordic countries have aggressive climate and energy policies in place and have already emerged to be leaders in renewable energy and energy efficiency. Denmark is renowned for its pioneering use of wind energy, Finland and Sweden bioenergy, Norway hydroelectricity and Iceland geothermal energy. All countries aim to be virtually “fossil free” by 2050. This study explores the Nordic energy transition through the lens of three interconnected research questions: How are they doing it? What challenges exist? And what broader lessons result for energy policy? The study firstly investigates the pathways necessary for these five countries to achieve their low-carbon goals. It argues that a concerted effort must be made to (1) promote decentralized and renewable forms of electricity supply; (2) shift to more sustainable forms of transport; (3) further improve the energy efficiency of residential and commercial buildings; and (4) adopt carbon capture and storage technologies for industry. However, the section that follows emphasizes some of the empirical barriers the Nordic transition must confront, namely political contestation, technological contingency, and social justice and recognition concerns. The study concludes with implications for what such historical progress, and future transition pathways, mean for both energy researchers and energy planners.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.045

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nordic nations have traditionally been positioned at the top of various indicators in favor of EV diffusion, such as being able to afford EVs and pushing aggressive decarbonization agendas within the energy and transport sectors.

    “The research is placed in a Nordic context as these nations have traditionally been positioned at the top various indicators in favor of EV diffusion (for example, that they can afford EVs, often considered an expensive technology), as well as being recognized for pushing aggressive decarbonization agendas within the energy and transport sectors”

    From Understanding the socio-technical nexus of Nordic electric vehicle (EV) barriers: A qualitative discussion of range, price, charging and knowledge (2020) · cites this paper as Sovacool, 2017

    The Introduction describes the Nordic countries as wealthy and their energy and climate policies as highly ambitious; §3.3, Transport, describes substantial transport-electrification goals (page numbers not supplied). But the paper does not rank the countries on indicators favoring EV diffusion or establish that consumers can afford EVs. Section 4.2 instead notes relatively slow EV diffusion across the region. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sovacool, B. K.
Affiliations
University of Sussex (GB)
Corresponding author
Sovacool, Benjamin K.
Venue
Energy Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
102
Pages
569-582
ISSN
0301-4215 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2574034258
Cited by
198
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 5
FWCI
10.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2017-05-01)
Open access
Locations
  • Energy Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Research Councils United Kingdom (RCUK) Energy Program (EP/K011790/1)
  • Danish Council for Independent Research (DFF) Sapere Aude (4182-00033B)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Renewable Energy and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › General Energy › Global Energy Security and Policy
Keywords
low-carbon transition, renewable energy, wind energy, bioenergy, hydropower, geothermal energy, sustainable transport, building energy efficiency, carbon capture and storage, political contestation, social justice, recognition, energy transition pathways

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review