Cited by 28Building energy efficiency and sustainabilityBuilding Energy and Comfort OptimizationIntegrated Energy Systems Optimization

Catalyzing political momentum for the effective implementation of decarbonization for urban buildings

Open access
Tozer, Laura, University, Durham·2020·Energy Policy

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111042

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Making strong links to a larger urban agenda offers a way to forge buy-in from a wide range of stakeholders and build coalitions with interest groups already taking a stand around waste, equity and preservation to advance climate justice.

    “Making strong links to a larger urban agenda offers a way to forge buy-in from a wide range of stakeholders and build coalitions with interest groups already taking a stand around waste, equity and preservation to advance climate justice (Klinsky and Mavrogianni 2020;Tozer 2020).”

    From Making embodied carbon mainstream: a framework for cities to leverage waste, equity, and preservation policy to reduce embodied emissions in buildings (2023) · cites this paper as Tozer 2020

    Section 4.2, “Coalition building” (page not provided), reports that connecting climate action to other priorities helped municipal departments take ownership of decarbonization, and that coalitions built support for building standards. Section 5, “Discussion” (page not provided), raises equity concerns but does not describe coalitions with groups active on waste, equity, or preservation to advance climate justice. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tozer, L., & University, D.
Corresponding author
Tozer, Laura
Venue
Energy Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
136
Pages
111042
ISSN
0301-4215 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2987780270
Cited by
28
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Energy Policy (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building energy efficiency and sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
Keywords
urban decarbonization, low-carbon construction, political momentum, policy implementation, urban buildings, climate policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review